Jump to content

West Orange-Stark (3-0) vs Kennedale (4-0)


Goblin

Recommended Posts

On 9/30/2017 at 0:37 PM, TxHoops said:

In Nacogdoches. 

As far as the game goes, I would normally favor Kennedale but WOS see the Wing T so much, it isn’t gimmicky to them.  And it is realllly tough to be one dimensional against the chain gang.  For that reason, I would give the Mustangs a small edge. 

I'm going opposite this time with Kennedale.  Watched WOS play Silsbee and they are good but not the same as years past. Don't get me wrong, they are still good, but not as many weapons.  Just my opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Silsbee92 said:

I thought Silsbee limited WOS to big plays.  Problem was...every big play allowed ended up in the end zone except one and it took prob fastest dude in state to keep that from happening.

You have to stop them Everytime or it's to the house. It's tough to keep up that pace the whole game, one bad drive sets you back and then you press.

Silsbee was in it until the above. One bad drive drained their momentum and WOS answered with a TD to put it 27-17.  Fourth quarter is where Stangs put teams away. 

Mentally and then physically.

They will have to pass more though than usual if Watson can't get the edge. If he does, lights out.  Too good in open space.  Defense can be scored on though, not as dominant as last couple years but still very good.

I'm leaning 34-21 WOS. 

Believe it looks a lot like the Silsbee game.  WOS didn't make too many mistakes.  Gotta take advantage when they do.  We didn't.

+1 respect you a lot for this and totally agree

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our point output is 2-3 touchdown fewer and we are giving up more points this year.But Goblin on the other board pointed out even with that we beat all but one team by that margin or more last year.Kennedale scored 21 on us last year and has basically the same team back.You would think by what they have coming back and what we have lost player wise they will score at least 21 plus.This game will put things in perspective for the moment but rest assured the Stangs will only get better as time goes on.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, GUNHO said:

Our point output is 2-3 touchdown fewer and we are giving up more points this year.But Goblin on the other board pointed out even with that we beat all but one team by that margin or more last year.Kennedale scored 21 on us last year and has basically the same team back.You would think by what they have coming back and what we have lost player wise they will score at least 21 plus.This game will put things in perspective for the moment but rest assured the Stangs will only get better as time goes on.  

Way down the road,but the 3,4,5 rounds of the playoffs will have a lot more excitement...gonna be a fun year!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, GUNHO said:

Our point output is 2-3 touchdown fewer and we are giving up more points this year.But Goblin on the other board pointed out even with that we beat all but one team by that margin or more last year.Kennedale scored 21 on us last year and has basically the same team back.You would think by what they have coming back and what we have lost player wise they will score at least 21 plus.This game will put things in perspective for the moment but rest assured the Stangs will only get better as time goes on.  

We also had a 38-0 lead last year and took the foot off of the pedal so that final score is misleading.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, GUNHO said:

Our point output is 2-3 touchdown fewer and we are giving up more points this year.But Goblin on the other board pointed out even with that we beat all but one team by that margin or more last year.Kennedale scored 21 on us last year and has basically the same team back.You would think by what they have coming back and what we have lost player wise they will score at least 21 plus.This game will put things in perspective for the moment but rest assured the Stangs will only get better as time goes on.  

Last year has come and gone.  To compare that team to this one is almost as unfair as what happened on the field for most of the 2016 WOS opponents.  This is a young team and WOS had a young team in 2015 and we know what happened.  I'm not saying they are going to win it all or win squat....no one knows.  What last years Kennedale team did against that team means nothing also.  It was garbage time let downs that allowed this score.  If anything the coaching staff will work to minimize those same letdowns.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, #1stangfan said:

Last year has come and gone.  To compare that team to this one is almost as unfair as what happened on the field for most of the 2016 WOS opponents.  This is a young team and WOS had a young team in 2015 and we know what happened.  I'm not saying they are going to win it all or win squat....no one knows.  What last years Kennedale team did against that team means nothing also.  It was garbage time let downs that allowed this score.  If anything the coaching staff will work to minimize those same letdowns.

I wouldn’t say it means nothing. We have the same coaching staff and some of the same players as do they.  There is an overlap between years that should be taken into account.  Either they will run it and overpower us or trick us.  If they can’t do one of those things well enough they will lose.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello my good people, love all the post great stuff.I just wanna say let's not over hype this game to much.This will not define the mustangs or the Wildcats.IF wos wins doesn't mean that they will go to the state championship and if they lose doesn't mean they won't same for Kennedale it's a game between 2 good teams and that's it. The state tittle will not be decided Saturday. Whoever loses will be ok like, new England and BAMA they can lose a game or 2 I'll bet my life on it in the end they will be there again great posts from all of u guys i love it. The only thing I'm upset about is that I'm stuck in Washington for the next 5 weeks working but I will have my ears on can't wait 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, ATTITUDE IS EVERYTHING said:

