Jump to content

Bridge City vs WOS


adminbaberuth

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, skipper said:

wo-s could care less who they play  because it will not happen 6a and 5 a teams shy away and yes the kids from wo-s did play a 5a school and lost both times  that's life all in the past who cares

I don't care and I wish you guys an injury free season, and hope to see you again playing for the state championship. I was just replying to a post that said he thought you would be ranked in top 10, two divisions above you. I was just wondering where he would put them as their are some strong teams also at that level. Again, good luck!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 - 21 WOS. If anyone knows how to play the 'Stangs, it's Dwayne Dubois. I think BC will keep it a little closer than everyone thinks they will. Slot-T gives WOS fits because it nullifies a little speed on defense but BC's defense won't be able to control Jack Dallas and co. I liken it to Vidor's scrimmage with the Ponies. Still, just a bump in the road to state.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

WOS is bringing back 16 or so starters as defending state champions. Anybody that doesn't favor them in this matchup is delirious. They SHOULD win this game. nobody is kidding themselves about how special the Mustangs are this year.  

Bruce Lee once said that he wasn't scared of a man that knew 10,000 different kicks.... He was scared of a man that knew one kick, but had practiced it 10,000 times. We're going to run on WOS.  Believe that. BC wins this one in a dogfight. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CardinalBacker said:

WOS is bringing back 16 or so starters as defending state champions. Anybody that doesn't favor them in this matchup is delirious. They SHOULD win this game. nobody is kidding themselves about how special the Mustangs are this year.  

Bruce Lee once said that he wasn't scared of a man that knew 10,000 different kicks.... He was scared of a man that knew one kick, but had practiced it 10,000 times. We're going to run on WOS.  Believe that. BC wins this one in a dogfight. 

Run on the Stangs, yes. Run effectively, no. History does not hold well for BC to win. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Cardinals may base their game plan on running the ball up the middle like Dubois did at HJ, one factor that may stop this plan is the difference in the running backs. I can’t remember that kids name who ran the ball well for HJ, and was able to get long yardage up the middle a couple of years ago, he was very athletic, big and strong. Unless BC has a couple of backs like that, even running the ball up the middle will be a tall task over and over.  I believe the Stangs will shut down the middle and force the Cardinals to open the field where they (the Stangs) will have the advantage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Lightning/Eagle said:

Yep, I can live with that. But 10 is Angleton and that would be a tough game for you guys. Not knocking WOS at all. Most definetly a legit title contender but not sure they would be top 10 in 5A. Some really good programs also with tradition in 5A.

Oh I'm not from WOS, I just became a big fan of them after seeing their head coach interviewed after the state champ game last year 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, robanadana said:

42 - 21 WOS. If anyone knows how to play the 'Stangs, it's Dwayne Dubois. I think BC will keep it a little closer than everyone thinks they will. Slot-T gives WOS fits because it nullifies a little speed on defense but BC's defense won't be able to control Jack Dallas and co. I liken it to Vidor's scrimmage with the Ponies. Still, just a bump in the road to state.

Lol BC is not scoring 21 on WOS 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On Saturday, September 03, 2016 at 11:12 AM, aTmfan06 said:

Kennadale runs the slot T

And !! Doesn't matter. They have great athletes too. But when ur one dimensional makes it dat much harder. If u ever knew the history of w.o. ND I do mean years of pride on stopping the run. U want beat them that way. Once again if you truly watch what the d-line does against teams then u would know where I come from. Momo and Mandel king is on another level . Right now it's all abt BC . Kennedale will get there chance in a few weeks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Majestyk said:

West Orange-Stark  49  Bridge City 7.  I will go out on a limb and give the Cardinals one score.  I do believe Bridge City will go on and have a great season. But they have not seen anything like is going to be heading down highway 87 south this Friday night since who flung the chunk.  Seriously.

Agree!

