Jump to content

Hardin-Jefferson 69 Nederland 61/FINAL


WOSgrad

Recommended Posts

Nash is covered.   No one wants to take a 60 year old juvenile case.  Although I will go on record saying I would take this case pro bono.  Just being with Nash in juvie court would be worth more in entertainment value than $$.  And yes, I said a 60 year old case.   Don’t let that full head of auburn hair fool you.  He ain’t 45.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, BMTSoulja1 said:

I assume no one knows the answer to my initial question...

Sorry Soulja, I don't.  Thread has turned into a discussion on whether stevenash gets charged for being a pervert or rigging HS basketball games (for financial gains?). :) 

Either way, I wouldn't miss the trial for the world.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, AggiesAreWe said:

And points are important in your expert analysis?

He scored 51 of the 61. How's that for your analysis?

Just asked a simple question.  All the other sentimental garbage, you could've kept.  

Next time, if you don't know, just don't answer or just say you don't know.  

Ohh, and ummm, Happy Thanksgiving.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I remember a former Jag Soulja was high on.  Almost always led them in scoring.  Saw him play many times and it was like fingernails on a chalk board for me.  Would go stretches of the game without involving his teammates at all.  If he got in trouble, they might get a pass and then he was calling for it back.  That was one of the most talented teams I’ve seen in this area.   And I was at the second round game where they were eliminated.  More of the same...

Give me the efficiency stat line over points any day of the week.  Factors in all aspects of the game, positive and negative. Points are only one component.  If you want to know who the real players are, there’s your formula. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, TxHoops said:

I remember a former Jag Soulja was high on.  Almost always led them in scoring.  Saw him play many times and it was like fingernails on a chalk board for me.  Would go stretches of the game without involving his teammates at all.  If he got in trouble, they might get a pass and then he was calling for it back.  That was one of the most talented teams I’ve seen in this area.   And I was at the second round game where they were eliminated.  More of the same...

Give me the efficiency stat line over points any day of the week.  Factors in all aspects of the game, positive and negative. Points are only one component.  If you want to know who the real players are, there’s your formula. 

Which player was that?  Refresh my memory.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, AggiesAreWe said:

Yes, more points by the TEAM would have helped Nederland. Not necessarily more from the player.

There was an 8 point differential.  You have a player that's highly ranked and the rest are mediocre players.  I would think it would be not asking for much for this star player to score 8 more points. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, AggiesAreWe said:

Christian

Yes, I was high on this player. It you never asked me me reason why.  Reason why was prior to him getting to Central, we'd take it on the chin from Oxen every year.  He came I'm and almost instantly, Central basketball changed.  Wasn't backing down from Oxen and we went on a mini streak on beating Ozen.  He was the catalysis.  Sure, he was pretty raw as a freshman, but ends up by his senior year as probably the best in SETX.  Actually, in that second round loss, he did pretty good!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, BMTSoulja1 said:

Yes, I was high on this player. It you never asked me me reason why.  Reason why was prior to him getting to Central, we'd take it on the chin from Oxen every year.  He came I'm and almost instantly, Central basketball changed.  Wasn't backing down from Oxen and we went on a mini streak on beating Ozen.  He was the catalysis.  Sure, he was pretty raw as a freshman, but ends up by his senior year as probably the best in SETX.  Actually, in that second round loss, he did pretty good!

Not him or that team.  The kid I’m talking about was/is very talented and works as hard as anyone.   But at least in HS, more times than not it looked like “me” over “team.”   And he was dreadful in the second round loss I’m talking about.  Central’s loss vs Silsbee’s win in the backend of that double header were a stark contrast.  The first was way too much 1 on 5. The second was we’ll take our ten and play whoever you put in front of us. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Member Statistics

    45,933
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    jacobmartin
    Newest Member
    jacobmartin
    Joined



  • Posts

    • Yeah, I got that but talk about a stretch. It should seem obvious that Trump’s prosecution is purely political. If someone is going to do a whataboutism, at least make it similar.  This is so ludicrous that it’s like comparing a ham sandwich to a wallet.   
    • You consistently try to say Trump ran our debt up and that the stock market and job market cratered during his administration (along with other MSNBC talking points). That is a flat out LIE, and you know it. Not only are you telling a mistruth, you knowingly are telling a mistruth...which is a blatant LIE...which makes you a "(I don't remember what word you used to describe Trump, something like a purse for dirt)" does it not? You know for a fact that the economy, stock market, and job market was thriving under Trump. You know that the Democrats controlled the house, and proposed a budget that would hurt the economy, in which he shut down the government. Even after this fiasco brought on by Democrats, our economy flourished under his administration. Then Covid19 hit, and the blue states shut down the country. YOU KNOW THIS, but continue to blame Trump. You lie...blatantly. Again, what do we call these people that partake in disseminating misleading information. You coined it...that purse thing. Does the shoe fit? I bet it does. It is amazing that you try to put "MAGA people" into this little box for the soul purpose of allowing all negative attributes of anyone that will vote for Trump instead of Biden to be attributed. That is a sickening modus operandi of stupid people. It is hard for me to believe that you would adopt that childish stereotyping. But since you are willing, I'm willing to push back. I'm a Trump supporter. I will gladly vote for him over Biden. So get busy putting me in your silly little box of stereotypes so I can embarrass you some more. You've been shot down by practically everyone on this board when you say stuff like Trump is their Messiah, or that supporters overlook his flaws. Everyone on this board has stated that they don't agree with Trump on much of his behavior, but you ignore these statements and continue with your lies. Oh yeah, since I'm a Trump supporter, those comments were also directed directly at me. So let's go. Prove I'm a simpleton that will ignore all of Trump's flaws and vow to disown the bad ol' orangeman. Let's continue that diatribe you peddle. I now am interested in responding. I also have boxes I can place people in. Whose box is accurate? Better yet, whose box is more embarrassing? I'm fairly certain your box is more entertaining for the board to make fun of. TDS should be included in the DSM-6, or revise the DSM-5 to include it since this phenomenon is so pervasive now. You are a walking, talking picture of Trump Derangement Syndrome. Do you like that box? Can you refute the rationale for placing you in that box. Everyone can refute your rationale for placing them into your irrational box, while you languish in your TDS box.
    • Clinton got impeached because of it. David Pecker said it was true about Stormy today. Under oath.
    • Election interference. Cheating.
    • It’s not about worrying about Trump’s morality. It’s about him being held to a totally hypocritical standard that is applied to anybody else that’s not him. Double it if it happens to be a Democrat. What he did to Ted Cruz in 2016, for example. Accused him of extramarital affairs. Really? And the gang cheered the Master on. Sick is what it is.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...