Jump to content

Beaumont Ozen 50 Beaumont West Brook 47/FINAL


WOSgrad

Recommended Posts

15 hours ago, Yeoj said:

Don't forget the refs. Ozen will go undefeated if those 3 call all their games.

You can be serious now the foul count was WB 2- Ozen 16 in the 1st half ,2nd half Ozen 5 &  WB 7. You can’t expect refs to be perfect they are gonna make questionable calls you have to make adjustments and play thru it . Don’t  make excuses it looks bad . WB had a 10 point lead and let it go that’s the real reason .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Yeoj said:

Don't forget the refs. Ozen will go undefeated if those 3 call all their games.

Come on Man lol...Brook was shooting double bonus at the beginning of the 2nd quarter...It's funny the losing team complains about the refs..Sorry the refs didnt bail The Brook out in the end, yall were up by 10 and got out played by a very young Ozen team..WB will get another shot at Ozen Dec.15 at The Brook...Until then we'll keep working to get better... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Was at the game, and coach/have coached a few kids from both schools, so my opinion is unbiased. If West Brook can get Parque and Simon going, they should win on their home floor by 15-20. Ozen definitely deserved to win that game though, no doubt. Once they had a few players buy in, it was game over and West Brook folded tent. Even when they were up by a few, their bench looked like they knew they were fixing to lose. Someone other than Boutte has to step up and lead them in that situation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, BlkMamba24 said:

You can be serious now the foul count was WB 2- Ozen 16 in the 1st half ,2nd half Ozen 5 &  WB 7. You can’t expect refs to be perfect they are gonna make questionable calls you have to make adjustments and play thru it . Don’t  make excuses it looks bad . WB had a 10 point lead and let it go that’s the real reason .

*ouch*

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, BlkMamba24 said:

You can be serious now the foul count was WB 2- Ozen 16 in the 1st half ,2nd half Ozen 5 &  WB 7. You can’t expect refs to be perfect they are gonna make questionable calls you have to make adjustments and play thru it . Don’t  make excuses it looks bad . WB had a 10 point lead and let it go that’s the real reason .

The foul count was 16 to 2 in the first half?  You gotta be kidding me!  I have never heard of a foul count to be that lopsided in a game.  Bottom line is Ozen won the game.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, 409ANALYST said:

The foul count was 16 to 2 in the first half?  You gotta be kidding me!  I have never heard of a foul count to be that lopsided in a game.  Bottom line is Ozen won the game.  

Ozen did have more fouls called on them in the first half but it was not 16-2.  Parquet and CArpenter each had two fouls in the first half.  I'm sure others were called too. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, BlkMamba24 said:

You can be serious now the foul count was WB 2- Ozen 16 in the 1st half ,2nd half Ozen 5 &  WB 7. You can’t expect refs to be perfect they are gonna make questionable calls you have to make adjustments and play thru it . Don’t  make excuses it looks bad . WB had a 10 point lead and let it go that’s the real reason .

What looks bad is when at least two of the refs have a serious conflict of interest. And where did you get that foul count from? lol...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You do know after the 10th foul the clock doesn’t keep putting fouls up smdh and i stand corrected it was 13. Nevertheless before you open your mouths make sure you watch the enire game .West Brook isn’t even close to 15-20 points better than Ozen or anyone else. Teams will always be in the game against them because of the tempo and subbing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, BlkMamba24 said:

You do know after the 10th foul the clock doesn’t keep putting fouls up smdh and i stand corrected it was 13. Nevertheless before you open your mouths make sure you watch the enire game .West Brook isn’t even close to 15-20 points better than Ozen or anyone else. Teams will always be in the game against them because of the tempo and subbing. 

Will you be addressing Yeoj's last post?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,933
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    jacobmartin
    Newest Member
    jacobmartin
    Joined


  • Posts

    • Of course Trump’s prosecution is political, but if paying hush money is illegal, then there is no difference.  I’d say it’s more like ham sandwich/turkey sandwich. 
    • Coach Foster and I had talked earlier in the season and he told me this might be his last year to coach but still wasn't sure. Well, he is sure now. It's been a great privilege to cover his teams. I always enjoy watching his teams play. They are always one of the best coached teams year in and year out. But it's more of an honor and privilege to call Kevin my friend. He is just an absolute great man. He and his dad are the reasons I am a big Big Sandy fan. I will miss Coach on the sidelines. Just won't be the same without him. But I also know we will keep in touch and he will be greeting me when I attend Wildcat basketball games. Congrats Coach Foster!!! Job well done my friend!
    • Yeah, I got that but talk about a stretch. It should seem obvious that Trump’s prosecution is purely political. If someone is going to do a whataboutism, at least make it similar.  This is so ludicrous that it’s like comparing a ham sandwich to a wallet.   
    • You consistently try to say Trump ran our debt up and that the stock market and job market cratered during his administration (along with other MSNBC talking points). That is a flat out LIE, and you know it. Not only are you telling a mistruth, you knowingly are telling a mistruth...which is a blatant LIE...which makes you a "(I don't remember what word you used to describe Trump, something like a purse for dirt)" does it not? You know for a fact that the economy, stock market, and job market was thriving under Trump. You know that the Democrats controlled the house, and proposed a budget that would hurt the economy, in which he shut down the government. Even after this fiasco brought on by Democrats, our economy flourished under his administration. Then Covid19 hit, and the blue states shut down the country. YOU KNOW THIS, but continue to blame Trump. You lie...blatantly. Again, what do we call these people that partake in disseminating misleading information. You coined it...that purse thing. Does the shoe fit? I bet it does. It is amazing that you try to put "MAGA people" into this little box for the soul purpose of allowing all negative attributes of anyone that will vote for Trump instead of Biden to be attributed. That is a sickening modus operandi of stupid people. It is hard for me to believe that you would adopt that childish stereotyping. But since you are willing, I'm willing to push back. I'm a Trump supporter. I will gladly vote for him over Biden. So get busy putting me in your silly little box of stereotypes so I can embarrass you some more. You've been shot down by practically everyone on this board when you say stuff like Trump is their Messiah, or that supporters overlook his flaws. Everyone on this board has stated that they don't agree with Trump on much of his behavior, but you ignore these statements and continue with your lies. Oh yeah, since I'm a Trump supporter, those comments were also directed directly at me. So let's go. Prove I'm a simpleton that will ignore all of Trump's flaws and vow to disown the bad ol' orangeman. Let's continue that diatribe you peddle. I now am interested in responding. I also have boxes I can place people in. Whose box is accurate? Better yet, whose box is more embarrassing? I'm fairly certain your box is more entertaining for the board to make fun of. TDS should be included in the DSM-6, or revise the DSM-5 to include it since this phenomenon is so pervasive now. You are a walking, talking picture of Trump Derangement Syndrome. Do you like that box? Can you refute the rationale for placing you in that box. Everyone can refute your rationale for placing them into your irrational box, while you languish in your TDS box.
    • Clinton got impeached because of it. David Pecker said it was true about Stormy today. Under oath.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...