Jump to content

World Series- Houston Astros vs Los Angeles Dodgers


Recommended Posts

Tue., Oct. 24: Game 1, Astros at Dodgers
Wed. Oct. 25: Game 2, Astros at Dodgers
Fri. Oct. 27: Game 3, Dodgers at Astros
Sat. Oct. 28: Game 4, Dodgers at Astros
Sun. Oct. 29: Game 5*, Dodgers at Astros
Tue. Oct. 31: Game 6*, Astros at Dodgers
Wed. Nov. 1: Game 7*, Astros at Dodgers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, PhatMack19 said:

Tue., Oct. 24: Game 1, Astros at Dodgers
Wed. Oct. 25: Game 2, Astros at Dodgers
Fri. Oct. 27: Game 3, Dodgers at Astros
Sat. Oct. 28: Game 4, Dodgers at Astros
Sun. Oct. 29: Game 5*, Dodgers at Astros
Tue. Oct. 31: Game 6*, Astros at Dodgers
Wed. Nov. 1: Game 7*, Astros at Dodgers

How are they handling the DH?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, king said:

We just need to steal one in LA and we got this..

I really don’t like the 2-3-2 format even though it could benefit Houston this time. If Houston wins a game on the road they could close out the series at home. The team that earned home field advantage could end up with 1 less home game.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like the Astros in this series. The lefty on lefty matchup in game one is going to be a great matchup. This game will be big for the Astros, if they can win this game it will be a series changer. Game 2 I think is the Astros to lose. Dodgers haven't faced Verlander, and the Astros are very familiar to Darvish. The Astros need to get the Dodgers starters out early. They don't have the depth the Yankees do, but they have have better offense. With Keuchel, Verlander, and McCullers dealing like they have I like the Astros chances. Also this McHugh will play a big roll in this series. He pitched 4 hit less innings, then was never used again. Also, Gregerson looked good in his 2/3 of an inning. Hinch and the coaches need to use figure out the bullpen, because the Dodgers are patient and run pitch counts up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, About a week ago said:

I like the Astros in this series. The lefty on lefty matchup in game one is going to be a great matchup. This game will be big for the Astros, if they can win this game it will be a series changer. Game 2 I think is the Astros to lose. Dodgers haven't faced Verlander, and the Astros are very familiar to Darvish. The Astros need to get the Dodgers starters out early. They don't have the depth the Yankees do, but they have have better offense. With Keuchel, Verlander, and McCullers dealing like they have I like the Astros chances. Also this McHugh will play a big roll in this series. He pitched 4 hit less innings, then was never used again. Also, Gregerson looked good in his 2/3 of an inning. Hinch and the coaches need to use figure out the bullpen, because the Dodgers are patient and run pitch counts up.

I actually think Rich Hill will be the game 2 starter for the Dodgers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/22/2017 at 11:32 AM, About a week ago said:

I like the Astros in this series. The lefty on lefty matchup in game one is going to be a great matchup. This game will be big for the Astros, if they can win this game it will be a series changer. Game 2 I think is the Astros to lose. Dodgers haven't faced Verlander, and the Astros are very familiar to Darvish. The Astros need to get the Dodgers starters out early. They don't have the depth the Yankees do, but they have have better offense. With Keuchel, Verlander, and McCullers dealing like they have I like the Astros chances. Also this McHugh will play a big roll in this series. He pitched 4 hit less innings, then was never used again. Also, Gregerson looked good in his 2/3 of an inning. Hinch and the coaches need to use figure out the bullpen, because the Dodgers are patient and run pitch counts up.

Good analysis.  Hope you're right!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,935
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    jacobmartin
    Newest Member
    jacobmartin
    Joined



  • Posts

    • Judge Aileen Cannon unsealed a trove of documents Monday that appear to reveal a coordinated effort within the JoeBama administration to target Donald Trump with political prosecution after he left office. This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up
    • This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  
    • Diboll - 1  Central Heights- 0
    • Just to expound a little further, so you are not confused...I, along with so many others, are laughing at your desperation. You are working overtime, nay, double even triple time, trying to convince normal people Trump was bad for the country. His policies provided for peace all over the world, low gas prices, low food prices, energy independence, closed border, low inflation, record low unemployment, and on and on and on. You try to counter this narrative by saying unemployment skyrocketed on his watch. You said this knowing full well the unemployment rate went up due to Covid. Your narrative is just so laughable, to the point of side-splitting hilarity. Who would even attempt this asinine narrative? Now, even if you get past the utter stupidity of that MSNBC talking point, you provide another side-splitting hilarious tidbit of evidence to back your claim of Trump being bad for the country. You actually tried to tie the stock market going down to Trump...after Covid. You, I, and everybody else knows the stock market was flourishing under Trump...until Covid hit. This argument is just as bad as the other one. Again, who would even attempt this narrative? The only thing you could remotely muster that had any sliver of truthfulness, is that spending increased. Sure, Trump rebuilt the military and gave them a deserved raise. But he also had to shut down the government due to Democrats demanding an even more, and very detrimental, increase in spending. And in a true extremely exaggerated fashion, you proclaim that spending "skyrocketed". Again, who would even attempt this narrative? I think I can smell the desperation. Do you have any other whoppers to contribute?
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...