Hello my good people, love all the post great stuff.I just wanna say let's not over hype this game to much.This will not define the mustangs or the Wildcats.IF wos wins doesn't mean that they will go to the state championship and if they lose doesn't mean they won't same for Kennedale it's a game between 2 good teams and that's it. The state tittle will not be decided Saturday. Whoever loses will be ok like, new England and BAMA they can lose a game or 2 I'll bet my life on it in the end they will be there again great posts from all of u guys i love it. The only thing I'm upset about is that I'm stuck in Washington for the next 5 weeks working but I will have my ears on can't wait 

 

 

 

Exactly. This is the same thing I said when we played Carthage. Should be a heck of a matchup. I'm still trying to figure out if I can get there or not. Good luck to both.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Goblin said:

I wouldn’t say it means nothing. We have the same coaching staff and some of the same players as do they.  There is an overlap between years that should be taken into account.  Either they will run it and overpower us or trick us.  If they can’t do one of those things well enough they will lose.

I hear you and that is very true.  What even got me started on the post is that I hear/read comparisons between this team and last years team and the fact that WOS is "down" in certain areas.  While it is true, it is about as obvious as saying our rainfall totals are down since Harvey went away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Mustang defense has still only given up one sustained drive for a TD. That would be considered pretty good in any year not following last year.

I think all of Kennedale's late scores were either set up or scored on plays of 50 yards or more. I actually like our chances more if they're stringing together time-consuming drives. But nothing more frustrating than to let a run on you AND get big plays.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Last year's WO-S team was exceptional. The new Mustangs are unique in their own way. I have confidence in their abilities to score and make stops on defense. We will do a good job at running and stopping the run. I don't believe our team is anything like the team the wildcats played last week, so I expect that the (Cats) will be in for a fight to the end and they know it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I remember the 2014 season we started out slow. Lost 2 games in non district. Nobody expected wos to make it really deep in the playoffs. Then mid way through district they just lit fire. Blow out teams in the playoffs, that wos was the underdogs in. And made it to the sc game.... So it don't matter how you start. It's about improving each week to get better. And I think this team has that potential.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,933
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    jacobmartin
    Newest Member
    jacobmartin
    Joined



  • Posts

    • Yeah, I got that but talk about a stretch. It should seem obvious that Trump’s prosecution is purely political. If someone is going to do a whataboutism, at least make it similar.  This is so ludicrous that it’s like comparing a ham sandwich to a wallet.   
    • You consistently try to say Trump ran our debt up and that the stock market and job market cratered during his administration (along with other MSNBC talking points). That is a flat out LIE, and you know it. Not only are you telling a mistruth, you knowingly are telling a mistruth...which is a blatant LIE...which makes you a "(I don't remember what word you used to describe Trump, something like a purse for dirt)" does it not? You know for a fact that the economy, stock market, and job market was thriving under Trump. You know that the Democrats controlled the house, and proposed a budget that would hurt the economy, in which he shut down the government. Even after this fiasco brought on by Democrats, our economy flourished under his administration. Then Covid19 hit, and the blue states shut down the country. YOU KNOW THIS, but continue to blame Trump. You lie...blatantly. Again, what do we call these people that partake in disseminating misleading information. You coined it...that purse thing. Does the shoe fit? I bet it does. It is amazing that you try to put "MAGA people" into this little box for the soul purpose of allowing all negative attributes of anyone that will vote for Trump instead of Biden to be attributed. That is a sickening modus operandi of stupid people. It is hard for me to believe that you would adopt that childish stereotyping. But since you are willing, I'm willing to push back. I'm a Trump supporter. I will gladly vote for him over Biden. So get busy putting me in your silly little box of stereotypes so I can embarrass you some more. You've been shot down by practically everyone on this board when you say stuff like Trump is their Messiah, or that supporters overlook his flaws. Everyone on this board has stated that they don't agree with Trump on much of his behavior, but you ignore these statements and continue with your lies. Oh yeah, since I'm a Trump supporter, those comments were also directed directly at me. So let's go. Prove I'm a simpleton that will ignore all of Trump's flaws and vow to disown the bad ol' orangeman. Let's continue that diatribe you peddle. I now am interested in responding. I also have boxes I can place people in. Whose box is accurate? Better yet, whose box is more embarrassing? I'm fairly certain your box is more entertaining for the board to make fun of. TDS should be included in the DSM-6, or revise the DSM-5 to include it since this phenomenon is so pervasive now. You are a walking, talking picture of Trump Derangement Syndrome. Do you like that box? Can you refute the rationale for placing you in that box. Everyone can refute your rationale for placing them into your irrational box, while you languish in your TDS box.
    • Clinton got impeached because of it. David Pecker said it was true about Stormy today. Under oath.
    • Election interference. Cheating.
    • It’s not about worrying about Trump’s morality. It’s about him being held to a totally hypocritical standard that is applied to anybody else that’s not him. Double it if it happens to be a Democrat. What he did to Ted Cruz in 2016, for example. Accused him of extramarital affairs. Really? And the gang cheered the Master on. Sick is what it is.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...