Jump to content

Bridge City V.S Stafford


BC Cardinal97

Recommended Posts

What a long way Staffords program has come. BC beat them down pretty bad in 2010 and 11. Stafford actually had a player get handcuffed and escorted off the field by police for getting into a fight with a teammate on the field. I realize both these programs have changed tremendously but I like BC's shot vs anyone right now. Here's to a great game. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, SpiceUp said:

Stafford By 3 TDs. I think BC only beat Bay City because all the key injuries in the game I wasnt impressed really. Stafford is legit. No hate just my thought.

Center was a better team than bay city. QB and Rb's were good but defense was average. Stafford only beat Kilgore by a touchdown, center beat Kilgore we beat center it's a toss up. If bc can eliminate the penalties they can play with stafford I'm taking bc by a touchdown. GO BIG RED!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, baseball_101 said:

Center was a better team than bay city. QB and Rb's were good but defense was average. Stafford only beat Kilgore by a touchdown, center beat Kilgore we beat center it's a toss up. If bc can eliminate the penalties they can play with stafford I'm taking bc by a touchdown. GO BIG RED!!

Now someone with some sense. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, baseball_101 said:

Center was a better team than bay city. QB and Rb's were good but defense was average. Stafford only beat Kilgore by a touchdown, center beat Kilgore we beat center it's a toss up. If bc can eliminate the penalties they can play with stafford I'm taking bc by a touchdown. GO BIG RED!!

Just my take. Bridge City was an average team to me that beat a un healthy YOUNG Bay City team that will most likely win its district next year. But Stafford is a different machine then Bay City and too me you all's secondary wasn't very impressive. Like I stated Stafford by 3TD's you all will not have enough speed to beat them. And that Slot T not going to fool them. Defensively you all didn't stop Bay City until after their QB went down if you want to be honest and Stafford O is way better then Bay City's. I'm not a homer so I don't have to be Bias I just like high school football.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SpiceUp said:

Just my take. Bridge City was an average team to me that beat a un healthy YOUNG Bay City team that will most likely win its district next year. But Stafford is a different machine then Bay City and too me you all's secondary wasn't very impressive. Like I stated Stafford by 3TD's you all will not have enough speed to beat them. And that Slot T not going to fool them. Defensively you all didn't stop Bay City until after their QB went down if you want to be honest and Stafford O is way better then Bay City's. I'm not a homer so I don't have to be Bias I just like high school football.

I respect your opinion, but disagree defensively we did stop them before their QB went out l, we just didn't capitalize on the opportunities we were given. Penalties hurt us. The more opportunities you give your opponent, the more points they are likely to score. I don't believe we are going to face any better talent than what we have already faced this season. I don't believe stafford is that good. But, I guess we will find out come Friday. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,933
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    jacobmartin
    Newest Member
    jacobmartin
    Joined


  • Posts

    • Yeah, I got that but talk about a stretch. It should seem obvious that Trump’s prosecution is purely political. If someone is going to do a whataboutism, at least make it similar.  This is so ludicrous that it’s like comparing a ham sandwich to a wallet.   
    • You consistently try to say Trump ran our debt up and that the stock market and job market cratered during his administration (along with other MSNBC talking points). That is a flat out LIE, and you know it. Not only are you telling a mistruth, you knowingly are telling a mistruth...which is a blatant LIE...which makes you a "(I don't remember what word you used to describe Trump, something like a purse for dirt)" does it not? You know for a fact that the economy, stock market, and job market was thriving under Trump. You know that the Democrats controlled the house, and proposed a budget that would hurt the economy, in which he shut down the government. Even after this fiasco brought on by Democrats, our economy flourished under his administration. Then Covid19 hit, and the blue states shut down the country. YOU KNOW THIS, but continue to blame Trump. You lie...blatantly. Again, what do we call these people that partake in disseminating misleading information. You coined it...that purse thing. Does the shoe fit? I bet it does. It is amazing that you try to put "MAGA people" into this little box for the soul purpose of allowing all negative attributes of anyone that will vote for Trump instead of Biden to be attributed. That is a sickening modus operandi of stupid people. It is hard for me to believe that you would adopt that childish stereotyping. But since you are willing, I'm willing to push back. I'm a Trump supporter. I will gladly vote for him over Biden. So get busy putting me in your silly little box of stereotypes so I can embarrass you some more. You've been shot down by practically everyone on this board when you say stuff like Trump is their Messiah, or that supporters overlook his flaws. Everyone on this board has stated that they don't agree with Trump on much of his behavior, but you ignore these statements and continue with your lies. Oh yeah, since I'm a Trump supporter, those comments were also directed directly at me. So let's go. Prove I'm a simpleton that will ignore all of Trump's flaws and vow to disown the bad ol' orangeman. Let's continue that diatribe you peddle. I now am interested in responding. I also have boxes I can place people in. Whose box is accurate? Better yet, whose box is more embarrassing? I'm fairly certain your box is more entertaining for the board to make fun of. TDS should be included in the DSM-6, or revise the DSM-5 to include it since this phenomenon is so pervasive now. You are a walking, talking picture of Trump Derangement Syndrome. Do you like that box? Can you refute the rationale for placing you in that box. Everyone can refute your rationale for placing them into your irrational box, while you languish in your TDS box.
    • Clinton got impeached because of it. David Pecker said it was true about Stormy today. Under oath.
    • Election interference. Cheating.
    • It’s not about worrying about Trump’s morality. It’s about him being held to a totally hypocritical standard that is applied to anybody else that’s not him. Double it if it happens to be a Democrat. What he did to Ted Cruz in 2016, for example. Accused him of extramarital affairs. Really? And the gang cheered the Master on. Sick is what it is.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...