Jump to content

Global Warming Update!


Reagan

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, Tigers2010 said:

Okay how about this:

Global Warming is a natural process that has occurred over the course of Earth's history. 

The advancement of Man has sped up the process to some degree, but that, in itself, is also a natural part of life.

Stop bringing logic into this discussion! ;) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Tigers2010 said:

Okay how about this:

Global Warming is a natural process that has occurred over the course of Earth's history. 

The advancement of Man has sped up the process to some degree, but that, in itself, is also a natural part of life.

Should we spend trillions of dollars trying to reverse or even change a natural part of life? If so, would these trillions spent make one iota of a difference? Should we study the cause and effect of such efforts before throwing money at a theorized solution to a problem that is not even defined? Oh wait, I can't ask these questions. The science is settled and I should just hand over my wallet and go live with the Amish.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Englebert said:

Should we spend trillions of dollars trying to reverse or even change a natural part of life? If so, would these trillions spent make one iota of a difference? Should we study the cause and effect of such efforts before throwing money at a theorized solution to a problem that is not even defined? Oh wait, I can't ask these questions. The science is settled and I should just hand over my wallet and go live with the Amish.

There it is...that's all us deniers have be saying for years.

That, my MMGW supporters, would be science.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Englebert said:

Should we spend trillions of dollars trying to reverse or even change a natural part of life? If so, would these trillions spent make one iota of a difference? Should we study the cause and effect of such efforts before throwing money at a theorized solution to a problem that is not even defined? Oh wait, I can't ask these questions. The science is settled and I should just hand over my wallet and go live with the Amish.

For me, no. I would let some nerdy guy in a white short sleeved button up sit in a room and figure it out. I would give him a chinese food take out voucher per day and let him dig in. Maybe once a year fly him to the North Pole and check on things. But no, I would not be for dropping a Trilly on this thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Tigers2010 said:

For me, no. I would let some nerdy guy in a white short sleeved button up sit in a room and figure it out. I would give him a chinese food take out voucher per day and let him dig in. Maybe once a year fly him to the North Pole and check on things. But no, I would not be for dropping a Trilly on this thing.

I think that is what most of us "deniers" are saying. Let's figure this thing out before committing a whole lot of money that might or might not be useful. The problem is when we say things like this, we get labeled with all kinds of cute little words that are in no way flattering. In fact, some are trying to make us into criminals just for asking obvious questions. I have read many stories of people losing their job for having the audacity to simply question the MMGW theory. Skepticism is the driving force of science, but the MMGW nazis want to stifle any modicum of perceived dissent, and simple little questions definitely qualify in their minds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Englebert said:

I think that is what most of us "deniers" are saying. Let's figure this thing out before committing a whole lot of money that might or might not be useful. The problem is when we say things like this, we get labeled with all kinds of cute little words that are in no way flattering. In fact, some are trying to make us into criminals just for asking obvious questions. I have read many stories of people losing their job for having the audacity to simply question the MMGW theory. Skepticism is the driving force of science, but the MMGW nazis want to stifle any modicum of perceived dissent, and simple little questions definitely qualify in their minds.

Part of it is our communication with each other. We gotta stop letting it get contentious and even personal. We gotta find common ground and go from there. Not just on this topic, but on almost all of the ones on this board. BigGirl and that group do the same, but we gotta do better at communicating as well, or nothing gets done. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, Tigers2010 said:

I have tried, oh have I tried. You two are like my two boys (Aggie vs Longhorn) at freaking Thanksgiving. (when they still played).

 

55 minutes ago, Englebert said:

Who is the Aggie? Don't you dare put that moniker on me. :)

Agreed.  I may disagree with Eng on some issues, such as this one, but he doesn’t deserve that!

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Smh.  Poor Reagan/Smitty.  Thanks again for unintentionally posting data that means the exact opposite of what you think it does.  

Don’t feel bad though.  Ms. Prestigiacomo apparently has a job writing and she has no clue either.  This is the stuff of FB and social media that gives me a good laugh every time the temperature drops.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TxHoops said:

Here you go pal.  Some light reading so you won’t fall for the dumbarsery they publish on daily wire.  

This is the hidden content, please

This is the hidden content, please

 

The Man-Made Global Warming nazis have managed to convince people you can have your cake and eat it too.

It's too hot outside - Man-Made Global Warming

It's too cold outside - Man-Made Global Warming

It's a very mild winter - Man-Made Global Warming

It's a very harsh winter - Man-Made Global Warming

The hurricane season was almost as bad as the 1930s - Man-Made Global Warming

Hillary lost the election - Man-Made Global Warming

Does that about sum it up?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TxHoops said:

Smh.  Poor Reagan/Smitty.  Thanks again for unintentionally posting data that means the exact opposite of what you think it does.  

Don’t feel bad though.  Ms. Prestigiacomo apparently has a job writing and she has no clue either.  This is the stuff of FB and social media that gives me a good laugh every time the temperature drops.  

