Jump to content

Roy Moore


new tobie

Recommended Posts

I suspect a bunch of Roy Moore’s increased support is coming from evangelicals because they, like I, are starting to assume any ugly thing out of a liberal’s mouth is just another lie. Also, that if the Left is against someone or something, we should assume that person or cause is worthy of our support.

The left for years has adopted the idea that “truth” is whatever supports your goals. If destroying Roy Moore’s candidacy is to be achieved, all methods are valid. The “authors” of the despicable Protocols of the Elders of Zion were amateurs in comparison to today’s Left. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't you find it interesting that all of the "accusers" in the Herman Cain situation seemed to have dried up and gone away?  I don't think any of them carried their "traumatic issues" forward after he withdrew from the race.  There were several accusers in this circumstance and it seems as though somebody on here suggested that multiple accusers makes the "case" much more credible.  I guess their "desire to protect other likely victims in the future" disappeared as soon as they were paid and when Mr. Cain withdrew from the race.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, stevenash said:

Don't you find it interesting that all of the "accusers" in the Herman Cain situation seemed to have dried up and gone away?  I don't think any of them carried their "traumatic issues" forward after he withdrew from the race.  There were several accusers in this circumstance and it seems as though somebody on here suggested that multiple accusers makes the "case" much more credible.  I guess their "desire to protect other likely victims in the future" disappeared as soon as they were paid and when Mr. Cain withdrew from the race.

I guess this was simply a case of "Democratic mission accomplished"!

...move on to the next victim candidate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, TxHoops said:

Mitch McConnell calling for Roy to step down as other women come forward.  Pence soon to join the Remove Roy movement?

This is the hidden content, please

 

Don't know how this will turn out but one things for sure, the Republicans sure don't circle the wagons like Democrats...thank God.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, stevenash said:

Hoops- could this be a "case that is winnable but it is cheaper ( in a variety of ways) to capitulate?

 Could be Nash.  It’s worse than the “normal” because it involves (allegedly) underage girls.  McConnell has been more vocal than what I expected by coming out and saying he believes the women.  I will be interested in what Pence’s position will be.  There is much I don’t agree with him on but I don’t doubt he’s a man of faith.  This is just a very, very difficult situation.  And one of the reasons I want Moore to be innocent.  I’m tired of guys thumping their Bibles and turning out to be scumbags (see the Catholic priest scandal).  There’s more than the state of Alabama or our country involved here.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, LumRaiderFan said:

Don't know how this will turn out but one things for sure, the Republicans sure don't circle the wagons like Democrats...thank God.

Me either.  It’s just a terrible situation, no matter who is telling the truth.  From the GOP’s standpoint, this is an election they really can’t lose without something like this.  And he still will likely win.  But I’m sure they would rather someone less controversial in their camp.   But McConnell says he believes the women so I will try not to be cynical and take him at his word. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting......

This is the hidden content, please

 


I'm also seeing where in the signature "Roy Moore/D.A." the signature is lifted from the divorce papers signed by the judge. The signature in the yearbook is identical to the signature on the divorce papers. And, the D.A is the initials of the Judge's assistant, who applied a signature stamp to the divorce papers. Hmmmm....

Twitter reports, You decide.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Everyone needs to watch this.  Hannity will read a response from Roy Moore. One part in particular is interesting:  Back in 1999, one of Moore's accusers came before Moore in a divorce case in which she was involved in.  Moore was NEVER asked to recuse himself.  Plus the lady showed no distress appearing before Moore at that time.  This is opposed to the total distress she shows now.  Watch it and see what you think.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, stevenash said:

TxHoops- it is my understanding that of all the allegations against Mr. Moore, none have come in the form of a sworn statement.  If that is true, does that not raise some questions regarding validity?

Not sure if that’s true but it wouldn’t surprise me.  As to questions of validity or the veracity of the allegations, sworn statements are stronger legally speaking than those that aren’t.  Obviously when you swear to something under the penalty of perjury, there is at least a potential punishment for lying. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,924
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    TRUTHTELLER409
    Newest Member
    TRUTHTELLER409
    Joined



  • Posts

    • That there’s not a single thread on the fact that the Republican nominee is on trial for paying off a porn star with whom he had an affair while the future First Lady was carrying said nominee’s child.    I remember back when the dirty, no-good Dems sacked Gary Hart over something similar. Same thing with John Edwards and later Anthony Weiner.    But y’all keep pretending God is on your side, lol. 
    • I hear what you’re saying, BUT… that hammers the hell out of poor people and the ones with multiple properties don’t eat any more than the poor ones. In fact, you’d basically just be taxing a lot of peoples’ EBT payments. The government  can’t get ahead by taxing what they’re already borrowing to give to people.    I think well off people should pay more… but the scale as it exists is broken.    For the sake of argument, my mom’s house in Groves is valued at $125k. 2/1/1 on a slab.  Her tax bill is $850/year. Without exemptions, her bill would be 3200. It’s right on JCAD’s website. The problem is this…. If someone tries to rent out an identical house, they’d expect to get, what… $1200/month? If you take into account that homeowners/windstorm/flood is a minimum of another $2k per year, you’d need $5k a year just to cover the taxes and insurance. That’s four months (1/3 of the year) just to cover those costs, not counting a potential mortgage payment. But then everybody cries about how expensive rents are… you can’t tax the hell out of non-homestead property to make up for gifts given to homeowners in the form of big tax cuts. It just doesn’t work.    Ten acres in Lumberton? I’ve got a buddy with 10 acres in Lumberton on HWY 69. Prime property… it’s his retirement plan. Sale it one day and cash in. The CAD decided that it no longer qualifies for a special use valuation (timber) and stripped his “exemption.” His 2023 tax bill jumped from $25 to $22,000…. It’s insane.  
    • I’m curious what happened… they aren’t even in full pads yet. 
    • They’re going to have win almost all remaining games and get finals of tournament to think about an at-large. When LU was in the WAC, Grand Canyon got an at-large after New Mexico St came out of nowhere to win conference tournament. Grand Canyon had a dang good resume that year. It can happen, but resume wise isn’t in their favor.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...