Jump to content

Hull-Daisetta 16 Deweyville 22/FINAL 2 OT


H-D BOBCAT 55

Recommended Posts

HD's 1st team District selection DE/TE from last year #99, re-injured his groin in the 1st half, his Parents said he may be out the rest of season. Also, HD only really played 2 quarters vs D-Ville, HD Coaches made great half time adjustments. HD come alive in 2nd half. If HD would have spread D-Ville out in 1st half, HD wins this game. Gotta give the Pirates credit, they were ready to shutdown HD's offense in 1st half. The D-Ville passing attack was able to capitalize on HD's best secondary player #5 being out with concussion protocol. 

 

Bottom line, one heck of a game from both teams, HD is not as bad as folks thought. The Bobcats have a good scrappy defense, the QB is a play maker, #9 is an athlete that needs the ball more, #33 needs to slide in and take over for #99 on both sides of the ball, no brainer. HD will make the playoffs and could give Iola and Evadale all they want, in what lots of locals say is a down year for the Bobcats. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm proud of my Pirates. Hated that I had to miss the game, but graveyard shifts held me back. Sounded like a really good game. I hope the Hull-Daiesetta's players that got hurt have a speedy recovery and heal correctly. It was a fight to the finish, and I couldn't be more proud of my boys!

Edited by DHSPiratesBaseball
misspelling
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BruinGrad87 said:

so youre saying half their plays they threw the ball.....? because i dont believe that...

I believe it, new coach why not try something new? I mean we have a young QB who can put it in the air that's actually pretty good. Yeah it's hard to fathom it, because they barely threw it when I was in highschool and we had guys that could throw bombs. But this is a different coach, and maybe he sees something in our offense that's good enough to pass.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, DHSPiratesBaseball said:

I believe it, new coach why not try something new? I mean we have a young QB who can put it in the air that's actually pretty good. Yeah it's hard to fathom it, because they barely threw it when I was in highschool and we had guys that could throw bombs. But this is a different coach, and maybe he sees something in our offense that's good enough to pass.

Have they never thrown in the past or what?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, DHSPiratesBaseball said:

I believe it, new coach why not try something new? I mean we have a young QB who can put it in the air that's actually pretty good. Yeah it's hard to fathom it, because they barely threw it when I was in highschool and we had guys that could throw bombs. But this is a different coach, and maybe he sees something in our offense that's good enough to pass.

A new coach might... but not this new coach from what I have heard of the guy....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,933
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    jacobmartin
    Newest Member
    jacobmartin
    Joined


  • Posts

    • Yeah, I got that but talk about a stretch. It should seem obvious that Trump’s prosecution is purely political. If someone is going to do a whataboutism, at least make it similar.  This is so ludicrous that it’s like comparing a ham sandwich to a wallet.   
    • You consistently try to say Trump ran our debt up and that the stock market and job market cratered during his administration (along with other MSNBC talking points). That is a flat out LIE, and you know it. Not only are you telling a mistruth, you knowingly are telling a mistruth...which is a blatant LIE...which makes you a "(I don't remember what word you used to describe Trump, something like a purse for dirt)" does it not? You know for a fact that the economy, stock market, and job market was thriving under Trump. You know that the Democrats controlled the house, and proposed a budget that would hurt the economy, in which he shut down the government. Even after this fiasco brought on by Democrats, our economy flourished under his administration. Then Covid19 hit, and the blue states shut down the country. YOU KNOW THIS, but continue to blame Trump. You lie...blatantly. Again, what do we call these people that partake in disseminating misleading information. You coined it...that purse thing. Does the shoe fit? I bet it does. It is amazing that you try to put "MAGA people" into this little box for the soul purpose of allowing all negative attributes of anyone that will vote for Trump instead of Biden to be attributed. That is a sickening modus operandi of stupid people. It is hard for me to believe that you would adopt that childish stereotyping. But since you are willing, I'm willing to push back. I'm a Trump supporter. I will gladly vote for him over Biden. So get busy putting me in your silly little box of stereotypes so I can embarrass you some more. You've been shot down by practically everyone on this board when you say stuff like Trump is their Messiah, or that supporters overlook his flaws. Everyone on this board has stated that they don't agree with Trump on much of his behavior, but you ignore these statements and continue with your lies. Oh yeah, since I'm a Trump supporter, those comments were also directed directly at me. So let's go. Prove I'm a simpleton that will ignore all of Trump's flaws and vow to disown the bad ol' orangeman. Let's continue that diatribe you peddle. I now am interested in responding. I also have boxes I can place people in. Whose box is accurate? Better yet, whose box is more embarrassing? I'm fairly certain your box is more entertaining for the board to make fun of. TDS should be included in the DSM-6, or revise the DSM-5 to include it since this phenomenon is so pervasive now. You are a walking, talking picture of Trump Derangement Syndrome. Do you like that box? Can you refute the rationale for placing you in that box. Everyone can refute your rationale for placing them into your irrational box, while you languish in your TDS box.
    • Clinton got impeached because of it. David Pecker said it was true about Stormy today. Under oath.
    • Election interference. Cheating.
    • It’s not about worrying about Trump’s morality. It’s about him being held to a totally hypocritical standard that is applied to anybody else that’s not him. Double it if it happens to be a Democrat. What he did to Ted Cruz in 2016, for example. Accused him of extramarital affairs. Really? And the gang cheered the Master on. Sick is what it is.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...