Jump to content

Predict Your Teams Record For 2017


BADSANTA

Recommended Posts

  • IMO my Bears O-line will be the biggest question mark on how we do. Crouch continues having 5-5 seasons ill go up to 6-4 depending how everything  goes this year. Depending on who we line up in the playoffs will test us. I don't believe we are ready for Carthage so being a 3rd or 4th place team is not good to get pass bi district.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, BADSANTA said:

I'll start it off with Silsbee going 7-3 in the regular season and going 3 rounds deep ending at 9-4 overall. 

Y'all are planning on losing to us, WOS, and who else?  

I predict 7-3, IF we get the quality of play from some kids who were big contributors that we need. We lost lots of kids to graduation. I think we'll start slow and build momentum as district play begins... kinda like the Tigers did last year.  

I see us handling HF and North Forest, I wouldn't bet against WOS, and we'll have real tests against Jasper and Newton. I think we'll hang on to beat the Bears (sorry LCM17), Cleveland, Navasota. I expect Huffman to regroup and be a DC challenger again this year, and I can freely admit that Silsbee has to be considered as a favorite for DC if you guys can replace some key pieces... but not as many pieces as we're trying to replace. It's definitely going to be a rebuilding year in BC for just about every starting position. Those BC kids had better be ready for one heckuva effort from the Tigers because I know y'all haven't forgotten last year.

That's my honest perception.  You can expect me to resume being an unrealistic homer as the season approaches. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, CardinalBacker said:

Y'all are planning on losing to us, WOS, and who else?  

I predict 7-3, IF we get the quality of play from some kids who were big contributors that we need. We lost lots of kids to graduation. I think we'll start slow and build momentum as district play begins... kinda like the Tigers did last year.  

I see us handling HF and North Forest, I wouldn't bet against WOS, and we'll have real tests against Jasper and Newton. I think we'll hang on to beat the Bears (sorry LCM17), Cleveland, Navasota. I expect Huffman to regroup and be a DC challenger again this year, and I can freely admit that Silsbee has to be considered as a favorite for DC if you guys can replace some key pieces... but not as many pieces as we're trying to replace. It's definitely going to be a rebuilding year in BC for just about every starting position. Those BC kids had better be ready for one heckuva effort from the Tigers because I know y'all haven't forgotten last year.

That's my honest perception.  You can expect me to resume being an unrealistic homer as the season approaches. 

25 minutes ago, CardinalBacker said:

Y'all are planning on losing to us, WOS, and who else?  

I predict 7-3, IF we get the quality of play from some kids who were big contributors that we need. We lost lots of kids to graduation. I think we'll start slow and build momentum as district play begins... kinda like the Tigers did last year.  

I see us handling HF and North Forest, I wouldn't bet against WOS, and we'll have real tests against Jasper and Newton. I think we'll hang on to beat the Bears (sorry LCM17), Cleveland, Navasota. I expect Huffman to regroup and be a DC challenger again this year, and I can freely admit that Silsbee has to be considered as a favorite for DC if you guys can replace some key pieces... but not as many pieces as we're trying to replace. It's definitely going to be a rebuilding year in BC for just about every starting position. Those BC kids had better be ready for one heckuva effort from the Tigers because I know y'all haven't forgotten last year.

That's my honest perception.  You can expect me to resume being an unrealistic homer as the season approaches. 

Anytime  we play Bridge City we should win the game. But ill say this your head has yall in the right direction. I believe St Pius will beat us, Jasper, WOS, Silsbee. With three transfers coming over in May before school let out we will see how they pan out. But who knows what will happen. Winters and Douglas should have a big year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Fightfaith said:

One and done in the playoffs. Those East Texas schools are to powerful for tiger town.

Silsbee ALMOST beat Carthage last year in the playoffs. I think Coach Smith has the program headed in the right direction. If they finish 1 or 2 in district I like their chances into round three. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, CardinalBacker said:

Silsbee ALMOST beat Carthage last year in the playoffs. I think Coach Smith has the program headed in the right direction. If they finish 1 or 2 in district I like their chances into round three. 

I believe Carthage won state correct? Almost doesn't count.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And actually i like Silsbee's chances to beat Carthage this year and here is why: coach smith has brought in an awesome defensive coordinator, which has been a weak spot for silsbee in the past. He made great strides on the defensive side last year and I'm sure silsbee faithful will see an even better defensive squad this year. 

