Jump to content

Evidence DNC Staffer Killed in DC had Contact With Wikileaks


Hagar

Recommended Posts

45 minutes ago, baddog said:

He was MURDERED one day before he was going to blow the whistle. That doesn't even stir up one iota of suspicion?

It was nothing but a murder to shut him up.  There was none of his personal belongings taken from his body, such as his wallet or a watch.  There was no reason to kill this man, other than to silence him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm making light of this only because of my fundamental way of thinking:

I personally believe our politicians do a lot of shady things.

For large cover ups of this magnitude. Requires alot of bipartisan agreement which I find hard to believe can happen in this day and age.

politicans will attack the other party at any given chance if this was halfway true Cruz and others will surely speak on it and persue it to the full.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, PAMFAM10 said:

I'm making light of this only because of my fundamental way of thinking:

I personally believe our politicians do a lot of shady things.

For large cover ups of this magnitude. Requires alot of bipartisan agreement which I find hard to believe can happen in this day and age.

politicans will attack the other party at any given chance if this was halfway true Cruz and others will surely speak on it and persue it to the full.

 

IF, this murder, and most of the other deaths associated with the Clintons, are actually part of a nefarious scheme, whoever is doing them are very good.  They never leave any evidence, plus there's enough power involved to curtail police involvement.  Not sure if you're aware of the long list (which started in Arkansas), but just to many to be a coincidence imo.  Plus, like a serial killer, a person that kills without any connection to the victim, is very difficult to ID, unless there's some evidence, such as prints or DNA.  

Im sure Cruz, and many others have their questions, but without some hardcore proof, no one will make any accusations.  For anyone in Congress to do so would be irresponsible, and political suicide.  I do it, half serious, and half jokingly.  It sounds absurd, but dadgum, there's sure been a bunch of folks die.  I don't actually think the Clintons are responsible, it's my belief they have someone, with a lot of money, and interest in them staying in power, that orders these things done.  But like everyone else, I have no proof.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, REBgp said:

IF, this murder, and most of the other deaths associated with the Clintons, are actually part of a nefarious scheme, whoever is doing them are very good.  They never leave any evidence, plus there's enough power involved to curtail police involvement.  Not sure if you're aware of the long list (which started in Arkansas), but just to many to be a coincidence imo.  Plus, like a serial killer, a person that kills without any connection to the victim, is very difficult to ID, unless there's some evidence, such as prints or DNA.  

Im sure Cruz, and many others have their questions, but without some hardcore proof, no one will make any accusations.  For anyone in Congress to do so would be irresponsible, and political suicide.  I do it, half serious, and half jokingly.  It sounds absurd, but dadgum, there's sure been a bunch of folks die.  I don't actually think the Clintons are responsible, it's my belief they have someone, with a lot of money, and interest in them staying in power, that orders these things done.  But like everyone else, I have no proof.

 

My favorite was the UN guy that dropped a dumbbell on his throat the day before he was due to testify against Hillary.  At least they are getting creative now.  The suicides with 2 shots to the back of the head was getting played out.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, PAMFAM10 said:

I'm making light of this only because of my fundamental way of thinking:

I personally believe our politicians do a lot of shady things.

For large cover ups of this magnitude. Requires alot of bipartisan agreement which I find hard to believe can happen in this day and age.

politicans will attack the other party at any given chance if this was halfway true Cruz and others will surely speak on it and persue it to the full.

 

I am okay with dems and rep going after each other but the problem is the media will only pursue one side of the story and demonize the other.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

after a couple of years of hearing the Iran deal and Mrs. Clinton’s homebrew server explained away, I’m just wondering when the media suddenly got so interested again in harmful White House dealings with hostile powers and the proper safeguarding of classified information.

Read more at:

This is the hidden content, please

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, jv_coach said:

after a couple of years of hearing the Iran deal and Mrs. Clinton’s homebrew server explained away, I’m just wondering when the media suddenly got so interested again in harmful White House dealings with hostile powers and the proper safeguarding of classified information.

Read more at:

This is the hidden content, please

Obviously the importance of national security is dependent on who's in charge.  Today, our media is as reliable as shooting a .22 pistol at a target 500 yards away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On May 17, 2017 at 10:21 PM, PhatMack19 said:

My favorite was the UN guy that dropped a dumbbell on his throat the day before he was due to testify against Hillary.  At least they are getting creative now.  The suicides with 2 shots to the back of the head was getting played out.  

I found this interesting article.  Starts off about Rich, then mentions some other dubious demises.  Warning, those on the left may be traumatized by reading this.

This is the hidden content, please

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 9 months later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,932
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    TRUTHTELLER409
    Newest Member
    TRUTHTELLER409
    Joined


  • Posts

    • Yeah, I got that but talk about a stretch. It should seem obvious that Trump’s prosecution is purely political. If someone is going to do a whataboutism, at least make it similar.  This is so ludicrous that it’s like comparing a ham sandwich to a wallet.   
    • You consistently try to say Trump ran our debt up and that the stock market and job market cratered during his administration (along with other MSNBC talking points). That is a flat out LIE, and you know it. Not only are you telling a mistruth, you knowingly are telling a mistruth...which is a blatant LIE...which makes you a "(I don't remember what word you used to describe Trump, something like a purse for dirt)" does it not? You know for a fact that the economy, stock market, and job market was thriving under Trump. You know that the Democrats controlled the house, and proposed a budget that would hurt the economy, in which he shut down the government. Even after this fiasco brought on by Democrats, our economy flourished under his administration. Then Covid19 hit, and the blue states shut down the country. YOU KNOW THIS, but continue to blame Trump. You lie...blatantly. Again, what do we call these people that partake in disseminating misleading information. You coined it...that purse thing. Does the shoe fit? I bet it does. It is amazing that you try to put "MAGA people" into this little box for the soul purpose of allowing all negative attributes of anyone that will vote for Trump instead of Biden to be attributed. That is a sickening modus operandi of stupid people. It is hard for me to believe that you would adopt that childish stereotyping. But since you are willing, I'm willing to push back. I'm a Trump supporter. I will gladly vote for him over Biden. So get busy putting me in your silly little box of stereotypes so I can embarrass you some more. You've been shot down by practically everyone on this board when you say stuff like Trump is their Messiah, or that supporters overlook his flaws. Everyone on this board has stated that they don't agree with Trump on much of his behavior, but you ignore these statements and continue with your lies. Oh yeah, since I'm a Trump supporter, those comments were also directed directly at me. So let's go. Prove I'm a simpleton that will ignore all of Trump's flaws and vow to disown the bad ol' orangeman. Let's continue that diatribe you peddle. I now am interested in responding. I also have boxes I can place people in. Whose box is accurate? Better yet, whose box is more embarrassing? I'm fairly certain your box is more entertaining for the board to make fun of. TDS should be included in the DSM-6, or revise the DSM-5 to include it since this phenomenon is so pervasive now. You are a walking, talking picture of Trump Derangement Syndrome. Do you like that box? Can you refute the rationale for placing you in that box. Everyone can refute your rationale for placing them into your irrational box, while you languish in your TDS box.
    • Clinton got impeached because of it. David Pecker said it was true about Stormy today. Under oath.
    • Election interference. Cheating.
    • It’s not about worrying about Trump’s morality. It’s about him being held to a totally hypocritical standard that is applied to anybody else that’s not him. Double it if it happens to be a Democrat. What he did to Ted Cruz in 2016, for example. Accused him of extramarital affairs. Really? And the gang cheered the Master on. Sick is what it is.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...