Jump to content

THE OFFICIAL MCM, LETS GET IT ON, BEST RIVALRY IN THE STATE THREAD


Stattrax

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, rykerx144 said:

There is more trash talk over whether it  is the best rivalry more than there is trash talk over the game.  

I think I know why... Ned fans aren't talking trash because we know we are the underdogs. PN-G fans aren't talking trash cause they've lost 6 straight in the series and were favored in at least 3 of those ball games. MCM... anything can happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/30/2016 at 5:52 AM, MAYFIELD said:

Soulja you must have sat in the powder cloud to long, get out the student section. Dogs win out and Indians can cry again for 7 straight years.

 

On 11/1/2016 at 8:09 PM, The Icon said:

Class 99 - I don't necessarily disagree with everything you post, but your complete disregard for grammatical correctness kills me.

Lol i don't really care i just write but if it would make you feel better i will get down to grammer,lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/31/2016 at 4:22 PM, Buddy Garrity said:

No prediction from me.... Not a betting man, but if I was it would have to be for LN.... When they need it, they usually get it.... Maybe BF figures it out....

I have a feeling FB figures it out this year if not then he might just be figuring out where to go,lol,not my words just the word on the street.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/1/2016 at 8:34 PM, MAYFIELD said:

I wish I could reply to post but it won't let me, so class 99 we will win not only by ground, and yes we have ground gain. I think this thing will be won in the trenches, where the real Dogs play. And sleep on the air game, it works when needed.

We will shut that back down brother he is not hindes our def is better than you think as far as Nederlands qb he won't be the factor,but im sure he will get yards but they will be hard earned ones,oh and Png,s back is pretty good him self it all makes for another classic.I talk alot of smack but i'm not going to be convinced until i see us winning in the 4th and the clock runs out.js

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/1/2016 at 8:34 PM, MAYFIELD said:

I wish I could reply to post but it won't let me, so class 99 we will win not only by ground, and yes we have ground gain. I think this thing will be won in the trenches, where the real Dogs play. And sleep on the air game, it works when needed.

Lol yeah i know what yall have i have watched three of the dogs games,yall will need to play better than against Train to beat Indians just the facts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So here it is......

PN-G has the horses in this game to win. Both on offense and defense.

Offensively, just stay patient and do your thing. Eventually things are going to work....

Neauman and Company are going to take away something.. If they spy, thats advantage PN-G.

Defensively, PN-G will need to be able to adjust to whatever Monte throws at us. And I am quite sure he will have something gimmicked up to throw us off.

Nederland has the horses to win this thing just as much as PN-G.

The x factor on the whole game is RJ... Unlike years in the past, this kid can Beat you in multiple ways. He will be the best athlete on that field.....

So on paper, once again, you can make a case for PN-G.... But Nederland has the X factor... Ole Larry Ballgame....

If i was BF, I would go out, call my game, and try to beat LN doing what we do.. No onsides kicks, 2 point conversion attempts, gadget plays. Play smart, and mistake free......

If I was LN, I would make PN-G one dimensional if I could...... Load the box, spy on the QB, and make the kid beat me...... 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Buddy Garrity said:

So here it is......

PN-G has the horses in this game to win. Both on offense and defense.

Offensively, just stay patient and do your thing. Eventually things are going to work....

Neauman and Company are going to take away something.. If they spy, thats advantage PN-G.

Defensively, PN-G will need to be able to adjust to whatever Monte throws at us. And I am quite sure he will have something gimmicked up to throw us off.

Nederland has the horses to win this thing just as much as PN-G.

The x factor on the whole game is RJ... Unlike years in the past, this kid can Beat you in multiple ways. He will be the best athlete on that field.....

So on paper, once again, you can make a case for PN-G.... But Nederland has the X factor... Ole Larry Ballgame....

If i was BF, I would go out, call my game, and try to beat LN doing what we do.. No onsides kicks, 2 point conversion attempts, gadget plays. Play smart, and mistake free......

