Jump to content

12-4A II district tiebreakers


Bobkat

Recommended Posts

It's usually point differential with a maximum number set to prevent purposeful blowouts.  I don't know what the max number is set at currently.  It used to be 18 or something near there.

Liberty is currently +15 against OF and -3 against HJ which = +12

HJ is +3 against Liberty = +3

OF is -15 against Liberty = -15

If that's the way it still works Orangefield would have to beat Hardin-Jefferson by 9 points to get the 3rd seed in the district as that would put both OF and HJ at -6 and OF would get the higher seed due to the head-to-head game.  

For OF to get the 2nd seed they would have to beat HJ by at least 28 points to pass Liberty in point differential which I believe is above whatever the maximum limit is so it probably isn't possible.

Of course given OF and Liberty both lose to WOS.

 

This is just a guess given the way ties have been broken in the past.  The rules are set by each district committee and can be completely different for every district which makes it no fun trying to figure out come this time of year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Goblin said:

It's usually point differential with a maximum number set to prevent purposeful blowouts.  I don't know what the max number is set at currently.  It used to be 18 or something near there.

Liberty is currently +15 against OF and -3 against HJ which = +12

HJ is +3 against Liberty = +3

OF is -15 against Liberty = -15

If that's the way it still works Orangefield would have to beat Hardin-Jefferson by 9 points to get the 3rd seed in the district as that would put both OF and HJ at -6 and OF would get the higher seed due to the head-to-head game.  

For OF to get the 2nd seed they would have to beat HJ by at least 28 points to pass Liberty in point differential which I believe is above whatever the maximum limit is so it probably isn't possible.

Of course given OF and Liberty both lose to WOS.

 

This is just a guess given the way ties have been broken in the past.  The rules are set by each district committee and can be completely different for every district which makes it no fun trying to figure out come this time of year.

I have just been told that the max number is 16 for 12-4A-II.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,895
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    ronanhugo529
    Newest Member
    ronanhugo529
    Joined


  • Posts

    • Yeah I remember the pictures of the water piled up on the north side of the highway, it was bad.
    • That’s a president? How embarrassing. 
    • Really good hire! As I stated previously on this thread, Mike T has been an essential part of WB’s success the last few years & is a student of the game & I have a ton of respect for how he goes about things as a coach. Big on teaching kids how to do things the right way to prepare them for not only basketball but the game of life. He’ll be fine there, my only question is what kind of talent does WB have returning?  Best thing about this situation for Mike T is WB will be 5A for at least the next 2 years, so he should win a lot of games & have some deep playoff runs.
    • So which coaches kid gets the QB job? Trotter or Barrier
    • A Winnie land owner (and others) sued the State of Texas after they built IH-10 a few feet higher in order to help contain storm flooding. Sure enough a hurricane hit and flooded the land. The storm improvements worked!! Unfortunately the state sacrificed several people’s properties in using the interstate highway as a dam.  Richard DeVillier tried to sue Texas under our laws and Constitution and the US Constitution under the Fifth Amendment “taking clause” (eminent domain). After a favorable ruling in the federal district court on the right to sue Texas directly, the Fifth Circuit Court in New Orleans overturned that ruling and said that the DeVlier had no authority to sue Texas directly.  On Tuesday a unanimous US Supreme Court ruled that DeVillier and others had the right to sue Texas directly under Texas law and under the Fifth Amendment of the US Constitution. The case is now sent back down to the lower court. DeVillier and others have not won their lawsuits as the case has not been decided on its merits at a trial. He still has to go to prove his case. What they did win was a unanimous Supreme Court agreeing that he has the right to bring Texas to trial for taking his property with just compensation.   
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...