Jump to content

PN-G vs College Station


prepballfan

Recommended Posts

25 minutes ago, ROSCHONSBIGBRO said:

This is their game vs waco. We will have definite opportunities to move the ball on O. They imo are not all that impressive on D. Can't have mistakes like penalies and drops to help them out.

On O what worries me is their pace if they get in a groove. Better be ready to make the tackle and line back up immediately. They take advantage of confusion.

 

 

This is what I was saying we need to do also. If we're just going to run RJ, line back up quick and let him do his thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Leander was putting up more PPG than CS.  Also, Leander was giving up less than 180 Yds per game on Defense.  I honestly expected PNG vs Leander BC of that defense.  Here we go again. Another shootout is what I predict.  Special teams will be the difference once again.  

Catch the daygone ball!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

special teams kills us every year, last week they botched the kickoff, all you have to do is catch the kickoff its that simple. I hate when they just call for a fair catch when a lot of the times they have room to run, Stansbury has speed to make something happen in open field. Get some balls and run, lets try to make something happen, quit being so conservative. Just my opinion lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, biaplayer said:

special teams kills us every year, last week they botched the kickoff, all you have to do is catch the kickoff its that simple. I hate when they just call for a fair catch when a lot of the times they have room to run, Stansbury has speed to make something happen in open field. Get some balls and run, lets try to make something happen, quit being so conservative. Just my opinion lol

Not sure how much of that was the return teams fault. All of those kicks were well placed in my opinion. There was a previous kickoff in that game where #13 and #8 got tangled up with the ball. Small fault to the return team but just better kicking. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

College Station (10-2) vs. Port Neches-Groves (10-1), 1 p.m. Saturday at Humble’s Turner Stadium
There will be lots of purple at Turner Stadium for this third-round rematch from a 2016 playoff game won by College Station. The Cougars needed a second-half rally last week to knock off a tough Georgetown squad, 34-31. QB Marquez Perez was the difference tallying 425 yards of offense and four total touchdowns. The Cougars’ defense has all eyes on PNG junior QB Roschon Johsnon. The Texas-commit has put up staggering numbers all year long to lead the Indians. Last week however, Texas City had a good game plan to slow the PNG attack as although Johnson ran for 193 yards and a touchdown, he only threw for 67 yards in a 24-17 win. PNG has the best player on the field in Johnson, but College Station has multiple playmakers and good speed on the defensive side of the ball. Unless Johnson just goes nuts like he did in bi-district, I expect College Station to pull away in a high scoring affair.
Stepp’s Pick: College Station by 15
Max’s Pick: College Station
Ishmael’s Pick: College Station
Brady’s Pick: Port Neches-Groves

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, 22-5A talk said:

College Station (10-2) vs. Port Neches-Groves (10-1), 1 p.m. Saturday at Humble’s Turner Stadium
There will be lots of purple at Turner Stadium for this third-round rematch from a 2016 playoff game won by College Station. The Cougars needed a second-half rally last week to knock off a tough Georgetown squad, 34-31. QB Marquez Perez was the difference tallying 425 yards of offense and four total touchdowns. The Cougars’ defense has all eyes on PNG junior QB Roschon Johsnon. The Texas-commit has put up staggering numbers all year long to lead the Indians. Last week however, Texas City had a good game plan to slow the PNG attack as although Johnson ran for 193 yards and a touchdown, he only threw for 67 yards in a 24-17 win. PNG has the best player on the field in Johnson, but College Station has multiple playmakers and good speed on the defensive side of the ball. Unless Johnson just goes nuts like he did in bi-district, I expect College Station to pull away in a high scoring affair.
Stepp’s Pick: College Station by 15
Max’s Pick: College Station
Ishmael’s Pick: College Station
Brady’s Pick: Port Neches-Groves

Pretty good assessment... I agree 100%...................

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, 22-5A talk said:

College Station (10-2) vs. Port Neches-Groves (10-1), 1 p.m. Saturday at Humble’s Turner Stadium
There will be lots of purple at Turner Stadium for this third-round rematch from a 2016 playoff game won by College Station. The Cougars needed a second-half rally last week to knock off a tough Georgetown squad, 34-31. QB Marquez Perez was the difference tallying 425 yards of offense and four total touchdowns. The Cougars’ defense has all eyes on PNG junior QB Roschon Johsnon. The Texas-commit has put up staggering numbers all year long to lead the Indians. Last week however, Texas City had a good game plan to slow the PNG attack as although Johnson ran for 193 yards and a touchdown, he only threw for 67 yards in a 24-17 win. PNG has the best player on the field in Johnson, but College Station has multiple playmakers and good speed on the defensive side of the ball. Unless Johnson just goes nuts like he did in bi-district, I expect College Station to pull away in a high scoring affair.
Stepp’s Pick: College Station by 15
Max’s Pick: College Station
Ishmael’s Pick: College Station
Brady’s Pick: Port Neches-Groves

Hard to disagree.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, chief1987 said:

Perez doesn't play WR and unless there's some tackling going on don't expect much shining. Now I will be hoping for some tackling and a PNG victory. 

Positive thinking!! I know Perez plays QB, but if he breaks one in the open Hughes can catch him. If Alec And Austin tackle we won't have to worry about chasing him down. But I am also a realist, he will get through the d-line on some.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,935
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    jacobmartin
    Newest Member
    jacobmartin
    Joined



  • Posts

    • This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  
    • Diboll - 1  Central Heights- 0
    • Just to expound a little further, so you are not confused...I, along with so many others, are laughing at your desperation. You are working overtime, nay, double even triple time, trying to convince normal people Trump was bad for the country. His policies provided for peace all over the world, low gas prices, low food prices, energy independence, closed border, low inflation, record low unemployment, and on and on and on. You try to counter this narrative by saying unemployment skyrocketed on his watch. You said this knowing full well the unemployment rate went up due to Covid. Your narrative is just so laughable, to the point of side-splitting hilarity. Who would even attempt this asinine narrative? Now, even if you get past the utter stupidity of that MSNBC talking point, you provide another side-splitting hilarious tidbit of evidence to back your claim of Trump being bad for the country. You actually tried to tie the stock market going down to Trump...after Covid. You, I, and everybody else knows the stock market was flourishing under Trump...until Covid hit. This argument is just as bad as the other one. Again, who would even attempt this narrative? The only thing you could remotely muster that had any sliver of truthfulness, is that spending increased. Sure, Trump rebuilt the military and gave them a deserved raise. But he also had to shut down the government due to Democrats demanding an even more, and very detrimental, increase in spending. And in a true extremely exaggerated fashion, you proclaim that spending "skyrocketed". Again, who would even attempt this narrative? I think I can smell the desperation. Do you have any other whoppers to contribute?
    • He was injured but has returned and he decided not to play baseball this year.
    • There's some truth to that.......some.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...