Jump to content

Newton 41 Silsbee 17/FINAL


WOSgrad

Recommended Posts

I know one thing...  Tigers have so much to work on.  1st of all, the O-Line.  They got worn out in the middle.  2nd penalties.  Horrible execution.  You have to get better before district rolls around.  3rd, QB just can't take sack after sack after sack.  They, Newton, telegraphed EVERY time they were going to blitz.  There needs to be some plays ready.  4th, if you have of the fastest kids in the country on your team, you've got to get him more involved on offense.  From a coaching standpoint, there's no way you get shut out in a half by a team that MIGHT have 25 players on their team in total.  

Defense played well, despite being on the field the entire game, but they still missed several tackles, most of which were tackles for losses.  No way the Newton players break like 3 or 4 tackles when bottled up.  

Hopefully, since this first game is in the books, Silsbee has a gauge of where the level of play needs to be 15+ penalties won't cut it.  

And I just don't understand how the same RB ran for 1,800 yards as a sophmore gets bottled up all night.  Some things needs to be tweaked up to get this kid going for next week.

I look forward to drastic improvements next week.  back to the lab, Tigers.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, BMTSoulja1 said:

I know one thing...  Tigers have so much to work on.  1st of all, the O-Line.  They got worn out in the middle.  2nd penalties.  Horrible execution.  You have to get better before district rolls around.  3rd, QB just can't take sack after sack after sack.  They, Newton, telegraphed EVERY time they were going to blitz.  There needs to be some plays ready.  4th, if you have of the fastest kids in the country on your team, you've got to get him more involved on offense.  From a coaching standpoint, there's no way you get shut out in a half by a team that MIGHT have 25 players on their team in total.  

Defense played well, despite being on the field the entire game, but they still missed several tackles, most of which were tackles for losses.  No way the Newton players break like 3 or 4 tackles when bottled up.  

Hopefully, since this first game is in the books, Silsbee has a gauge of where the level of play needs to be 15+ penalties won't cut it.  

And I just don't understand how the same RB ran for 1,800 yards as a sophmore gets bottled up all night.  Some things needs to be tweaked up to get this kid going for next week.

I look forward to drastic improvements next week.  back to the lab, Tigers.  

Totally different scheme from sophomore year....... not enough 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, BMTSoulja1 said:

I know one thing...  Tigers have so much to work on.  1st of all, the O-Line.  They got worn out in the middle.  2nd penalties.  Horrible execution.  You have to get better before district rolls around.  3rd, QB just can't take sack after sack after sack.  They, Newton, telegraphed EVERY time they were going to blitz.  There needs to be some plays ready.  4th, if you have of the fastest kids in the country on your team, you've got to get him more involved on offense.  From a coaching standpoint, there's no way you get shut out in a half by a team that MIGHT have 25 players on their team in total.  

Defense played well, despite being on the field the entire game, but they still missed several tackles, most of which were tackles for losses.  No way the Newton players break like 3 or 4 tackles when bottled up.  

Hopefully, since this first game is in the books, Silsbee has a gauge of where the level of play needs to be 15+ penalties won't cut it.  

And I just don't understand how the same RB ran for 1,800 yards as a sophmore gets bottled up all night.  Some things needs to be tweaked up to get this kid going for next week.

I look forward to drastic improvements next week.  back to the lab, Tigers.  

We have 37 players :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We definitely have a lot to work on no doubt there.  This game wasn't really as close as the score in my eyes.  Our offense had one big play score, and then maybe gains 10 yds for the field goal.  One big punt return and that's it.  Offensive line needs to improve, it's only game one.  Same can be said for the qb role.  Have to get more time but also when you have a little time need to get rid of it a little quicker.  We definitely need to get the ball in both those speedy receivers hands, but those routes are took too long to come open. Not really worried about the running game at this point.  One difference Adonis is facing is that he doesn't have that big threat of a running qb back there helping open that middle up for him.  One thing about tonight's game,  you are not going to run the ball outside on Newton.

As far as the defensive side of the ball,  well it needs some work too.  I saw some things I liked, at times,  good hitting, some good tackling,  some good coverage and some just outright good plays. However I also saw backs not get covered coming out of the backfield,  Newton getting outside on us too much,  and giving up too many yards on cutbacks. But like I said about the offense, it's early.  We have only had one scrimmage before tonight.

