Jump to content

Silsbee vs North Forest Monday 6pm Huntsville


BADSANTA

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, BMTSoulja1 said:

North Forest beat Central by 5 this year...  Silsbee beat Central by 3....  Think about that AND the fact that North Forest beat Yates as well.  That's why I think it'll be close...

They beat Yates by 19, then turned around and lost the second time by 11.  Interesting.  They've got one kid who is averaging over 29 pts and 11 rbds a game.  They've won 17 of their last 19 and the two loses in that period were to Bellaire and Yates.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, BMTSoulja1 said:

North Forest beat Central by 5 this year...  Silsbee beat Central by 3....  Think about that AND the fact that North Forest beat Yates as well.  That's why I think it'll be close...

and PA Memorial beat NF by 14 while Central lost a game to Memorial and beat Memorial.

Another common opponent for NF and Silsbee: Cleveland

NF beat Cleveland 67-42

Silsbee beat Cleveland 97-52

 

With that said, I believe Silsbee wins by 13+

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, AggiesAreWe said:

I think you will be surprised how close Huffman will make this game

 

I'll be pretty surprised if they can keep it under 20.  I know common opponents don't mean much, but two weeks ago Tarkington lost by 2 to Huffman @ Huffman, and then last week lost to Yates by 59 on a neutral court.  I think Yates and North Forest have inflated records and rankings due to a garbage district, but Huffman has benefitted from a similar situation.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, bullets13 said:

Tigers win 96-77

I'm gonna change my prediction after a little schedule research.  I'm gonna say tigers win 96-67.  North Forest has benefitted from a super soft district schedule, minus Yates, who's getting a lot of credit for a record that also benefitted from the same district schedule. of NF's 18 wins, 12 have come against teams with losing records, including an overtime win against 6-20 Wheatley (took awhile to do all this on MP, so I might be a game off one way or the other, but the numbers are either accurate or close enough).  Their 6 wins against teams with winning records have two pretty nice wins, Beaumont Central, who weren't what they've been the last several years, and Houston Yates, who again benefitted from the same soft schedule.  North Forest played a pretty tough pre-district schedule, but their record is 6-9 against teams with a winning record, and they also had losses to 10-20 Alief Hastings and 14-18 Pasadena Memorial.  They got a pretty easy draw the first couple of games in the playoffs, and looked pretty impressive, but I see them being overwhelmed tonight. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, bullets13 said:

I'm gonna change my prediction after a little schedule research.  I'm gonna say tigers win 96-67.  North Forest has benefitted from a super soft district schedule, minus Yates, who's getting a lot of credit for a record that also benefitted from the same district schedule. of NF's 18 wins, 12 have come against teams with losing records, including an overtime win against 6-20 Wheatley (took awhile to do all this on MP, so I might be a game off one way or the other, but the numbers are either accurate or close enough).  Their 6 wins against teams with winning records have two pretty nice wins, Beaumont Central, who weren't what they've been the last several years, and Houston Yates, who again benefitted from the same soft schedule.  North Forest played a pretty tough pre-district schedule, but their record is 6-9 against teams with a winning record, and they also had losses to 10-20 Alief Hastings and 14-18 Pasadena Memorial.  They got a pretty easy draw the first couple of games in the playoffs, and looked pretty impressive, but I see them being overwhelmed tonight. 

Well, I was right, but it was even worse than I thought!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,935
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    jacobmartin
    Newest Member
    jacobmartin
    Joined


  • Posts

    • This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  
    • Diboll - 1  Central Heights- 0
    • Just to expound a little further, so you are not confused...I, along with so many others, are laughing at your desperation. You are working overtime, nay, double even triple time, trying to convince normal people Trump was bad for the country. His policies provided for peace all over the world, low gas prices, low food prices, energy independence, closed border, low inflation, record low unemployment, and on and on and on. You try to counter this narrative by saying unemployment skyrocketed on his watch. You said this knowing full well the unemployment rate went up due to Covid. Your narrative is just so laughable, to the point of side-splitting hilarity. Who would even attempt this asinine narrative? Now, even if you get past the utter stupidity of that MSNBC talking point, you provide another side-splitting hilarious tidbit of evidence to back your claim of Trump being bad for the country. You actually tried to tie the stock market going down to Trump...after Covid. You, I, and everybody else knows the stock market was flourishing under Trump...until Covid hit. This argument is just as bad as the other one. Again, who would even attempt this narrative? The only thing you could remotely muster that had any sliver of truthfulness, is that spending increased. Sure, Trump rebuilt the military and gave them a deserved raise. But he also had to shut down the government due to Democrats demanding an even more, and very detrimental, increase in spending. And in a true extremely exaggerated fashion, you proclaim that spending "skyrocketed". Again, who would even attempt this narrative? I think I can smell the desperation. Do you have any other whoppers to contribute?
    • He was injured but has returned and he decided not to play baseball this year.
    • There's some truth to that.......some.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...