Jump to content

Roy Moore

new tobie

By new tobie
in Political Forum

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 199
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Hagar
Hagar

Seems they've already found a flaw in the story.  She claimed Moore called her on her bedroom phone.  Her mom said she didn't have a bedroom phone then.  And from what I've read, there's no proof.  Na

BS Wildcats
BS Wildcats

If proven true, he deserves his punishment.  But, it is funny they would wait to now to say something.  

six burg
six burg

Doesn't really matter which party affiliation.

jv_coach

jv_coach

Posted
Posted

I suspect a bunch of Roy Moore’s increased support is coming from evangelicals because they, like I, are starting to assume any ugly thing out of a liberal’s mouth is just another lie. Also, that if the Left is against someone or something, we should assume that person or cause is worthy of our support.

The left for years has adopted the idea that “truth” is whatever supports your goals. If destroying Roy Moore’s candidacy is to be achieved, all methods are valid. The “authors” of the despicable Protocols of the Elders of Zion were amateurs in comparison to today’s Left. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
stevenash

stevenash

Posted
Posted

Don't you find it interesting that all of the "accusers" in the Herman Cain situation seemed to have dried up and gone away?  I don't think any of them carried their "traumatic issues" forward after he withdrew from the race.  There were several accusers in this circumstance and it seems as though somebody on here suggested that multiple accusers makes the "case" much more credible.  I guess their "desire to protect other likely victims in the future" disappeared as soon as they were paid and when Mr. Cain withdrew from the race.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LumRaiderFan

LumRaiderFan

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, stevenash said:

Don't you find it interesting that all of the "accusers" in the Herman Cain situation seemed to have dried up and gone away?  I don't think any of them carried their "traumatic issues" forward after he withdrew from the race.  There were several accusers in this circumstance and it seems as though somebody on here suggested that multiple accusers makes the "case" much more credible.  I guess their "desire to protect other likely victims in the future" disappeared as soon as they were paid and when Mr. Cain withdrew from the race.

I guess this was simply a case of "Democratic mission accomplished"!

...move on to the next victim candidate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LumRaiderFan

LumRaiderFan

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, TxHoops said:

Mitch McConnell calling for Roy to step down as other women come forward.  Pence soon to join the Remove Roy movement?

This is the hidden content, please

 

Don't know how this will turn out but one things for sure, the Republicans sure don't circle the wagons like Democrats...thank God.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TxHoops

TxHoops

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, stevenash said:

Hoops- could this be a "case that is winnable but it is cheaper ( in a variety of ways) to capitulate?

 Could be Nash.  It’s worse than the “normal” because it involves (allegedly) underage girls.  McConnell has been more vocal than what I expected by coming out and saying he believes the women.  I will be interested in what Pence’s position will be.  There is much I don’t agree with him on but I don’t doubt he’s a man of faith.  This is just a very, very difficult situation.  And one of the reasons I want Moore to be innocent.  I’m tired of guys thumping their Bibles and turning out to be scumbags (see the Catholic priest scandal).  There’s more than the state of Alabama or our country involved here.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TxHoops

TxHoops

Posted
Posted
54 minutes ago, LumRaiderFan said:

Don't know how this will turn out but one things for sure, the Republicans sure don't circle the wagons like Democrats...thank God.

Me either.  It’s just a terrible situation, no matter who is telling the truth.  From the GOP’s standpoint, this is an election they really can’t lose without something like this.  And he still will likely win.  But I’m sure they would rather someone less controversial in their camp.   But McConnell says he believes the women so I will try not to be cynical and take him at his word. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PhatMack19

PhatMack19

Posted
Posted

Interesting......

This is the hidden content, please

 


I'm also seeing where in the signature "Roy Moore/D.A." the signature is lifted from the divorce papers signed by the judge. The signature in the yearbook is identical to the signature on the divorce papers. And, the D.A is the initials of the Judge's assistant, who applied a signature stamp to the divorce papers. Hmmmm....

