Jump to content

Can I LOL this?


westend1

Recommended Posts

Politics

Trump Says He Doesn't Want Poor People In Charge Of The Economy

710c91c0-4b9c-11e7-8912-374be9390b1b_H-1 Nick Visser,HuffPost 11 hours ago 
President Donald Trump spoke to a crowd of thousands in Cedar Rapids, Iowa, on Wednesday. (Jonathan Ernst / Reuters)

President 

This is the hidden content, please
, addressing criticism that 
This is the hidden content, please
 and others in his Cabinet are too rich, said at an Iowa rally Wednesday that he doesn’t want poor people in charge of the economy.

“These are people that are great, brilliant business minds, and that’s what we need, that’s what we have to have so the world doesn’t take advantages of us,” Trump, told 

This is the hidden content, please
 in Cedar Rapids. “We can’t have the world taking advantage of us anymore. And I love all people, rich or poor, but in those particular positions I just don’t want a poor person. Does that make sense? Does that make sense?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, stevenash said:

But some people will take/interpret his statement and then say  Trump said he hates poor people.  And the bots sheep will regurgitate at breakneck speed.

Yep, that's the interpretation I'm predicting also. I bet we hear "Trump hates poor people" for at least 4 more years (hopefully 8 years). I would also bet this line will splinter to "Republicans hate poor people". Of course, that's already a prevalent theme from Liberals.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let's see, many on the left don't think Trump should be the president because he has no experience in running any government program. He has no clue what he is doing. He should leave it to the career politicians that know how things work. 

Okay, so Trump wants people that know how to spur growth in charge of the economy... but now the left is saying, hey, experience is not needed. Middle class Americans need to be in charge of what is good economically. 

I don't know if Trump is correct but I understand his concept. I don't want a college dropout that is organizing anti-military peace rallies to be in charge of the Department of Defense. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, tvc184 said:

Let's see, many on the left don't think Trump should be the president because he has no experience in running any government program. He has no clue what he is doing. He should leave it to the career politicians that know how things work. 

Okay, so Trump wants people that know how to spur growth in charge of the economy... but now the left is saying, hey, experience is not needed. Middle class Americans need to be in charge of what is good economically. 

I don't know if Trump is correct but I understand his concept. I don't want a college dropout that is organizing anti-military peace rallies to be in charge of the Department of Defense. 

But do they all have to be super rich?   He hires donors.  Drain the swamp my rear.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whats wrong with this line of thinking?  By the time  one is in the autumn of his life and has become very accomplished at his or her particular endeavor, there is a very good chance that doing well in that particular field of endeavor has allowed one to accumulate a meaningful sum of material wealth.  In contrast, those who have done an average job or slightly above or below average were unable to accumulate as much.  Should we hire those who have done exceptionally well or should we hire the near average person so doing so can seem more politically correct?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, stevenash said:

Whats wrong with this line of thinking?  By the time  one is in the autumn of his life and has become very accomplished at his or her particular endeavor, there is a very good chance that doing well in that particular field of endeavor has allowed one to accumulate a meaningful sum of material wealth.  In contrast, those who have done an average job or slightly above or below average were unable to accumulate as much.  Should we hire those who have done exceptionally well or should we hire the near average person so doing so can seem more politically correct?

If we go for below average, and someone who didn't donate to Trump, I'm your man.  What's it pay?

And I don't wanna here no "dollar a year" bovine feces.  High 6 figures or low seven.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, stevenash said:

Whats wrong with this line of thinking?  By the time  one is in the autumn of his life and has become very accomplished at his or her particular endeavor, there is a very good chance that doing well in that particular field of endeavor has allowed one to accumulate a meaningful sum of material wealth.  In contrast, those who have done an average job or slightly above or below average were unable to accumulate as much.  Should we hire those who have done exceptionally well or should we hire the near average person so doing so can seem more politically correct?

There you go, holding the little man down again by requiring he be qualified.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,304
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    Kourt1
    Newest Member
    Kourt1
    Joined
×
×
  • Create New...