Jump to content

Silsbee 30 Jasper 23/FINAL

WOSgrad

By WOSgrad
in High School Football

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 178
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

PINETREE
PINETREE

Great game Tigers...Don't know what was said after Jasper took the 2nd half possession and drove down for a TD but whatever it was turned your whole attitude around.....defense and offense became a di

STiger85
STiger85

Update on Paxton Bryan, the Silsbee receiver that took a helmet to helmet hit from Jasper player. He regained his sight 30-40 minutes after the helmet to helmet hit. He has a concussion that he has to

AggiesAreWe
AggiesAreWe

Kudos to Adonis for carrying the ball 28 times without being tackled for a loss.

Posted Images

WOSgrad

WOSgrad

Posted
  • Author
Posted
8 minutes ago, Tigers2010 said:

Is the athletic program on probation for what happened during basketball season? What happens if the UIL steps in and suspends him or something? Will all the Silsbee programs have "violated probation"?

No, it was just the boys basketball team that was put on probation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ST413

ST413

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, AggiesAreWe said:

Interesting

I will be interested in seeing how or if the UIl addresses is.  Like I said before this hit was unnecessary and in now way do I condone the hit.  However,  it is foorball aand it did happen during the play.  It wasn't a punch it was a football hit.  If it had happened after the play I would understand them stepping in.  But this warranted a penalty and maybe an ejection but not sure of any other punishment other than by the school.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
AggiesAreWe

AggiesAreWe

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, ST413 said:

I will be interested in seeing how or if the UIl addresses is.  Like I said before this hit was unnecessary and in now way do I condone the hit.  However,  it is foorball aand it did happen during the play.  It wasn't a punch it was a football hit.  If it had happened after the play I would understand them stepping in.  But this warranted a penalty and maybe an ejection but not sure of any other punishment other than by the school.

UIL will probably let schools handle this on their own.

I believe punishment will be doled out from Silsbee ISD

Link to comment
Share on other sites
AggiesAreWe

AggiesAreWe

Posted
Posted
5 hours ago, WOSgrad said:

It may be decided by entities other than Coach Smith:

This is the hidden content, please

A quote from the president of that officiating chapter:

The play didn't result in a penalty but John Ippolito, president of the Stephen F. Austin chapter of Texas Association of Sports Officials,  said a penalty for a late hit should have been called.

Ippolito said one of his crews was officiating the game and that he spoke with the referees regarding the incident after the game.

Ippolito said the referees told him they didn't see the hit, which is why no flag was thrown.

Ippolito added the officiating crew was only four members and not five because of a late cancellation, which altered the crew's ability to call the game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
bullets13

bullets13

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, ST413 said:

I will be interested in seeing how or if the UIl addresses is.  Like I said before this hit was unnecessary and in now way do I condone the hit.  However,  it is foorball aand it did happen during the play.  It wasn't a punch it was a football hit.  If it had happened after the play I would understand them stepping in.  But this warranted a penalty and maybe an ejection but not sure of any other punishment other than by the school.

I don't know if I'd call that a football hit.  Closer to aggravated assault.  I'm sure the jasper qb would've preferred to have been punched.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ST413

ST413

Posted
Posted
40 minutes ago, bullets13 said:

I don't know if I'd call that a football hit.  Closer to aggravated assault.  I'm sure the jasper qb would've preferred to have been punched.

Not defending the hit at all.  If you want to discuss the actual contact all I can tell is he lowered his shoulder and hit him high in the chest shoulder area or even head neck area it's too fast at that point forme to actually tell.  Now I have no doubt the qb would have at her been punched.  My statement was really that it was the same type of hit you see often in games with the exception of the situation( qb standing there) and time of the play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
bullets13

bullets13

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, ST413 said:

Not defending the hit at all.  If you want to discuss the actual contact all I can tell is he lowered his shoulder and hit him high in the chest shoulder area or even head neck area it's too fast at that point forme to actually tell.  Now I have no doubt the qb would have at her been punched.  My statement was really that it was the same type of hit you see often in games with the exception of the situation( qb standing there) and time of the play.

Fair enough 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Maroon4

Maroon4

Posted
Posted
9 hours ago, ST413 said:

Hmm who is that??

Paxton Bryan, went up for the catch and looked like he was hit head to head! We all gasped and wondered why no flag. He went down, and was taken off the field by stretcher in an ambulance to the hospital before the half. Blood was coming out of his ear, couldn't barely walk, couldn't see... But you don't hear anything about that hit? Wonder why? Paxton is a senior, also has a concussion, and will be out and not sure if he will return. 

This is the hidden content, please

Quote

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
STiger85

STiger85

Posted
Posted

Update on Paxton Bryan, the Silsbee receiver that took a helmet to helmet hit from Jasper player. He regained his sight 30-40 minutes after the helmet to helmet hit. He has a concussion that he has to go to the hospital for checkups, also a knot behind his ear that was caused by the helmet to helmet hit from the Jasper player. There was blood coming out of his ear but it was from a scratch from his helmet. He has been cleared to go to school at the end of the week just for half a day only. Hopefully Paxton can start full days at school next week. Paxton is improving each day and he is hopeful to rejoin his team in a few weeks or so. TigerNation!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Member Statistics

    45,900
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    henrysmith
    Newest Member
    henrysmith
    Joined


  • Posts

    • idk
      Liberty is Open

      By idk · Posted

      How do you know that Harrison is not a big opportunity? I don't really know him, but maybe just maybe he is what Liberty needs. I was just wondering what you know about Harrison that doesn't make him a big opportunity. 
    • Mr. Thornton Melon
      Liberty is Open

      By Mr. Thornton Melon · Posted

      This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up
    • 5GallonBucket
      Vivek interview with Rubin

      By 5GallonBucket · Posted

      The last 2 or so minutes are so true
    • tvc184
      US Supreme Court case from southeast Texas

      By tvc184 · Posted

      Looking back at the exact wording, it seems like you are correct and it was the concrete barriers that were the ultimate problem. I mentioned it in my last comment, even if it was just the barriers, did Texas take his property? I think a case like US v. Causby might go a long way to proving his case. Causby had an egg farm and during World War II, the US government started flying four engine heavy bombers for the war effort, low over his farm at full power. The extremely loud noise killed a bunch of his chickens and caused many of the rest of them to quit laying eggs. Even though he legally still on the property, he sued, saying that the federal government had effectively “taken” the use of his property from him. The US Supreme Court sided with him, saying that for the purposes of the Fifth Amendment, the federal government had indeed taken away the use of his property. It wasn’t intentional but that didn’t matter. It seems like this case would fall somewhere along those lines.
    • tvc184
      US Supreme Court case from southeast Texas

      By tvc184 · Posted

      That might have added to it but it said that they intentionally raised the roadway to help it act as a dam. Even if it was the dividers and no intent, did the state “take” his property without compensation? I think that it is interesting that a local landowner fought his case all the way to the US Supreme Court and won in a unanimous decision. So while he has not won his case yet, he won the right to have his day in court and possibly heard by a jury.     

  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...