On the other side of the ball, sometimes the best defensive plan is to keep their offense off the field, which I believe Adonis Thomas will do.. you won't see the explosive long td runs like you saw last year with Tyler, but what you will see is a very strong running back who can pick up 4-6 yards a carry, picking up first downs and keeping the chains and clock moving.

So a better defense, with a clock running offense might be the answer to beat a tough Carthage team who has put silsbee out of the playoffs so many times.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dayton Broncos- if healthy-8-2

                           Unhealthy-7-3

so fight faith you had the right number plugged in just in the wrong spots. I also feel this Bronco team will have a playoff run to get back to our tradition. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, L-Train11 said:

Your gonna be in trouble when Bronco94 sees this prediction.

Lol. Yeah. Lost 9 of our 11 starters on offense. Only returning a right tackle and our least athletic wide out. Like the wideout he is a great kid but at around 5"7 150 lbs with below average speed he just isn't going to make a lot happen after he catches the ball. Defense lost 7 starters  one of which was their best lb and has consistently been one of the worse defenses in our district for a while now. On a good note for Dayton 4 kids will be playing college ball next year and another one got a track scholarship to UH.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, bronco pride said:

Lol. Yeah. Lost 9 of our 11 starters on offense. Only returning a right tackle and our least athletic wide out. Like the wideout he is a great kid but at around 5"7 150 lbs with below average speed he just isn't going to make a lot happen after he catches the ball. Defense lost 7 starters  one of which was their best lb and has consistently been one of the worse defenses in our district for a while now. On a good note for Dayton 4 kids will be playing college ball next year and another one got a track scholarship to UH.

Did you see the jv talent that's coming up though?? :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,933
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    jacobmartin
    Newest Member
    jacobmartin
    Joined



  • Posts

    • Yeah, I got that but talk about a stretch. It should seem obvious that Trump’s prosecution is purely political. If someone is going to do a whataboutism, at least make it similar.  This is so ludicrous that it’s like comparing a ham sandwich to a wallet.   
    • You consistently try to say Trump ran our debt up and that the stock market and job market cratered during his administration (along with other MSNBC talking points). That is a flat out LIE, and you know it. Not only are you telling a mistruth, you knowingly are telling a mistruth...which is a blatant LIE...which makes you a "(I don't remember what word you used to describe Trump, something like a purse for dirt)" does it not? You know for a fact that the economy, stock market, and job market was thriving under Trump. You know that the Democrats controlled the house, and proposed a budget that would hurt the economy, in which he shut down the government. Even after this fiasco brought on by Democrats, our economy flourished under his administration. Then Covid19 hit, and the blue states shut down the country. YOU KNOW THIS, but continue to blame Trump. You lie...blatantly. Again, what do we call these people that partake in disseminating misleading information. You coined it...that purse thing. Does the shoe fit? I bet it does. It is amazing that you try to put "MAGA people" into this little box for the soul purpose of allowing all negative attributes of anyone that will vote for Trump instead of Biden to be attributed. That is a sickening modus operandi of stupid people. It is hard for me to believe that you would adopt that childish stereotyping. But since you are willing, I'm willing to push back. I'm a Trump supporter. I will gladly vote for him over Biden. So get busy putting me in your silly little box of stereotypes so I can embarrass you some more. You've been shot down by practically everyone on this board when you say stuff like Trump is their Messiah, or that supporters overlook his flaws. Everyone on this board has stated that they don't agree with Trump on much of his behavior, but you ignore these statements and continue with your lies. Oh yeah, since I'm a Trump supporter, those comments were also directed directly at me. So let's go. Prove I'm a simpleton that will ignore all of Trump's flaws and vow to disown the bad ol' orangeman. Let's continue that diatribe you peddle. I now am interested in responding. I also have boxes I can place people in. Whose box is accurate? Better yet, whose box is more embarrassing? I'm fairly certain your box is more entertaining for the board to make fun of. TDS should be included in the DSM-6, or revise the DSM-5 to include it since this phenomenon is so pervasive now. You are a walking, talking picture of Trump Derangement Syndrome. Do you like that box? Can you refute the rationale for placing you in that box. Everyone can refute your rationale for placing them into your irrational box, while you languish in your TDS box.
    • Clinton got impeached because of it. David Pecker said it was true about Stormy today. Under oath.
    • Election interference. Cheating.
    • It’s not about worrying about Trump’s morality. It’s about him being held to a totally hypocritical standard that is applied to anybody else that’s not him. Double it if it happens to be a Democrat. What he did to Ted Cruz in 2016, for example. Accused him of extramarital affairs. Really? And the gang cheered the Master on. Sick is what it is.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...