Jump to content

Carthage Henderson scuffle


ST413

Recommended Posts

Was reading a thread on this game and there was a pretty big scuffle apparently on the Henderson sideline.  My question here is just a rule question, apparently A large number of the Henderson players crossed the 25 yard line leaving the team “box”and 10-15 Carthage players crossed the field into the fight area.  I am not going to make any speculations as to what happened, but should these players from both teams that left their team “box” have been ejected?  All that was done was double unsportsmanlikes were called. No ejections. Really only wanting the rule question answered, I am not going to get into a discussion on the fight didn’t see it not going to speculate but  this could have had a major impact on the rest of the playoffs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A coach or player that participates in a fight is subject to a game disqualification according to NCAA (and thus UIL rules).  However, the rule leaves vague as to what constitutes "participating in a a fight."  In reviewing the rules, I did not see a specific rule mandating ejection if a player leaves the team "box."

This is probably to give the officials leeway in restoring order.  And from what I gathered, order was restored and no further incidents of that magnitude occurred.  Of course, the UIL has the discretion to review the matter given that it was a playoff game, but that nothing really came of it, I don't see them doing so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ST413 said:

Was reading a thread on this game and there was a pretty big scuffle apparently on the Henderson sideline.  My question here is just a rule question, apparently A large number of the Henderson players crossed the 25 yard line leaving the team “box”and 10-15 Carthage players crossed the field into the fight area.  I am not going to make any speculations as to what happened, but should these players from both teams that left their team “box” have been ejected?  All that was done was double unsportsmanlikes were called. No ejections. Really only wanting the rule question answered, I am not going to get into a discussion on the fight didn’t see it not going to speculate but  this could have had a major impact on the rest of the playoffs.

It was a pretty good brawl

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, ST413 said:

Haven’t found any but it sounded big.

56 minutes ago, ST413 said:

I think they had one called back that might have been it.  Either way I didn’t see the large number of Henderson players that I read about,  it didn’t really look as bad as what I read.

I agree I thought the LCM and Dayton fight actually looked worse

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was watching the game on texanlive.com when it happened (wife is a Henderson graduate).  Henderson intercepted the pass and took it down the Henderson sideline.  DB for Henderson was tackled by Carthage all-world RB.  It was hard to make out what exactly happened on the sideline and the cameras cut away pretty quickly.  I have several contacts at the game (on the Henderson side mind you so it might be a slanted take on what happened), but those contacts were saying that Carthage running back took exception to Henderson celebrating, some pushing and shoving on the sideline, and then Carthage RB threw punches.  The swings brought both benches to the party but all that happened was unsportsmanlike on both teams (cheap way out by the officials but if they didn't see the swings, then they didn't see the swings).  If Carthage RB is ejected, its a completely different ball game, but I think Carthage still would have had too much for Henderson to keep up.  NOTE:  it was 7-0 Carthage when this happened and Henderson never scored.

Also, if punches were thrown and no ejections, UIL might be taking a look at the video in a lil more detail.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,932
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    TRUTHTELLER409
    Newest Member
    TRUTHTELLER409
    Joined


  • Posts

    • Yeah, I got that but talk about a stretch. It should seem obvious that Trump’s prosecution is purely political. If someone is going to do a whataboutism, at least make it similar.  This is so ludicrous that it’s like comparing a ham sandwich to a wallet.   
    • You consistently try to say Trump ran our debt up and that the stock market and job market cratered during his administration (along with other MSNBC talking points). That is a flat out LIE, and you know it. Not only are you telling a mistruth, you knowingly are telling a mistruth...which is a blatant LIE...which makes you a "(I don't remember what word you used to describe Trump, something like a purse for dirt)" does it not? You know for a fact that the economy, stock market, and job market was thriving under Trump. You know that the Democrats controlled the house, and proposed a budget that would hurt the economy, in which he shut down the government. Even after this fiasco brought on by Democrats, our economy flourished under his administration. Then Covid19 hit, and the blue states shut down the country. YOU KNOW THIS, but continue to blame Trump. You lie...blatantly. Again, what do we call these people that partake in disseminating misleading information. You coined it...that purse thing. Does the shoe fit? I bet it does. It is amazing that you try to put "MAGA people" into this little box for the soul purpose of allowing all negative attributes of anyone that will vote for Trump instead of Biden to be attributed. That is a sickening modus operandi of stupid people. It is hard for me to believe that you would adopt that childish stereotyping. But since you are willing, I'm willing to push back. I'm a Trump supporter. I will gladly vote for him over Biden. So get busy putting me in your silly little box of stereotypes so I can embarrass you some more. You've been shot down by practically everyone on this board when you say stuff like Trump is their Messiah, or that supporters overlook his flaws. Everyone on this board has stated that they don't agree with Trump on much of his behavior, but you ignore these statements and continue with your lies. Oh yeah, since I'm a Trump supporter, those comments were also directed directly at me. So let's go. Prove I'm a simpleton that will ignore all of Trump's flaws and vow to disown the bad ol' orangeman. Let's continue that diatribe you peddle. I now am interested in responding. I also have boxes I can place people in. Whose box is accurate? Better yet, whose box is more embarrassing? I'm fairly certain your box is more entertaining for the board to make fun of. TDS should be included in the DSM-6, or revise the DSM-5 to include it since this phenomenon is so pervasive now. You are a walking, talking picture of Trump Derangement Syndrome. Do you like that box? Can you refute the rationale for placing you in that box. Everyone can refute your rationale for placing them into your irrational box, while you languish in your TDS box.
    • Clinton got impeached because of it. David Pecker said it was true about Stormy today. Under oath.
    • Election interference. Cheating.
    • It’s not about worrying about Trump’s morality. It’s about him being held to a totally hypocritical standard that is applied to anybody else that’s not him. Double it if it happens to be a Democrat. What he did to Ted Cruz in 2016, for example. Accused him of extramarital affairs. Really? And the gang cheered the Master on. Sick is what it is.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...