If I was LN, I would make PN-G one dimensional if I could...... Load the box, spy on the QB, and make the kid beat me...... 

 

Ned will do everything possible to keep him in that pocket, I think the d line will play flat most of the night, he is dangerous on the move.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, biaplayer said:
3 hours ago, biaplayer said:

This may be the quietest year I have ever seen out of James Mosley, Might be the year James Ware gives James Mosley a pie in the puss lol

This may be the quietest year I have ever seen out of James Mosley, Might be the year James Ware gives James Mosley a pie in the puss lol

Not a lot of smack coming from either side. Has a weird feel in the air about the game this year. Everyone knows PNG has the better team, hands down, but there is just something about the game this year that has the PNG faithful a little nervous!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, James Mosley said:

Not a lot of smack coming from either side. Has a weird feel in the air about the game this year. Everyone knows PNG has the better team, hands down, but there is just something about the game this year that has the PNG faithful a little nervous!!

Teams are very equal in my opinion other than the QB position. If Ned QB can make the throws when he needs them then Ned could be in a position to win it at the end.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,933
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    jacobmartin
    Newest Member
    jacobmartin
    Joined



  • Posts

    • Yeah, I got that but talk about a stretch. It should seem obvious that Trump’s prosecution is purely political. If someone is going to do a whataboutism, at least make it similar.  This is so ludicrous that it’s like comparing a ham sandwich to a wallet.   
    • You consistently try to say Trump ran our debt up and that the stock market and job market cratered during his administration (along with other MSNBC talking points). That is a flat out LIE, and you know it. Not only are you telling a mistruth, you knowingly are telling a mistruth...which is a blatant LIE...which makes you a "(I don't remember what word you used to describe Trump, something like a purse for dirt)" does it not? You know for a fact that the economy, stock market, and job market was thriving under Trump. You know that the Democrats controlled the house, and proposed a budget that would hurt the economy, in which he shut down the government. Even after this fiasco brought on by Democrats, our economy flourished under his administration. Then Covid19 hit, and the blue states shut down the country. YOU KNOW THIS, but continue to blame Trump. You lie...blatantly. Again, what do we call these people that partake in disseminating misleading information. You coined it...that purse thing. Does the shoe fit? I bet it does. It is amazing that you try to put "MAGA people" into this little box for the soul purpose of allowing all negative attributes of anyone that will vote for Trump instead of Biden to be attributed. That is a sickening modus operandi of stupid people. It is hard for me to believe that you would adopt that childish stereotyping. But since you are willing, I'm willing to push back. I'm a Trump supporter. I will gladly vote for him over Biden. So get busy putting me in your silly little box of stereotypes so I can embarrass you some more. You've been shot down by practically everyone on this board when you say stuff like Trump is their Messiah, or that supporters overlook his flaws. Everyone on this board has stated that they don't agree with Trump on much of his behavior, but you ignore these statements and continue with your lies. Oh yeah, since I'm a Trump supporter, those comments were also directed directly at me. So let's go. Prove I'm a simpleton that will ignore all of Trump's flaws and vow to disown the bad ol' orangeman. Let's continue that diatribe you peddle. I now am interested in responding. I also have boxes I can place people in. Whose box is accurate? Better yet, whose box is more embarrassing? I'm fairly certain your box is more entertaining for the board to make fun of. TDS should be included in the DSM-6, or revise the DSM-5 to include it since this phenomenon is so pervasive now. You are a walking, talking picture of Trump Derangement Syndrome. Do you like that box? Can you refute the rationale for placing you in that box. Everyone can refute your rationale for placing them into your irrational box, while you languish in your TDS box.
    • Clinton got impeached because of it. David Pecker said it was true about Stormy today. Under oath.
    • Election interference. Cheating.
    • It’s not about worrying about Trump’s morality. It’s about him being held to a totally hypocritical standard that is applied to anybody else that’s not him. Double it if it happens to be a Democrat. What he did to Ted Cruz in 2016, for example. Accused him of extramarital affairs. Really? And the gang cheered the Master on. Sick is what it is.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...