As far as special teams we had kind of a mixed bag.  Some good punts and a few poor ones.  Some god coverage on some of those punts.  Good job on punt returns, didn't really get much of a kick return.  And the bright spot, we have a kicker!!!!  First game of the year we go 2-2 on extra points and get a 45 yd FIELD GOAL!!!

It's only the first game against a always solid Newton team.  Let's just sit back and see how these young men do.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The difference in this game was Newton was the better team. We always have fewer boys suited up this is nothing new.  It's how Coach Johnstnson prepares them and the culture they grow up in.   We had a lot more kids going both ways than Silsbee did but check out the stats. Take of that 70 yd to pass (which was beautiful) and Newton'D did a great job.  We only have around 300 kids in school.  How about a little credit for consistently beating schools 2 1/2 times bigger. I don't see anyone else doing that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Old school eagle said:

The difference in this game was Newton was the better team. We always have fewer boys suited up this is nothing new.  It's how Coach Johnstnson prepares them and the culture they grow up in.   We had a lot more kids going both ways than Silsbee did but check out the stats. Take of that 70 yd to pass (which was beautiful) and Newton'D did a great job.  We only have around 300 kids in school.  How about a little credit for consistently beating schools 2 1/2 times bigger. I don't see anyone else doing that.

and Newton was better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Listening to the game and a watching a few games last yeaf, this offense scheme is still questionable. Adonis, did well his sophomore because he is a solid back but had a very mobile QB who rushed for 1800 yards and 20 something touchdowns. Silsbee QB this year isn't as noble and the scheme is much different. Tyler was a dynamic back who made the offense last year with Jones and Barnes. The Silsbee OL really needs to dig in and get better or this team is going nowhere. I hope this was just bad play due to being 1st game and a week or so no practice. Defense is much improved but can't be on the field all night. Not sure why on 3 different possessions we threw the ball od 2nd and short. Silsbee needs to keep the ball in Barnes and Lowe's hands 50% of the time. Alot of games left. I see us as a 3rd lr 4th seed or staying home. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,924
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    TRUTHTELLER409
    Newest Member
    TRUTHTELLER409
    Joined



  • Posts

    • That there’s not a single thread on the fact that the Republican nominee is on trial for paying off a porn star with whom he had an affair while the future First Lady was carrying said nominee’s child.    I remember back when the dirty, no-good Dems sacked Gary Hart over something similar. Same thing with John Edwards and later Anthony Weiner.    But y’all keep pretending God is on your side, lol. 
    • I hear what you’re saying, BUT… that hammers the hell out of poor people and the ones with multiple properties don’t eat any more than the poor ones. In fact, you’d basically just be taxing a lot of peoples’ EBT payments. The government  can’t get ahead by taxing what they’re already borrowing to give to people.    I think well off people should pay more… but the scale as it exists is broken.    For the sake of argument, my mom’s house in Groves is valued at $125k. 2/1/1 on a slab.  Her tax bill is $850/year. Without exemptions, her bill would be 3200. It’s right on JCAD’s website. The problem is this…. If someone tries to rent out an identical house, they’d expect to get, what… $1200/month? If you take into account that homeowners/windstorm/flood is a minimum of another $2k per year, you’d need $5k a year just to cover the taxes and insurance. That’s four months (1/3 of the year) just to cover those costs, not counting a potential mortgage payment. But then everybody cries about how expensive rents are… you can’t tax the hell out of non-homestead property to make up for gifts given to homeowners in the form of big tax cuts. It just doesn’t work.    Ten acres in Lumberton? I’ve got a buddy with 10 acres in Lumberton on HWY 69. Prime property… it’s his retirement plan. Sale it one day and cash in. The CAD decided that it no longer qualifies for a special use valuation (timber) and stripped his “exemption.” His 2023 tax bill jumped from $25 to $22,000…. It’s insane.  
    • I’m curious what happened… they aren’t even in full pads yet. 
    • They’re going to have win almost all remaining games and get finals of tournament to think about an at-large. When LU was in the WAC, Grand Canyon got an at-large after New Mexico St came out of nowhere to win conference tournament. Grand Canyon had a dang good resume that year. It can happen, but resume wise isn’t in their favor.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...