Jump to content

PAM vs PNG

pakronos

By pakronos
in High School Football

 Share

Recommended Posts

NDNation

NDNation

Posted
Posted
33 minutes ago, Reagan said:

No.  But I've seen PAM's defense.  And, again, PN-G has beaten teams with a combined record of 7-19.  And, again, Nederland was scoring a bunch of points until they ran into PAM's defense.

So you're  comparing Nederlands offense to PNG's offense. Because Ned couldn't score, PNG won't be able to?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 242
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

TenaciousK
TenaciousK

Here's what I love about team sports... you don't need the best players, you just need the right players. You need guys that will fight every play, never give up, outwork, outhit, and outlast the oppo

Stattrax
Stattrax

Everyone drinks a different kool aid.... PAM will put up points especially if Hines is back 100%. PNG will need to play its best defensive 4 quarters of the year in order to win...

L-Train11
L-Train11

A great defense verses a great offense. Gonna be fun to watch, wish I could  see it!!

Hagar

Hagar

Posted
Posted

I think a much better PAM team will show up Friday.  I think the Indians are flying high.  Who's going to win?  I'm reminded of many years ago when I went to Evangeline Downs to watch Thorobred horse racing.  One particular race two horses were neck and neck at the wire and the announcer, instead of calling a winner said, Who do you like?  That was a good race.  This is going to be a good football game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
FrodoNDN

FrodoNDN

Posted
Posted

I do believe both teams will come to play. We MUST wrap up and tackle. If not, it will be a long night. Curious to see if we will be able to move the ball running. Haven't seen the PAM D but they were quick last year so i expect they will be again this year. I have a feeling our H backs will get more than usual passes in this game which is ok because they are both big and can catch and run. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Raider24

Raider24

Posted
Posted
7 hours ago, FrodoNDN said:

I do believe both teams will come to play. We MUST wrap up and tackle. If not, it will be a long night. Curious to see if we will be able to move the ball running. Haven't seen the PAM D but they were quick last year so i expect they will be again this year. I have a feeling our H backs will get more than usual passes in this game which is ok because they are both big and can catch and run. 

One thing we did do was able to move the chains running and with a few penalties on PAM. Depends on how committed you will be to the running game. Ward was 25-119yds. That front is damn good! It also helped having a short field at times due to special teams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
prepballfan

prepballfan

Posted
Posted
13 hours ago, Reagan said:

The first word was fairly clear.  But I do know that the competition (7-19 record) has been pretty bad so far.  Have you seen PAM's defense? 

Yes you are right and yes I saw a couple of game tapes on PAM. I, however, do not believe it to be a fair comparison to lump Nederland and PN-Gs offenses together. Two very different offenses. PNG has played a half a game every week. Trying to runout the clock from the half every week the entire season. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
pakronos

pakronos

Posted
  • Author
Posted
7 hours ago, Raider24 said:

One thing we did do was able to move the chains running and with a few penalties on PAM. Depends on how committed you will be to the running game. Ward was 25-119yds. That front is damn good! It also helped having a short field at times due to special teams.

one of those runs was for 35- 40 yards

Link to comment
Share on other sites
pakronos

pakronos

Posted
  • Author
Posted
34 minutes ago, Tigers2010 said:

Lumberton has set the bar pretty high with 19, more than double the total from Nederland, Ozen, and Central combined. 

Should be a great match up  between PNG Offense/PAM defense

if you seen HOW they scored, it's not against PAM's defense. it was two special team plays that were pretty much identical. bad snap, blocked punt rolls into the endzone=td. they scored once on PAM's defense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
pakronos

pakronos

Posted
  • Author
Posted

okay, I see MOST people from both sides are being realistic and not fan boys. the people saying PNG is going to run away with it, sit down. I still have PAM losing 35-24. my reasons IMO are valid. unless Harrison put 5 db's  in the secondary, I see NOBODY stopping Riggs and Hughs, assuming Hughs will play some at WR. I'm not worried about PNG or boy wonder running on us to put on a clinic like hines did to them last year. I do expect Johnson to get one or two 40 yard runs. I expect the injuns to be held under 110 on the ground.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Raider24

Raider24

Posted
Posted
20 minutes ago, pakronos said:

if you seen HOW they scored, it's not against PAM's defense. it was two special team plays that were pretty much identical. bad snap, blocked punt rolls into the endzone=td. they scored once on PAM's defense.

