Jump to content

Hardin at Huntington


camsdad

Recommended Posts

38 minutes ago, oldschool2 said:

My final 2 cents on the subject:

Hardin definitely would've beaten HD.  I'll be the first to admit that I underestimated HD last year and was pleasantly surprised by their success...But they lost too much and even if Hardin stayed the same as far as ability last year was a pretty close game.  Doesn't matter because we'll never know.  If Hodges is smart he'll get that game off the schedule for the next 2 years and he won't have to worry about it.

Back to this Huntington matchup.  Neither are very good I think...I think Huntington may be worse.  We'll find out.

And yes nobody is bashing Haynes.  The man is a good coach there's no doubt.  But yes he was viewed as the "savior" to the program when he came in.  Even good coaches can't win a race horce with a donkey.  And yeah the way he acquired the position may not have sat well with some.  Like me.  But it is what it is.  Just glad football is back around and I'm sure the kids are happy for some normalcy after the storm.

"Miracle worker, supernatural powers, shrine dedicated to him". I consider these jabs. I didn't say bashing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, camsdad said:

"Miracle worker, supernatural powers, shrine dedicated to him". I consider these jabs. I didn't say bashing. 

Those are just a few of the things he has been called around here. There are a select few who really believe he is going to take Hardin back to the playoffs this year. Larry Haynes is literally "worshiped"  by some people in Hardin.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, PlayActionPass said:

Those are just a few of the things he has been called around here. There are a select few who really believe he is going to take Hardin back to the playoffs this year. Larry Haynes is literally "worshiped"  by some people in Hardin.

That's really sad if that's the case. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, oldschool2 said:

My final 2 cents on the subject:

Hardin definitely would've beaten HD.  I'll be the first to admit that I underestimated HD last year and was pleasantly surprised by their success...But they lost too much and even if Hardin stayed the same as far as ability last year was a pretty close game.  Doesn't matter because we'll never know.  If Hodges is smart he'll get that game off the schedule for the next 2 years and he won't have to worry about it.

Back to this Huntington matchup.  Neither are very good I think...I think Huntington may be worse.  We'll find out.

And yes nobody is bashing Haynes.  The man is a good coach there's no doubt.  But yes he was viewed as the "savior" to the program when he came in.  Even good coaches can't win a race horce with a donkey.  And yeah the way he acquired the position may not have sat well with some.  Like me.  But it is what it is.  Just glad football is back around and I'm sure the kids are happy for some normalcy after the storm.

Wow lol. So your a  psychic now, you know for sure Hardin would have beat HD?! Huh no! Hardin said that last year, last time I checked 30-18 is not real close, I believe Hardin scored as time expired to get that 18 lol. Furthermore, two things you should know, 1st off, no HD Coach has ever took Hardin off a schedule because of avoiding them, secondly, no HD Coach has ever worried about the Hardin Hornets in regards to football, tennis or baseball maybe, not football. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, H-D BOBCAT 55 said:

Wow lol. So your a  psychic now, you know for sure Hardin would have beat HD?! Huh no! Hardin said that last year, last time I checked 30-18 is not real close, I believe Hardin scored as time expired to get that 18 lol. Furthermore, two things you should know, 1st off, no HD Coach has ever took Hardin off a schedule because of avoiding them, secondly, no HD Coach has ever worried about the Hardin Hornets in regards to football, tennis or baseball maybe, not football. 

That's because they're terrified of all the

Horsemen over their. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, H-D BOBCAT 55 said:

Wow lol. So your a  psychic now, you know for sure Hardin would have beat HD?! Huh no! Hardin said that last year, last time I checked 30-18 is not real close, I believe Hardin scored as time expired to get that 18 lol. Furthermore, two things you should know, 1st off, no HD Coach has ever took Hardin off a schedule because of avoiding them, secondly, no HD Coach has ever worried about the Hardin Hornets in regards to football, tennis or baseball maybe, not football. 

Well well well.  I knew you couldn't avoid replying to me for forever.

I'm surprised you picked a post that I gave HD compliments to do it though.  Anyway...

If you must know...then yeah.  Maybe I am a psychic.  For instance, after HD's relatively good season last year I knew you'd come roaring back with the HD55 comments we all remember.  So there you go. I can see the future.  By the way...at least ONE HD coach took Hardin off the schedule.  Y'all didn't play them the 2 years before last...so.  Here's another prediction for you.  You'll never mention the Hardin/HD record in the last 10, 20, or 30 years.  Lol.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, oldschool2 said:

Well well well.  I knew you couldn't avoid replying to me for forever.

