Jump to content

Dallas Cowboys 2017


Recommended Posts

20 minutes ago, Tigers2010 said:

Ahhh. Dallas may lose Williams, but in my opinion, it won't have anything to do with this guy. I may put Lucky out of a job though. Better production for half the price for a return guy.

We still have Butler who we won with while Dez was out. He should move into Williams spot should he bolt. Depth? I really never know. We need defensive linemen who can sack.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like Bulter. The Gregory pick in the 2nd round did not work out and set them back a bit, but getting a healthy Jaylon Smith will be  potential game changer. This draft class is loaded with pass rushers. I expect Dallas to get away from their OL pick in the 1st and grab one. IDK what they have to offer but if they could trade up into the top 15 they could get an elite rusher. And no I do not think a Tony Romo trade would garner a 2nd round pick or better. I think your looking at a 3rd at best, more likely a 4 or 5 in a trade for Romo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, JWB said:

We lost to GB because we couldn't get to Rodgers...we need an elite pass rusher and a true shutdown corner!

I agree, but those are both easier said than done. Though, I think there are 2 "shutdown corners" in the upcoming draft, I don't think any of them fall all the way to Dallas. I think their pick comes down to Jalon Taber CB out of Florida or Sidney Jones CB out of Washington. Ranked #4 and #5 at their position they will be the best available come Cowboys pick. The top three should be gone in the top 15. I think the top 7-10 pass rushers will be gone at that point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
16 hours ago, baddog said:

Mack, have you seen this?......

This is the hidden content, please

I seen a story similar to this a week or so ago. That article said the players being interviewed were playing around or what not, and that he also said he would love to play in Cleveland.

My takes

1. There is no doubt he would rather play for Dallas than Cleveland.

2. Cleveland will most likely take him.

3. Dallas has a 0% chance of trading Tony Romo for the #1 pick. Excluding a crazy package involving Dallas picks 1-3 (which if I was Dallas I would consider)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Tigers2010 said:

I seen a story similar to this a week or so ago. That article said the players being interviewed were playing around or what not, and that he also said he would love to play in Cleveland.

My takes

1. There is no doubt he would rather play for Dallas than Cleveland.

2. Cleveland will most likely take him.

3. Dallas has a 0% chance of trading Tony Romo for the #1 pick. Excluding a crazy package involving Dallas picks 1-3 (which if I was Dallas I would consider)

 

Garrett said to trade Romo and send a couple picks to Cleveland so they can draft him. Cleveland is stupid enough to do it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, baddog said:

Garrett said to trade Romo and send a couple picks to Cleveland so they can draft him. Cleveland is stupid enough to do it.

Maybe they are. I don't know, I think they are trying to smarten up. They know they can't compete even with Romo in 2017, and at his age and injury history he may have 2-3 years tops left. I don't think they are that stupid. But, it is Cleveland.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If trading Romo to get higher in the draft order is the goal, I think the more reasonable outcome is Buffalo at 10. Buffalo believes they are a QB away from making that push. They have an excellent defense and above average skill guys. I could see them entertaining a Romo trade. Cleveland seems like a fantasy wish.

Most things I have read in the last week or so, indicates he is more likely to be outright cut before being traded. Dallas wants more than other teams are willing to part with for a 37 year old QB with his injuries and lack of game action the last couple years. Teams are dealing big based on 1 drive (though impressive) the whole season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,932
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    TRUTHTELLER409
    Newest Member
    TRUTHTELLER409
    Joined



  • Posts

    • Yeah, I got that but talk about a stretch. It should seem obvious that Trump’s prosecution is purely political. If someone is going to do a whataboutism, at least make it similar.  This is so ludicrous that it’s like comparing a ham sandwich to a wallet.   
    • You consistently try to say Trump ran our debt up and that the stock market and job market cratered during his administration (along with other MSNBC talking points). That is a flat out LIE, and you know it. Not only are you telling a mistruth, you knowingly are telling a mistruth...which is a blatant LIE...which makes you a dirtbag does it not? You know for a fact that the economy, stock market, and job market was thriving under Trump. You know that the Democrats controlled the house, and proposed a budget that would hurt the economy, in which he shut down the government. Even after this fiasco brought on by Democrats, our economy flourished under his administration. Then Covid19 hit, and the blue states shut down the country. YOU KNOW THIS, but continue to blame Trump. You lie...blatantly. Again, what do we call these people that partake in disseminating misleading information. You coined it...Dirtbags. Does the shoe fit? I bet it does. It is amazing that you try to put "MAGA people" into this little box for the soul purpose of allowing all negative attributes of anyone that will vote for Trump instead of Biden to be attributed. That is a sickening modus operandi of stupid people. It is hard for me to believe that you would adopt that childish stereotyping. But since you are willing, I'm willing to push back. I'm a Trump supporter. I will gladly vote for him over Biden. So get busy putting me in your silly little box of stereotypes so I can embarrass you some more. You've been shot down by practically everyone on this board when you say stuff like Trump is their Messiah, or that supporters overlook his flaws. Everyone on this board has stated that they don't agree with Trump on much of his behavior, but you ignore these statements and continue with your lies. Oh yeah, since I'm a Trump supporter, those comment were also directed directly at me. So let's go. Prove I'm a simpleton that will ignore all of Trump's flaws and vow to disown the bad ol' orangeman. Let's continue that diatribe you peddle. I now am interested in responding. I also have boxes I can place people in. Whose box is accurate? Better yet, whose box is more embarrassing? I'm fairly certain your box is more entertaining for the board to make fun of. TDS should be included in the DSM-6, or revise the DSM-5 to include it since this phenomenon is so pervasive now. You are a walking, talking picture of Trump Derangement Syndrome. Do you like that box? Can you refute the rationale for placing you in that box. Everyone can refute your rationale for placing them into your irrational box, while you languish in your TDS box.
    • Clinton got impeached because of it. David Pecker said it was true about Stormy today. Under oath.
    • Election interference. Cheating.
    • It’s not about worrying about Trump’s morality. It’s about him being held to a totally hypocritical standard that is applied to anybody else that’s not him. Double it if it happens to be a Democrat. What he did to Ted Cruz in 2016, for example. Accused him of extramarital affairs. Really? And the gang cheered the Master on. Sick is what it is.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...