Jump to content

Trump admits Russia interfered

Big girl

By Big girl
in Political Forum

 Share

Recommended Posts

baddog

baddog

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, Big girl said:

Let me redirect the conversation. Trump admits that Russia interfered. Last week he said the they didn't. He said it was something the Democrats were making up.

Why did he lie and why is he admitting the truth now?

Could it be due to this?

Obama should have done more to counter Russia's election meddling, top Dem says

This is the hidden content, please

Link to comment
Share on other sites
baddog

baddog

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, Big girl said:

So, you are admitting that Russia interfered? Are you saying that Trump shouldnt be the President, because he didnt win the election "fair and square"?

Not at all. Don't put words in my mouth. Read the article. Your boy Obama knew about Russia and did NOTHING, but you say nothing about that. I wonder why? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
baddog

baddog

Posted
Posted

Isn't it strange how the Obama administration did nothing about Russian interference because they were afraid it might appear that the election was rigged AGAINST Trump, but when Trump wins the election, all the dems claim Russia rigged it in Trump's favor? Nothing to see here!

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
BS Wildcats

BS Wildcats

Posted
Posted
57 minutes ago, Big girl said:

So, you are admitting that Russia interfered. Are you saying that Trump shouldnt be the President, because he didnt win the election "fair and square"?

Trump did win the election fair and square.  Like baddog said, Russian interference started during Obama's administration and he did nothing, so why are you not condemning Obama.  To answer baddog's question, I think we all know why

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Hagar

Hagar

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Englebert said:

Does anybody have a link or can detail what Russia actually did to be classified as "meddling" in our elections? I have yet to see any information on the actual actions performed by Russia. (Granted, I haven't looked very hard.)

Jmo, the "alleged meddling" by Russia is based on the Russians supposedly accessing voter registration list.  Not what I'd consider "meddling in the election", but the TDS has them literally, out of their minds.  Imo, whoever hacked into those list was to get personal info for financial gain, not the actual vote.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PhatMack19

PhatMack19

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, Big girl said:

Let me redirect the conversation. Trump admits that Russia interfered. Last week he said the they didn't. He said it was something the Democrats were making up.

Why did he lie and why is he admitting the truth now?

There is a difference between Russia meddling in the election and Trump-Russia collusion.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Fee Dee

Fee Dee

Posted
Posted
On 6/25/2017 at 6:26 PM, Englebert said:

Nothing failed. It was Obama's fault for inaction. The Russians had already hacked into every branch of our military while he was playing dictator...and he did nothing. Would you care to expound or debate on your childish hypothesis? Your equivalency attempt is pathetic and an epic fail, especially after hearing for eight years about how everything was Bush's fault.

Now you know better than t Obama told the Russians that we also had capabilities and would use them if they didn't back off. he also offered help to the state's election boards and our government put in countermeasures, What else should he have done, a full out cyber war, or maybe just nuke them. He put in sanctions that Trump team were it appears were trying to signal the Russian wouldn't be upheld under the new administration. It's obvious that you only read and hear what you agree with. Open up that mind and look at the whole picture.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Englebert

Englebert

Posted
Posted
11 minutes ago, Fee Dee said:

Now you know better than t Obama told the Russians that we also had capabilities and would use them if they didn't back off. he also offered help to the state's election boards and our government put in countermeasures, What else should he have done, a full out cyber war, or maybe just nuke them. He put in sanctions that Trump team were it appears were trying to signal the Russian wouldn't be upheld under the new administration. It's obvious that you only read and hear what you agree with. Open up that mind and look at the whole picture.

Have you really gone so senile as to cut and paste your own ridiculous post?

He did nothing when the Russians hacked every branch of our military. Read a book. You look like a fool taking up for the worst president in American history, then denigrating the current president while refusing to give any supporting evidence. (And I don't even like Trump, but he sure knows how the bring out the Liberal true colors.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Fee Dee

Fee Dee

Posted
Posted

Hell maybe I have gone Bananas, I have trouble with this site, so okay I pasted my own comments, Hey I understand Trump is in a bad light as far as us liberals, but what I fail to understand is why conservatives back him when he is wrong. I don't expect you all to throw him under the bus, but admit it when he makes a mistake, and don't  try to whitewash it with alternate facts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Englebert

Englebert

Posted
Posted
9 hours ago, Fee Dee said:

Hell maybe I have gone Bananas, I have trouble with this site, so okay I pasted my own comments, Hey I understand Trump is in a bad light as far as us liberals, but what I fail to understand is why conservatives back him when he is wrong. I don't expect you all to throw him under the bus, but admit it when he makes a mistake, and don't  try to whitewash it with alternate facts.

So when people call Trump an orange, paranoid, unbalanced, racist, homophobic, idiotic, mentally disturbed, incompetent, misogynist, deplorable, liar, stooge, Putin love child, xenophobic, adulterer, etc., and someone asks for proof of these claims, you take that to mean we are defending him? And who has defended him when he has been wrong? Please give an example of this (even though history has shown you won't defend your comments).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Member Statistics

    45,886
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    cihnen
    Newest Member
    cihnen
    Joined


  • Posts

    • Coach_Izzy
      Boutte Retires - West Brook Hires Mike Thomas

      By Coach_Izzy · Posted

      Really good hire! As I stated previously on this thread, Mike T has been an essential part of WB’s success the last few years & is a student of the game & I have a ton of respect for how he goes about things as a coach. Big on teaching kids how to do things the right way to prepare them for not only basketball but the game of life. He’ll be fine there, my only question is what kind of talent does WB have returning?  Best thing about this situation for Mike T is WB will be 5A for at least the next 2 years, so he should win a lot of games & have some deep playoff runs.
    • pine curtain
      Will Anahuac lose a district game ?

      By pine curtain · Posted

      So which coaches kid gets the QB job? Trotter or Barrier
    • tvc184
      US Supreme Court case from southeast Texas

      By tvc184 · Posted

      A Winnie land owner (and others) sued the State of Texas after they built IH-10 a few feet higher in order to help contain storm flooding. Sure enough a hurricane hit and flooded the land. The storm improvements worked!! Unfortunately the state sacrificed several people’s properties in using the interstate highway as a dam.  Richard DeVillier tried to sue Texas under our laws and Constitution and the US Constitution under the Fifth Amendment “taking clause” (eminent domain). After a favorable ruling in the federal district court on the right to sue Texas directly, the Fifth Circuit Court in New Orleans overturned that ruling and said that the DeVlier had no authority to sue Texas directly.  On Tuesday a unanimous US Supreme Court ruled that DeVillier and others had the right to sue Texas directly under Texas law and under the Fifth Amendment of the US Constitution. The case is now sent back down to the lower court. DeVillier and others have not won their lawsuits as the case has not been decided on its merits at a trial. He still has to go to prove his case. What they did win was a unanimous Supreme Court agreeing that he has the right to bring Texas to trial for taking his property with just compensation.   
    • Reagan
      Political Memes

      By Reagan · Posted

      Don't jump?!  What?!
    • Reagan
      Trump Running in 2024

      By Reagan · Posted

      @Big girl  @UT alum     Amazing, isn't it?!  

  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...