I'm surprised you picked a post that I gave HD compliments to do it though.  Anyway...

If you must know...then yeah.  Maybe I am a psychic.  For instance, after HD's relatively good season last year I knew you'd come roaring back with the HD55 comments we all remember.  So there you go. I can see the future.  By the way...at least ONE HD coach took Hardin off the schedule.  Y'all didn't play them the 2 years before last...so.  Here's another prediction for you.  You'll never mention the Hardin/HD record in the last 10, 20, or 30 years.  Lol.  

What is the record over that past 30 years?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, WOSgrad said:

From 1988-present, H-D leads the series 13-5.

From 1988-97: HD 7, Hardin 0

From 1998-2007: HD 3, Hardin 3

From 2008-present: HD 3, Hardin 2

Yeah I was implying that the series gets less and less one sided the more recent you get.  And the matchup is happening less and less.  Don't get me wrong...that should be the case.  HD continues dropping in enrollment so they should lose to a school with twice as many kids.  But..Hardin is still one of worst teams in the land in their classification.  Either way...I stand firm that Hardin probably would've gotten this year.  I guess we'll never know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,933
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    jacobmartin
    Newest Member
    jacobmartin
    Joined



  • Posts

    • Yeah, I got that but talk about a stretch. It should seem obvious that Trump’s prosecution is purely political. If someone is going to do a whataboutism, at least make it similar.  This is so ludicrous that it’s like comparing a ham sandwich to a wallet.   
    • You consistently try to say Trump ran our debt up and that the stock market and job market cratered during his administration (along with other MSNBC talking points). That is a flat out LIE, and you know it. Not only are you telling a mistruth, you knowingly are telling a mistruth...which is a blatant LIE...which makes you a "(I don't remember what word you used to describe Trump, something like a purse for dirt)" does it not? You know for a fact that the economy, stock market, and job market was thriving under Trump. You know that the Democrats controlled the house, and proposed a budget that would hurt the economy, in which he shut down the government. Even after this fiasco brought on by Democrats, our economy flourished under his administration. Then Covid19 hit, and the blue states shut down the country. YOU KNOW THIS, but continue to blame Trump. You lie...blatantly. Again, what do we call these people that partake in disseminating misleading information. You coined it...that purse thing. Does the shoe fit? I bet it does. It is amazing that you try to put "MAGA people" into this little box for the soul purpose of allowing all negative attributes of anyone that will vote for Trump instead of Biden to be attributed. That is a sickening modus operandi of stupid people. It is hard for me to believe that you would adopt that childish stereotyping. But since you are willing, I'm willing to push back. I'm a Trump supporter. I will gladly vote for him over Biden. So get busy putting me in your silly little box of stereotypes so I can embarrass you some more. You've been shot down by practically everyone on this board when you say stuff like Trump is their Messiah, or that supporters overlook his flaws. Everyone on this board has stated that they don't agree with Trump on much of his behavior, but you ignore these statements and continue with your lies. Oh yeah, since I'm a Trump supporter, those comments were also directed directly at me. So let's go. Prove I'm a simpleton that will ignore all of Trump's flaws and vow to disown the bad ol' orangeman. Let's continue that diatribe you peddle. I now am interested in responding. I also have boxes I can place people in. Whose box is accurate? Better yet, whose box is more embarrassing? I'm fairly certain your box is more entertaining for the board to make fun of. TDS should be included in the DSM-6, or revise the DSM-5 to include it since this phenomenon is so pervasive now. You are a walking, talking picture of Trump Derangement Syndrome. Do you like that box? Can you refute the rationale for placing you in that box. Everyone can refute your rationale for placing them into your irrational box, while you languish in your TDS box.
    • Clinton got impeached because of it. David Pecker said it was true about Stormy today. Under oath.
    • Election interference. Cheating.
    • It’s not about worrying about Trump’s morality. It’s about him being held to a totally hypocritical standard that is applied to anybody else that’s not him. Double it if it happens to be a Democrat. What he did to Ted Cruz in 2016, for example. Accused him of extramarital affairs. Really? And the gang cheered the Master on. Sick is what it is.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...