Twice, the 30 yard run off of the low snap on punt attempt that gave Lumberton the ball inside the 40 and the 20 yd pass in the 4th qtr. Blocked punt was recovered in the end zone for TD.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Member Statistics

    45,933
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    jacobmartin
    Newest Member
    jacobmartin
    Joined


  • Posts

    • tvc184
      It’s kinda weird…

      By tvc184 · Posted

      Yeah, I got that but talk about a stretch. It should seem obvious that Trump’s prosecution is purely political. If someone is going to do a whataboutism, at least make it similar.  This is so ludicrous that it’s like comparing a ham sandwich to a wallet.   
    • Englebert
      It’s kinda weird…

      By Englebert · Posted

      You consistently try to say Trump ran our debt up and that the stock market and job market cratered during his administration (along with other MSNBC talking points). That is a flat out LIE, and you know it. Not only are you telling a mistruth, you knowingly are telling a mistruth...which is a blatant LIE...which makes you a "(I don't remember what word you used to describe Trump, something like a purse for dirt)" does it not? You know for a fact that the economy, stock market, and job market was thriving under Trump. You know that the Democrats controlled the house, and proposed a budget that would hurt the economy, in which he shut down the government. Even after this fiasco brought on by Democrats, our economy flourished under his administration. Then Covid19 hit, and the blue states shut down the country. YOU KNOW THIS, but continue to blame Trump. You lie...blatantly. Again, what do we call these people that partake in disseminating misleading information. You coined it...that purse thing. Does the shoe fit? I bet it does. It is amazing that you try to put "MAGA people" into this little box for the soul purpose of allowing all negative attributes of anyone that will vote for Trump instead of Biden to be attributed. That is a sickening modus operandi of stupid people. It is hard for me to believe that you would adopt that childish stereotyping. But since you are willing, I'm willing to push back. I'm a Trump supporter. I will gladly vote for him over Biden. So get busy putting me in your silly little box of stereotypes so I can embarrass you some more. You've been shot down by practically everyone on this board when you say stuff like Trump is their Messiah, or that supporters overlook his flaws. Everyone on this board has stated that they don't agree with Trump on much of his behavior, but you ignore these statements and continue with your lies. Oh yeah, since I'm a Trump supporter, those comments were also directed directly at me. So let's go. Prove I'm a simpleton that will ignore all of Trump's flaws and vow to disown the bad ol' orangeman. Let's continue that diatribe you peddle. I now am interested in responding. I also have boxes I can place people in. Whose box is accurate? Better yet, whose box is more embarrassing? I'm fairly certain your box is more entertaining for the board to make fun of. TDS should be included in the DSM-6, or revise the DSM-5 to include it since this phenomenon is so pervasive now. You are a walking, talking picture of Trump Derangement Syndrome. Do you like that box? Can you refute the rationale for placing you in that box. Everyone can refute your rationale for placing them into your irrational box, while you languish in your TDS box.
    • UT alum
      It’s kinda weird…

      By UT alum · Posted

      Clinton got impeached because of it. David Pecker said it was true about Stormy today. Under oath.
    • UT alum
      It’s kinda weird…

      By UT alum · Posted

      Election interference. Cheating.
    • UT alum
      It’s kinda weird…

      By UT alum · Posted

      It’s not about worrying about Trump’s morality. It’s about him being held to a totally hypocritical standard that is applied to anybody else that’s not him. Double it if it happens to be a Democrat. What he did to Ted Cruz in 2016, for example. Accused him of extramarital affairs. Really? And the gang cheered the Master on. Sick is what it is.

  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...