Do you get the same gut-wrenching chuckles every time you read some Man-Made Global Warming nazi writing about Polar bears starving due to MMGW? What about the nutcases that attribute every weather pattern to MMGW? What about every photo of Earth's ever changing scenery attributed to MMGW? There are many more instances of these, which should keep you in stitches for the rest of your life.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I recently saw a documentary (on NGO I think) about Antarctica.  On one side of the continent they showed massive chunks of ice falling into the ocean.  But they also said on another side, the ice was building up at about the same rate.  If we could get the scientists off the OWGovt. Teat attempting to prove a preconceived OWG conviction, maybe they could try to ascertain if perhaps the earth has wobbled off its axis, which, I'm guessing, would affect the weather.  It would also explain why my G'son is not making 100% of his threes :) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, TxHoops said:

My bad Eng.  I’m in a bad mood this morning lol

I'm in a pretty good mood after last night's game. It would have been a lot sweeter if the opponent would have been one of the other former Big12 teams (and I'm not referring to Nebraska or Colorado).  Too bad the SEC is too scared to even dare allow that matchup. If you don't feel like "debating" right now, this post should get PhatMack on the warpath. Oh wait, this is the political forum...he and I are on the same side. I'm not venturing to the College section. Y'all are brutal over there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Englebert said:

I'm in a pretty good mood after last night's game. It would have been a lot sweeter if the opponent would have been one of the other former Big12 teams (and I'm not referring to Nebraska or Colorado).  Too bad the SEC is too scared to even dare allow that matchup. If you don't feel like "debating" right now, this post should get PhatMack on the warpath. Oh wait, this is the political forum...he and I are on the same side. I'm not venturing to the College section. Y'all are brutal over there.

I was elated as well pal.   I like you on both boards but for some reason a smidge more over there.  And I’m much more passionate about college athletics than politics.  Yes, I’m part of the problem :D 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,933
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    jacobmartin
    Newest Member
    jacobmartin
    Joined



  • Posts

    • Yeah, I got that but talk about a stretch. It should seem obvious that Trump’s prosecution is purely political. If someone is going to do a whataboutism, at least make it similar.  This is so ludicrous that it’s like comparing a ham sandwich to a wallet.   
    • You consistently try to say Trump ran our debt up and that the stock market and job market cratered during his administration (along with other MSNBC talking points). That is a flat out LIE, and you know it. Not only are you telling a mistruth, you knowingly are telling a mistruth...which is a blatant LIE...which makes you a "(I don't remember what word you used to describe Trump, something like a purse for dirt)" does it not? You know for a fact that the economy, stock market, and job market was thriving under Trump. You know that the Democrats controlled the house, and proposed a budget that would hurt the economy, in which he shut down the government. Even after this fiasco brought on by Democrats, our economy flourished under his administration. Then Covid19 hit, and the blue states shut down the country. YOU KNOW THIS, but continue to blame Trump. You lie...blatantly. Again, what do we call these people that partake in disseminating misleading information. You coined it...that purse thing. Does the shoe fit? I bet it does. It is amazing that you try to put "MAGA people" into this little box for the soul purpose of allowing all negative attributes of anyone that will vote for Trump instead of Biden to be attributed. That is a sickening modus operandi of stupid people. It is hard for me to believe that you would adopt that childish stereotyping. But since you are willing, I'm willing to push back. I'm a Trump supporter. I will gladly vote for him over Biden. So get busy putting me in your silly little box of stereotypes so I can embarrass you some more. You've been shot down by practically everyone on this board when you say stuff like Trump is their Messiah, or that supporters overlook his flaws. Everyone on this board has stated that they don't agree with Trump on much of his behavior, but you ignore these statements and continue with your lies. Oh yeah, since I'm a Trump supporter, those comments were also directed directly at me. So let's go. Prove I'm a simpleton that will ignore all of Trump's flaws and vow to disown the bad ol' orangeman. Let's continue that diatribe you peddle. I now am interested in responding. I also have boxes I can place people in. Whose box is accurate? Better yet, whose box is more embarrassing? I'm fairly certain your box is more entertaining for the board to make fun of. TDS should be included in the DSM-6, or revise the DSM-5 to include it since this phenomenon is so pervasive now. You are a walking, talking picture of Trump Derangement Syndrome. Do you like that box? Can you refute the rationale for placing you in that box. Everyone can refute your rationale for placing them into your irrational box, while you languish in your TDS box.
    • Clinton got impeached because of it. David Pecker said it was true about Stormy today. Under oath.
    • Election interference. Cheating.
    • It’s not about worrying about Trump’s morality. It’s about him being held to a totally hypocritical standard that is applied to anybody else that’s not him. Double it if it happens to be a Democrat. What he did to Ted Cruz in 2016, for example. Accused him of extramarital affairs. Really? And the gang cheered the Master on. Sick is what it is.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...