Jump to content

Winning state titles comes with the price of scheduling conflicts

WOSgrad

By WOSgrad
in High School Football

 Share

Recommended Posts

WOSgrad

WOSgrad

Posted
  • Author
Posted
29 minutes ago, EnjoyLife said:

I would like to have that problem.

Oh, I don't think you'll see Coach Thompson petitioning the UIL to take back their trophies.

However, it does cause quite a headache.  It is a big enough problem that he has to get 6 non-district games to fill a 10 game schedule.  You couple that with a quite lengthy list of schools that decline to play and the headache becomes one that Excedrin can't get rid of.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
WOSgrad

WOSgrad

Posted
  • Author
Posted
27 minutes ago, 2wedge said:

WOS should never have to leave the triangle to fill that schedule. Between PNG, Central, Westbrook, Nederland, Lumberton, Vidor, Jasper, and PAM, someone should be willing to play WOS yearly. If I was PNG, this game would always be on my schedule. Why is everyone so afraid of the competition?

Well, to be fair.  All of the above teams have fewer non-district games than the Mustangs.  If the new alignment somehow creates smaller 5A districts (which it may or may not do) that might create some more opportunities.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CCRed

CCRed

Posted
Posted

Like grad said, the biggest problem is having to play 6 non-district games.  Most schools only play 2-3 and at most 4.  That leaves them looking for other schools that only have 4 or 5 teams in their district to schedule with.  I think all districts should have at least 8 teams, especially if you're going to take 4 to the playoffs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
griff

griff

Posted
Posted

In the last few years, I have made this exact point on this message board about more than a few teams being unwilling (downright DECLINING) to play WO-S, while they had the opportunity to agree to play. Several posters did not believe me, but now we see the information has gone public. Coach T has never been one to toot his own horn or try to get public attention for himself. But since the Bmt Enterprise decided to do this article, now everyone knows what at least a few of us have known for years. This same problem has existed for WO-S since the Dan Hooks years, but the difficulty to schedule teams has never been higher than it is now. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Uncle Pig

Uncle Pig

Posted
Posted
11 hours ago, 2wedge said:

WOS should never have to leave the triangle to fill that schedule. Between PNG, Central, Westbrook, Nederland, Lumberton, Vidor, Jasper, and PAM, someone should be willing to play WOS yearly. If I was PNG, this game would always be on my schedule. Why is everyone so afraid of the competition?

Would love to see WOS vs. PAM

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest ECBucFan

Guest ECBucFan

Posted
Posted

I noticed Thompson stated "Bridge City wound up with with a 21-day gap between a non-district loss to Newton and its district opener against Cleveland." So, how did BC do against Cleveland in the district opener? Why did the writer mention a non district loss if a more important district result is left omitted? BTW, BC 42, Cleveland 3.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites
purpleeagle

purpleeagle

Posted
Posted

Some districts are probably smaller due to trying to cut down on long traveling games. I know they added Frankston to Newton's district. Frankston is the other side of Jacksonville. A lot of our fans cannot travel that far. That's a long drive on the old yellow dog. A major problem if our football bus breaks down and we have to get another bus brought down to make it to the game on time. Last year our cheer leader bus broke down, luckily we were only playing at Silsbee that night.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Hagar

Hagar

Posted
Posted

Kudos to KIPP, whoever they are.  WOS won't get a lot out of it, but at least they can suit up and get on the field with someone.  As a poster alluded to earlier, I bet any team would love to have this kind of problem.  Says volumes about the WOS program.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
WOSgrad

WOSgrad

Posted
  • Author
Posted
3 hours ago, ECBucFan said:

I noticed Thompson stated "Bridge City wound up with with a 21-day gap between a non-district loss to Newton and its district opener against Cleveland." So, how did BC do against Cleveland in the district opener? Why did the writer mention a non district loss if a more important district result is left omitted? BTW, BC 42, Cleveland 3.   

I agree, it adds nothing to the article by referencing a loss before the gap.  He even cuts himself off when he has DuBois admitting that it ended up not being a bad thing for them.

That being said, I am sure that he is glad that he doesn't have a repeat of that again this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
png9mon

png9mon

Posted
Posted
19 hours ago, 2wedge said:

WOS should never have to leave the triangle to fill that schedule. Between PNG, Central, Westbrook, Nederland, Lumberton, Vidor, Jasper, and PAM, someone should be willing to play WOS yearly. If I was PNG, this game would always be on my schedule. Why is everyone so afraid of the competition?

