Jump to content

Vidor @ Lumberton


Recommended Posts

if vidor plays like they did the past 3 weeks then i see us walking away with it. I mean think of it this way. Ned held pam to 13 points but gave us 21. And Lumberton defense let Pam score 31 on them. So I see our offense rolling and defense getting enough stops to win. As long as the refs don't interfere then we should be fine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Vpirate02 said:

if vidor plays like they did the past 3 weeks then i see us walking away with it. I mean think of it this way. Ned held pam to 13 points but gave us 21. And Lumberton defense let Pam score 31 on them. So I see our offense rolling and defense getting enough stops to win. As long as the refs don't interfere then we should be fine.

Then there's the other side of it. Nederland scored 28 on Vidor but only 7 on PAM, and lumberton scored 19 on PAM. I think Vidor wins it though. Probably 42-21

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Vpirate02 said:

if vidor plays like they did the past 3 weeks then i see us walking away with it. I mean think of it this way. Ned held pam to 13 points but gave us 21. And Lumberton defense let Pam score 31 on them. So I see our offense rolling and defense getting enough stops to win. As long as the refs don't interfere then we should be fine.

Should be a good game!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, L-Train11 said:

Can’t afford to lose any more

Well the Raiders played a good ballgame today.  And Ltown plays D against the Slot T about as well as anyone.  And I'll echo Vpirate02, Vidor has played Ltown several times when I thought Vidor should win, and they end up losing.

Game should be close.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

we’re obviously much more evenly matched against a team like Vidor. I think we will score a lot and hopefully make some stops and grab the W.

I Said this at the beginning of the year and got laughed at, but the 3rd place spot is not out of our reach. And if we win out which is definitely possible then we will grab that spot. We competed with a tough  Pam team tonight, I think our players should hold their heads high and be ready for this battle!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, pakronos said:

I got Vidor... not to crap on lumberton, but if those snaps on the blocked punts wasn't rolling on the ground, you score once. Penalties kept lumberton drives going.

I know what you’re saying, but over 200 yards of offense on a defense like y’all is pretty impressive. Y’all should be the best defense we face this year. I know there aren’t any moral victories in football, but I will say I’m proud of the direction our program is going. We need to improve, young on defense which hurts us, but we’re getting there. I know for a team like y’all and PNG that doesn’t make sense because y’all are used to winning, but for Lumberton we gotta have something to keep hope alive while we build upon what we got going.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, L-Train11 said:

I know what you’re saying, but over 200 yards of offense on a defense like y’all is pretty impressive. Y’all should be the best defense we face this year. I know there aren’t any moral victories in football, but I will say I’m proud of the direction our program is going. We need to improve, young on defense which hurts us, but we’re getting there. I know for a team like y’all and PNG that doesn’t make sense because y’all are used to winning, but for Lumberton we gotta have something to keep hope alive while we build upon what we got going.

Man I can't wait till next friday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,933
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    jacobmartin
    Newest Member
    jacobmartin
    Joined



  • Posts

    • Yeah, I got that but talk about a stretch. It should seem obvious that Trump’s prosecution is purely political. If someone is going to do a whataboutism, at least make it similar.  This is so ludicrous that it’s like comparing a ham sandwich to a wallet.   
    • You consistently try to say Trump ran our debt up and that the stock market and job market cratered during his administration (along with other MSNBC talking points). That is a flat out LIE, and you know it. Not only are you telling a mistruth, you knowingly are telling a mistruth...which is a blatant LIE...which makes you a "(I don't remember what word you used to describe Trump, something like a purse for dirt)" does it not? You know for a fact that the economy, stock market, and job market was thriving under Trump. You know that the Democrats controlled the house, and proposed a budget that would hurt the economy, in which he shut down the government. Even after this fiasco brought on by Democrats, our economy flourished under his administration. Then Covid19 hit, and the blue states shut down the country. YOU KNOW THIS, but continue to blame Trump. You lie...blatantly. Again, what do we call these people that partake in disseminating misleading information. You coined it...that purse thing. Does the shoe fit? I bet it does. It is amazing that you try to put "MAGA people" into this little box for the soul purpose of allowing all negative attributes of anyone that will vote for Trump instead of Biden to be attributed. That is a sickening modus operandi of stupid people. It is hard for me to believe that you would adopt that childish stereotyping. But since you are willing, I'm willing to push back. I'm a Trump supporter. I will gladly vote for him over Biden. So get busy putting me in your silly little box of stereotypes so I can embarrass you some more. You've been shot down by practically everyone on this board when you say stuff like Trump is their Messiah, or that supporters overlook his flaws. Everyone on this board has stated that they don't agree with Trump on much of his behavior, but you ignore these statements and continue with your lies. Oh yeah, since I'm a Trump supporter, those comments were also directed directly at me. So let's go. Prove I'm a simpleton that will ignore all of Trump's flaws and vow to disown the bad ol' orangeman. Let's continue that diatribe you peddle. I now am interested in responding. I also have boxes I can place people in. Whose box is accurate? Better yet, whose box is more embarrassing? I'm fairly certain your box is more entertaining for the board to make fun of. TDS should be included in the DSM-6, or revise the DSM-5 to include it since this phenomenon is so pervasive now. You are a walking, talking picture of Trump Derangement Syndrome. Do you like that box? Can you refute the rationale for placing you in that box. Everyone can refute your rationale for placing them into your irrational box, while you languish in your TDS box.
    • Clinton got impeached because of it. David Pecker said it was true about Stormy today. Under oath.
    • Election interference. Cheating.
    • It’s not about worrying about Trump’s morality. It’s about him being held to a totally hypocritical standard that is applied to anybody else that’s not him. Double it if it happens to be a Democrat. What he did to Ted Cruz in 2016, for example. Accused him of extramarital affairs. Really? And the gang cheered the Master on. Sick is what it is.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...