Jump to content

Huntington VS #1☆Silsbee☆ 1st Round


Who That

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, BADSANTA said:

Not sure why Huntington would want t I talk smack but let the smack talk begin. Silsbee will be ready for the road to San Antonio. 

Someone is trying to get in Silsbee player's heads and start some drama like a few weeks ago.  That is their best option.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seems simple to me...couple kids from Huntington excited to be in the playoffs and play #1 in the state Silsbee, regardless of what seed they are (although JV Coach, they were one game from district champs...follow the district and you'll understand).

And Kountzer, I'd agree with No Look and ST and say just some clean fun.  No one is trying it start anything and if you take that as trying to start something, I would suppose that when my six year old told me after the seeding loss to Hudson "well dad, if you wanna be the best you gotta play the best", he was trying to start something too....smh

So regardless if a thunderstorm is in the area or not, Ill be there to watch two teams battle it out Monday in Livingston...because 1.) I would sure hate to say on Tuesday morning that I missed the game because I didn't want to turn on my windshield wipers and 2.) because I cheer on and follow the Red Devils 24/7/365...not just when they're ranked #1, favored or its convenient...

Good luck to both teams...but cheering for an upset!

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey I for one never have a problem with anything like that as long as it doesn't get personal or negative.  As far as "bring on Silsbee" or prove you are number one,  heck back when I was in a lot better shape and able to compete, it wouldn't have mattered who you put in front of me I would have had that same attitude.  You have to have confidence and want to see where you stand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, butta said:

not just when they're ranked #1, favored or its convenient...

Let me see.  I remember listening to Silsbee play basketball on the radio back in 1968. They had Ralph Davenport and Manuel Tyler on that team.   Were you born then?  I doubt it.  I saw them in person in 1969-70.  1970-1971, and on and on.  When I was in the military I followed them via the newspaper.  No internet back then.   I've probably forgotten more information about my team than you ever knew or know about yours. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,900
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    henrysmith
    Newest Member
    henrysmith
    Joined


  • Posts

    • I don't know who the other coach was, but this guy has no head coaching experience, and minimal high school experience.  He spent last year at cleveland, who was terrible.  He may be great, and I don't care one way or another, but if Liberty passed up a coach with a history of success for a virtual unknown with virtually no previous success I'd be pretty frustrated if I was a panther fan.
    • How do you know that Harrison is not a big opportunity? I don't really know him, but maybe just maybe he is what Liberty needs. I was just wondering what you know about Harrison that doesn't make him a big opportunity. 
    • This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up
    • The last 2 or so minutes are so true
    • Looking back at the exact wording, it seems like you are correct and it was the concrete barriers that were the ultimate problem. I mentioned it in my last comment, even if it was just the barriers, did Texas take his property? I think a case like US v. Causby might go a long way to proving his case. Causby had an egg farm and during World War II, the US government started flying four engine heavy bombers for the war effort, low over his farm at full power. The extremely loud noise killed a bunch of his chickens and caused many of the rest of them to quit laying eggs. Even though he legally still on the property, he sued, saying that the federal government had effectively “taken” the use of his property from him. The US Supreme Court sided with him, saying that for the purposes of the Fifth Amendment, the federal government had indeed taken away the use of his property. It wasn’t intentional but that didn’t matter. It seems like this case would fall somewhere along those lines.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...