Jump to content

21-5a vs. 22-5a


TradenupBH

Recommended Posts

There are no moral victories but it helps a little I guess seeing 2 teams Central lost to and another one we just edged out moving on to the 2nd round.  I actually see 2 of the 3 moving on to at least round 3. Guess we know which district was the best this year.  Congratulations Titans, Bulldogs and Indians.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/11/2017 at 10:37 PM, Davidp0403 said:

Png Crosby game gonna be like a 70-69 type of game both excellent os and inconsistent ds 

I have a pile of cash to invest.... Can you tell me how to be a millionaire?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, robanadana said:

Our football program has definitely turned the corner. We lost a lot last year to graduation and and still managed to put a good team on the field. I would just like to get the fourth place team from 21-5A for once instead of taking the district champ to the wire every year.

The wing/slot "T"   

I hate it, and nobody wants to admit this. but it's an unpursued, silent recruitment. The Stud wants to play for the team that the virtuous athlete fits to... Vidor is:  RBs but not OL... LBs but no DBs...  No WRs... No QBs... No DLine.  A couple few extra BIG, homegrown, coachable athletes and VIDOR is RAGING 5 rounds deep with "T" perfection.   Matthews is doing what is necessary.   He's playing the odds and Yahtzee happens.  Look out because it happens

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, badndn said:

They just need to complete 80% of the 5 or 6 wide open passes that they do attempt instead of 30%. 

Agreed, better route running finding the soft spots will produce a higher completion  percentage. I think we need to throw from the shotgun instead of under center in order to give the qb more passing time .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, fretbro6 said:

The wing/slot "T"   

I hate it, and nobody wants to admit this. but it's an unpursued, silent recruitment. The Stud wants to play for the team that the virtuous athlete fits to... Vidor is:  RBs but not OL... LBs but no DBs...  No WRs... No QBs... No DLine.  A couple few extra BIG, homegrown, coachable athletes and VIDOR is RAGING 5 rounds deep with "T" perfection.   Matthews is doing what is necessary.   He's playing the odds and Yahtzee happens.  Look out because it happens

Honestly in my opinion qb's make this offense even that much more lethal. Ask quirante and geth simmons.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,935
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    jacobmartin
    Newest Member
    jacobmartin
    Joined



  • Posts

    • Actually I wasn’t responding to your comment. It was funny. I was using your comment to take issue with baddog’s comparison. 😎
    • I mean the baseball kids aren’t even doing football after school, they go to baseball… baseball kids get about a hour during the period. 
    • That is yet to be determined in trial. ”Taking” in the Fifth Amendment doesn’t mean ownership, title changing hands, etc. A government can “take” your property without “taking” your properties.  That has been true.  This issue is, did Texas take the property under the Fifth Amendment and subsequent Supreme Court rulings and not the dictionary definition of “taking”. As always in the law, definitions matter. 
    • Wrong again. This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up   The day that Trump took office, our nation debt stood at 19.9 Trillion dollars (End of Q4, 2016).  After his tax cuts (without corresponding cuts in spending), the national debt stood at 23.2 Trillion dollars at the end of Q1 of 2020 that was the Start of COVID, FYI... Or a total increase in debt of almost 17% during Trump's first three years (and one quarter) in office.  At the end of his reign (with COVID spending for which Trump himself signed off on) was at 27.7 Trillion Dollars.  That's a 39% increase in the National Debt while Trump was in office.  For further reference, Biden inherited a 27.7 Trillion dollar debt to start.  At the end of Q4 2023, the debt stands at 34 Trillion.  That's an increase of 19% over the first three years. I know that math and facts hurt your feelings, but Trump was horrible for the country before he allowed "them Dirty Democrats to shut down the economy."  Anybody that says "Trump was good for the country" doesn't know the first thing about micro/macro economics or the effects of deficit spending.  Trump hurt us like no other president, period.  Anybody that says "Trump was good for the economy" is actually stating for the rest of us with some sense "I don't know what I'm talking about."
    • But of course you wouldn’t understand the saying. You’re so clever. Your education precedes you. 
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...