Jump to content

Dallas Cowboys 2017


Recommended Posts

13 minutes ago, Tigers2010 said:

What would you guys think about this?

 Dallas Trades- Romo (cap relief), swaps 1st rounders with 49ers (2nd overall), and a 2nd

49ers Trades- 2nd Overall pick

Dallas would then have the pick of the elite DE or CB. My pick would be Marshon Lattimore who is a true shut down CB.

You know more players than I care to keep up with. I only have so much RAM. Lol

I want a defensive end to go with Irving. If they cut Romo after June 1st., they save an extra $8 million towards the cap, as I recall.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, baddog said:

You know more players than I care to keep up with. I only have so much RAM. Lol

I want a defensive end to go with Irving. If they cut Romo after June 1st., they save an extra $8 million towards the cap, as I recall.

HAHA I hear you. He will most likely be cut. Dallas wants too much and doesn't want to package picks needed to make a deal. IMO, out of the first 20 some odd picks before Dallas, at least ten of them will be DB or DE, so there won't be a top guy there. They need to try and find a way to trade into the top 15 at least.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Tigers2010 said:

What would you guys think about this?

 Dallas Trades- Romo (cap relief), swaps 1st rounders with 49ers (2nd overall), and a 2nd

49ers Trades- 2nd Overall pick

Dallas would then have the pick of the elite DE or CB. My pick would be Marshon Lattimore who is a true shut down CB.

Don't know why it quoted this again. Phone has a mind of its own.

Jaylon Smith will be a huge addition to our defense. He and Sean Lee should tear the league a new one. Still need a pass rusher. Blitzes are ok when called properly, but when it is the only way for you to get pressure and you don't get the sack, someone is very open.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, baddog said:

Don't know why it quoted this again. Phone has a mind of its own.

Jaylon Smith will be a huge addition to our defense. He and Sean Lee should tear the league a new one. Still need a pass rusher. Blitzes are ok when called properly, but when it is the only way for you to get pressure and you don't get the sack, someone is very open.

Wouldn't count on him. Everything I have seen recently (days) does not sound optimistic about a return. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, baddog said:

Things can always go south and knees are very difficult, but this is what I found today....

This is the hidden content, please

This is the hidden content, please

I hope he is right. It will be extremely difficult for that to happen though with the nerve not firing. Add the fact that he has to wear this funky brace that limits his movements, it will be tough. 25% speed loss and 45% power loss is going to be difficult for anybody to overcome.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

FRISCO, Texas – The Cowboys have re-signed Brice Butler on the eve of free agency, keeping the four-year veteran receiver in Dallas.

Terms of the deal have not yet been disclosed.

Arriving in a 2015 trade with the Oakland Raiders, Butler has appeared in 23 games with Dallas over the last two seasons, catching 28 passes for 477 yards and three touchdowns.

The Cowboys’ wide receiver depth is still a unclear, though, with Terrance Williams set to become an unrestricted free agent when the new league year begins Thursday at 3 p.m. Central Time.

 

Butler was also set to be an unrestricted free agent Thursday. Speaking at the Senior Bowl in January, Cowboys executive vice president Stephen Jones said the team would like to re-sign both receivers.

 

Williams’ future is unclear, but Butler’s return gives the Cowboys a wideout with starting experience.

A hamstring injury limited Butler to seven games in 2015, but last season he stepped up in three starts for an injured Dez Bryant. Two of his three touchdowns came in starts against the San Francisco 49ers, Cincinnati Bengals and Green Bay Packers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, Romo is going to be released tomorrow.  Hopefully he ends up with a contender and has one or two more shots at a super bowl.  He only had a team capable of winning a ring a couple of times during his career, and got screwed by the "catch/not catch" one year, and hurt another other.  I'll never understand the hate for Romo.  His clutch numbers were through the roof, and the only reason he had so many "chokes" was because the awful team around him constantly put him in situations where 28-35 points wasn't enough, and he performed fantastically in situations where he needed a game winning or tying drive, despite the rhetoric from the haters.  Dallas fans are spoiled, and many of them are too stupid to understand that he's the ONLY reason Dallas has had any relevance for the last 12 or so years, and that without him they're a 4-6 win team every year.  That he played the first decade of his career behind one of the worst O-lines in the league, and still put up fantastic numbers while running for his life.  That his team had a top-10 statistical defense ONCE in his career, and for most of it a garbage running game as well.  Etc. Etc. Etc.  And I'll never understand the hate towards him for not winning a ring.  During the course of his career at dallas, there were 14 superbowls played, and only 8 qbs won at least one.  10 of the championships during that time were won by 4 qbs.  It's not like it's some easy feat that Romo just couldn't manage because he sucked.  While I understand that a superbowl is the main goal of every franchise, it's not prudent to hold a great player, who played great for your team, responsible for the shortcomings of those around him (from the owner on down).   I for one wish Tony the best of luck wherever he ends up, and have thoroughly enjoyed watching him lead the cowboys for the last decade or so. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, bullets13 said:

Well, Romo is going to be released tomorrow.  Hopefully he ends up with a contender and has one or two more shots at a super bowl.  He only had a team capable of winning a ring a couple of times during his career, and got screwed by the "catch/not catch" one year, and hurt another other.  I'll never understand the hate for Romo.  His clutch numbers were through the roof, and the only reason he had so many "chokes" was because the awful team around him constantly put him in situations where 28-35 points wasn't enough, and he performed fantastically in situations where he needed a game winning or tying drive, despite the rhetoric from the haters.  Dallas fans are spoiled, and many of them are too stupid to understand that he's the ONLY reason Dallas has had any relevance for the last 12 or so years, and that without him they're a 4-6 win team every year.  That he played the first decade of his career behind one of the worst O-lines in the league, and still put up fantastic numbers while running for his life.  That his team had a top-10 statistical defense ONCE in his career, and for most of it a garbage running game as well.  Etc. Etc. Etc.  And I'll never understand the hate towards him for not winning a ring.  During the course of his career at dallas, there were 14 superbowls played, and only 8 qbs won at least one.  10 of the championships during that time were won by 4 qbs.  It's not like it's some easy feat that Romo just couldn't manage because he sucked.  While I understand that a superbowl is the main goal of every franchise, it's not prudent to hold a great player, who played great for your team, responsible for the shortcomings of those around him (from the owner on down).   I for one wish Tony the best of luck wherever he ends up, and have thoroughly enjoyed watching him lead the cowboys for the last decade or so. 

I always took Romo's side against the choker argument. He will be missed. However, I have no qualms in saying that Dak is the future and I'm behind him 100%. Lots of QBs end their careers with other teams. Denver looks to be a good spot even though I don't think their defense was as good last season. Good luck Tony.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, baddog said:

I always took Romo's side against the choker argument. He will be missed. However, I have no qualms in saying that Dak is the future and I'm behind him 100%. Lots of QBs end their careers with other teams. Denver looks to be a good spot even though I don't think their defense was as good last season. Good luck Tony.

I was hesitant at first, but Dak earned his spot as the starter

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, BS Wildcats said:

This is the hidden content, please

He seems to have issues with women.  This one could cost him.  JJ may need to get the dumbarse some help.

Too bad it wasn't at Mardi Gras, then it would have been encouraged. They could call it a wardrobe failure like Janet Jackson, and the whole world saw that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,932
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    TRUTHTELLER409
    Newest Member
    TRUTHTELLER409
    Joined



  • Posts

    • Yeah, I got that but talk about a stretch. It should seem obvious that Trump’s prosecution is purely political. If someone is going to do a whataboutism, at least make it similar.  This is so ludicrous that it’s like comparing a ham sandwich to a wallet.   
    • You consistently try to say Trump ran our debt up and that the stock market and job market cratered during his administration (along with other MSNBC talking points). That is a flat out LIE, and you know it. Not only are you telling a mistruth, you knowingly are telling a mistruth...which is a blatant LIE...which makes you a "(I don't remember what word you used to describe Trump, something like a purse for dirt)" does it not? You know for a fact that the economy, stock market, and job market was thriving under Trump. You know that the Democrats controlled the house, and proposed a budget that would hurt the economy, in which he shut down the government. Even after this fiasco brought on by Democrats, our economy flourished under his administration. Then Covid19 hit, and the blue states shut down the country. YOU KNOW THIS, but continue to blame Trump. You lie...blatantly. Again, what do we call these people that partake in disseminating misleading information. You coined it...that purse thing. Does the shoe fit? I bet it does. It is amazing that you try to put "MAGA people" into this little box for the soul purpose of allowing all negative attributes of anyone that will vote for Trump instead of Biden to be attributed. That is a sickening modus operandi of stupid people. It is hard for me to believe that you would adopt that childish stereotyping. But since you are willing, I'm willing to push back. I'm a Trump supporter. I will gladly vote for him over Biden. So get busy putting me in your silly little box of stereotypes so I can embarrass you some more. You've been shot down by practically everyone on this board when you say stuff like Trump is their Messiah, or that supporters overlook his flaws. Everyone on this board has stated that they don't agree with Trump on much of his behavior, but you ignore these statements and continue with your lies. Oh yeah, since I'm a Trump supporter, those comment were also directed directly at me. So let's go. Prove I'm a simpleton that will ignore all of Trump's flaws and vow to disown the bad ol' orangeman. Let's continue that diatribe you peddle. I now am interested in responding. I also have boxes I can place people in. Whose box is accurate? Better yet, whose box is more embarrassing? I'm fairly certain your box is more entertaining for the board to make fun of. TDS should be included in the DSM-6, or revise the DSM-5 to include it since this phenomenon is so pervasive now. You are a walking, talking picture of Trump Derangement Syndrome. Do you like that box? Can you refute the rationale for placing you in that box. Everyone can refute your rationale for placing them into your irrational box, while you languish in your TDS box.
    • Clinton got impeached because of it. David Pecker said it was true about Stormy today. Under oath.
    • Election interference. Cheating.
    • It’s not about worrying about Trump’s morality. It’s about him being held to a totally hypocritical standard that is applied to anybody else that’s not him. Double it if it happens to be a Democrat. What he did to Ted Cruz in 2016, for example. Accused him of extramarital affairs. Really? And the gang cheered the Master on. Sick is what it is.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...