Jump to content

West Brook's Flanigan reinstated


AggiesAreWe

Recommended Posts

43 minutes ago, Tigers2010 said:

and(B) with intent to arouse or gratify the sexual desire of any person;

(ii) arouse or gratify the sexual desire of any person;  or

Look, the people who investigated the action know the law better than we do. They can interpret the law better than we can. They concluded no law was broken. Ya'll can post all the links to the penal code you want. They looked at it and found no law violate. So what is the point of posting a link to a law that was not broken?

You can "break the law" and not be relieved of your duties. It's not cut and dry.

There was an issue, it was investigated, and the outcome has been determined. As a person with no dog in this hunt, I am happy with the outcome.

I am willing to bet that there will not be any cameras in the locker-rooms. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Bandwagon Ranger said:

You can "break the law" and not be relieved of your duties. It's not cut and dry.

There was an issue, it was investigated, and the outcome has been determined. As a person with no dog in this hunt, I am happy with the outcome.

I am willing to bet that there will not be any cameras in the locker-rooms. 

Yes you can, but that isn't the case here. It was determined he didn't break the law.

And I am with you, I am glad he was not terminated, and I doubt the camera he put up is still there. For one, he caught the thief so there is no point, and two, I am sure he doesn't want to deal with this again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/11/2017 at 7:46 PM, BMTSoulja1 said:

Casual observation.  Most of the people th ata glad that he's reinstated is only because they want little Johnny to keep his starting spot and not have to compete for it next year.... At least that's word around town.  

Maybe that's the case for some. I, on the other hand have heard nothing but good things about the Coach from not only a coaching perspective but a character perception as well. It may be only my opinion, but I believe Beaumont ISD is lucky to have a guy like that at the helm of it's largest ISD concerning all things athletics. Perhaps, there are many who are unappreciative. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,900
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    henrysmith
    Newest Member
    henrysmith
    Joined



  • Posts

    • 13,000,000 trespassers…..”Book ‘em Dano”. Hey, we could all sit around and sing “Kumbaya”. If 13,000,000 illegals doesn’t constitute an invasion, what is the other name…..a road trip?
    • I don't know anything about Harrison other than the fact that his coaching history is limited, at best. Social media seems to indicate he has been given the Athletic Director and Head Coach title, which is even more baffling for a guy who has not one iota of experience in either role. Especially when Karen Slack is right there in house. All I know is this: there was absolutely a candidate on their list, who they interviewed, who has 20+ years' experience as a SUCCESSFUL AD/HC in the SETX area. He would've been a slam dunk hire and gotten folks in Liberty excited about playing football again, especially with the group of young kids they have coming up through the ranks. Unfortunately, they decided to take a different route. Like I said, I am not throwing shade at Harrison, everybody has to get their first job somewhere. I just hope Liberty didn't pass a great opportunity for some reason other than thinking Harrison was the superior candidate. 
    • Idiot. Stop posting half baked caca. Per the Texas Public Policy Institute, “The American history of the term invasion reveals that its literal meaning is entry plus enmity. Entry alone, which is trespass, is not sufficient to constitute an invasion”. Stop lying.
    • What replaces it? If anything cut spending and lower taxes.  
    • Ok. Couldn’t let this one pass.  All the countries listed are countries that Russian interests prefer we and our allies leave alone (to them). Any thoughts, pea brain?
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...