Twitter reports, You decide.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Reagan

Reagan

Posted
Posted

 

Everyone needs to watch this.  Hannity will read a response from Roy Moore. One part in particular is interesting:  Back in 1999, one of Moore's accusers came before Moore in a divorce case in which she was involved in.  Moore was NEVER asked to recuse himself.  Plus the lady showed no distress appearing before Moore at that time.  This is opposed to the total distress she shows now.  Watch it and see what you think.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TxHoops

TxHoops

Posted
Posted
18 hours ago, stevenash said:

TxHoops- it is my understanding that of all the allegations against Mr. Moore, none have come in the form of a sworn statement.  If that is true, does that not raise some questions regarding validity?

Not sure if that’s true but it wouldn’t surprise me.  As to questions of validity or the veracity of the allegations, sworn statements are stronger legally speaking than those that aren’t.  Obviously when you swear to something under the penalty of perjury, there is at least a potential punishment for lying. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Member Statistics

    45,932
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    TRUTHTELLER409
    Newest Member
    TRUTHTELLER409
    Joined


  • Posts

    • Englebert
      It’s kinda weird…

      By Englebert · Posted

      You consistently try to say Trump ran our debt up and that the stock market and job market cratered during his administration (along with other MSNBC talking points). That is a flat out LIE, and you know it. Not only are you telling a mistruth, you knowingly are telling a mistruth...which is a blatant LIE...which makes you a dirtbag does it not? You know for a fact that the economy, stock market, and job market was thriving under Trump. You know that the Democrats controlled the house, and proposed a budget that would hurt the economy, in which he shut down the government. Even after this fiasco brought on by Democrats, our economy flourished under his administration. Then Covid19 hit, and the blue states shut down the country. YOU KNOW THIS, but continue to blame Trump. You lie...blatantly. Again, what do we call these people that partake in disseminating misleading information. You coined it...Dirtbags. Does the shoe fit? I bet it does. It is amazing that you try to put "MAGA people" into this little box for the soul purpose of allowing all negative attributes of anyone that will vote for Trump instead of Biden to be attributed. That is a sickening modus operandi of stupid people. It is hard for me to believe that you would adopt that childish stereotyping. But since you are willing, I'm willing to push back. I'm a Trump supporter. I will gladly vote for him over Biden. So get busy putting me in your silly little box of stereotypes so I can embarrass you some more. You've been shot down by practically everyone on this board when you say stuff like Trump is their Messiah, or that supporters overlook his flaws. Everyone on this board has stated that they don't agree with Trump on much of his behavior, but you ignore these statements and continue with your lies. Oh yeah, since I'm a Trump supporter, those comment were also directed directly at me. So let's go. Prove I'm a simpleton that will ignore all of Trump's flaws and vow to disown the bad ol' orangeman. Let's continue that diatribe you peddle. I now am interested in responding. I also have boxes I can place people in. Whose box is accurate? Better yet, whose box is more embarrassing? I'm fairly certain your box is more entertaining for the board to make fun of. TDS should be included in the DSM-6, or revise the DSM-5 to include it since this phenomenon is so pervasive now. You are a walking, talking picture of Trump Derangement Syndrome. Do you like that box? Can you refute the rationale for placing you in that box. Everyone can refute your rationale for placing them into your irrational box, while you languish in your TDS box.
    • UT alum
      It’s kinda weird…

      By UT alum · Posted

      Clinton got impeached because of it. David Pecker said it was true about Stormy today. Under oath.
    • UT alum
      It’s kinda weird…

      By UT alum · Posted

      Election interference. Cheating.
    • UT alum
      It’s kinda weird…

      By UT alum · Posted

      It’s not about worrying about Trump’s morality. It’s about him being held to a totally hypocritical standard that is applied to anybody else that’s not him. Double it if it happens to be a Democrat. What he did to Ted Cruz in 2016, for example. Accused him of extramarital affairs. Really? And the gang cheered the Master on. Sick is what it is.
    • UT alum
      It’s kinda weird…

      By UT alum · Posted

      Totally false equivalence. Backer is talking about candidate morality, not geopolitical policy positions. Professional whatabout players, you bunch, schooled by the Master.

  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...