PNG scrimmages WOS, but I would love to see that game in the pre-season every year. Great teams & atmosphere.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
WOSgrad

WOSgrad

Posted
  • Author
Posted
18 hours ago, EaglesFootball said:

I'm pretty sure I heard one of the Newton coaches say that they are playing WOS in 2018 and 2019 seasons which is awesome in my opinion. 

That would be great, Newton usually provides a decent test for WO-S.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ctown81

ctown81

Posted
Posted
22 hours ago, EnjoyLife said:

I would like to have that problem.

I don't think it's a problem I'd like to have. From what the posters are saying here is WOS will not be as good as next year, but they still have a shot. If that's the case, this team may need to be battle tested before they get to the playoffs. If not, I give the advantage to Gilmer this year if they meet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Uncle Pig

Uncle Pig

Posted
Posted
5 hours ago, WOSgrad said:

I would, too.  But apparently, one of the coaches who would have to agree to this game is one of those on the "list of 30" referenced in the article.

Yessir nothing to gain and everything to lose for PAM; if they beat them, big deal they're supposed to. If WOS beats PAM(which IMO could very easily happen) then it looks real bad for PAM.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bigdog

Bigdog

Posted
Posted
23 hours ago, 2wedge said:

WOS should never have to leave the triangle to fill that schedule. Between PNG, Central, Westbrook, Nederland, Lumberton, Vidor, Jasper, and PAM, someone should be willing to play WOS yearly. If I was PNG, this game would always be on my schedule. Why is everyone so afraid of the competition?

Nederland played them last year in non-district and will again this year.  I know PNG has had them on the schedule as well.   As far as 22-5a goes, losing a non-distict game because of the Livingston deal messed everyone up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Alpha Wolf

Alpha Wolf

Posted
Posted
On 6/21/2017 at 2:58 PM, 2wedge said:

WOS should never have to leave the triangle to fill that schedule. Between PNG, Central, Westbrook, Nederland, Lumberton, Vidor, Jasper, and PAM, someone should be willing to play WOS yearly. If I was PNG, this game would always be on my schedule. Why is everyone so afraid of the competition?

Well I'm pulling for Nelson and Thompson to put it on the schedule starting in 2018.  Central was playing them until Foreman and Thompson had a "conflict of interest"...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Member Statistics

    45,895
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    ronanhugo529
    Newest Member
    ronanhugo529
    Joined


  • Posts

    • Bigdog
      US Supreme Court case from southeast Texas

      By Bigdog · Posted

      Yeah I remember the pictures of the water piled up on the north side of the highway, it was bad.
    • baddog
      Political Memes

      By baddog · Posted

      That’s a president? How embarrassing. 
    • Coach_Izzy
      Boutte Retires - West Brook Hires Mike Thomas

      By Coach_Izzy · Posted

      Really good hire! As I stated previously on this thread, Mike T has been an essential part of WB’s success the last few years & is a student of the game & I have a ton of respect for how he goes about things as a coach. Big on teaching kids how to do things the right way to prepare them for not only basketball but the game of life. He’ll be fine there, my only question is what kind of talent does WB have returning?  Best thing about this situation for Mike T is WB will be 5A for at least the next 2 years, so he should win a lot of games & have some deep playoff runs.
    • pine curtain
      Will Anahuac lose a district game ?

      By pine curtain · Posted

      So which coaches kid gets the QB job? Trotter or Barrier
    • tvc184
      US Supreme Court case from southeast Texas

      By tvc184 · Posted

      A Winnie land owner (and others) sued the State of Texas after they built IH-10 a few feet higher in order to help contain storm flooding. Sure enough a hurricane hit and flooded the land. The storm improvements worked!! Unfortunately the state sacrificed several people’s properties in using the interstate highway as a dam.  Richard DeVillier tried to sue Texas under our laws and Constitution and the US Constitution under the Fifth Amendment “taking clause” (eminent domain). After a favorable ruling in the federal district court on the right to sue Texas directly, the Fifth Circuit Court in New Orleans overturned that ruling and said that the DeVlier had no authority to sue Texas directly.  On Tuesday a unanimous US Supreme Court ruled that DeVillier and others had the right to sue Texas directly under Texas law and under the Fifth Amendment of the US Constitution. The case is now sent back down to the lower court. DeVillier and others have not won their lawsuits as the case has not been decided on its merits at a trial. He still has to go to prove his case. What they did win was a unanimous Supreme Court agreeing that he has the right to bring Texas to trial for taking his property with just compensation.   

  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...