It would behoove the Cardinals not to count on running on the Mustang defense as if this will be their opening to get points, smh. The Cardinals have a fantastic coach and if the young Dubois was able to play I might agree that the Cardinals would score. Young Dubois is a hell of a QB.  I would like to know more about the Cardinals backfield, I might be missing something.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, BC is back said:

A WOS fan was the one who brought up the old days giving us credit from middle school a couple weeks back. Saying we were gonna be there biggest test tis season. Just a repeat of what was said. that was the last time these classes met. The past varsity scores have nothing to do with this year. Just be ready come friday

lol. Really just come ready. When have WOS not come ready. Dude its one thing to believe in your team, but another thing to think that WOS wont be prepared. I have seen good teams and Great teams and WOS definitely falls into the GREAT category this year. I thought we were great last year (and we were), but this year we are really better than last. BC is no slouch I understand that but to think you are going to be anything more than pebble on the road  well my friend your in for a rude awakening come Friday night. LCM had 2 not 1 but 2 stud running backs and look where that got them a mear 4 first downs. I commend your school spirit but to tell us to be READY? SMH.

WOS 35+

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Look everybody knows what Duboise (sp) has done in BC has been remarkable but to think that this games is going to be close is crazy. WOS has yet play 4 quarters of football with it starters and honestly hasn't even really been challenged yet. Do I think BC will make some plays and even score, yes I do but the outcome is  going to be all about the same.

WOS - 42

BC - 10

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, robanadana said:

42 - 21 WOS. If anyone knows how to play the 'Stangs, it's Dwayne Dubois. I think BC will keep it a little closer than everyone thinks they will. Slot-T gives WOS fits because it nullifies a little speed on defense but BC's defense won't be able to control Jack Dallas and co. I liken it to Vidor's scrimmage with the Ponies. Still, just a bump in the road to state.

When has he showed he knows how to attack us? When has the Slot-T given us fits? We saw it, what, 7 times last year? I see it quite opposite!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 i guess BC has reason to be optimistic, just not this game here. Just dont have the athletes to match up. WO-S is also disciplined and experienced in addition to being talented. If you don't check off those 3 boxes, no chance to beat them no matter how much hope or heart you have. i believe its as simple as that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Member Statistics

    45,933
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    jacobmartin
    Newest Member
    jacobmartin
    Joined



  • Posts

    • Yeah, I got that but talk about a stretch. It should seem obvious that Trump’s prosecution is purely political. If someone is going to do a whataboutism, at least make it similar.  This is so ludicrous that it’s like comparing a ham sandwich to a wallet.   
    • You consistently try to say Trump ran our debt up and that the stock market and job market cratered during his administration (along with other MSNBC talking points). That is a flat out LIE, and you know it. Not only are you telling a mistruth, you knowingly are telling a mistruth...which is a blatant LIE...which makes you a "(I don't remember what word you used to describe Trump, something like a purse for dirt)" does it not? You know for a fact that the economy, stock market, and job market was thriving under Trump. You know that the Democrats controlled the house, and proposed a budget that would hurt the economy, in which he shut down the government. Even after this fiasco brought on by Democrats, our economy flourished under his administration. Then Covid19 hit, and the blue states shut down the country. YOU KNOW THIS, but continue to blame Trump. You lie...blatantly. Again, what do we call these people that partake in disseminating misleading information. You coined it...that purse thing. Does the shoe fit? I bet it does. It is amazing that you try to put "MAGA people" into this little box for the soul purpose of allowing all negative attributes of anyone that will vote for Trump instead of Biden to be attributed. That is a sickening modus operandi of stupid people. It is hard for me to believe that you would adopt that childish stereotyping. But since you are willing, I'm willing to push back. I'm a Trump supporter. I will gladly vote for him over Biden. So get busy putting me in your silly little box of stereotypes so I can embarrass you some more. You've been shot down by practically everyone on this board when you say stuff like Trump is their Messiah, or that supporters overlook his flaws. Everyone on this board has stated that they don't agree with Trump on much of his behavior, but you ignore these statements and continue with your lies. Oh yeah, since I'm a Trump supporter, those comments were also directed directly at me. So let's go. Prove I'm a simpleton that will ignore all of Trump's flaws and vow to disown the bad ol' orangeman. Let's continue that diatribe you peddle. I now am interested in responding. I also have boxes I can place people in. Whose box is accurate? Better yet, whose box is more embarrassing? I'm fairly certain your box is more entertaining for the board to make fun of. TDS should be included in the DSM-6, or revise the DSM-5 to include it since this phenomenon is so pervasive now. You are a walking, talking picture of Trump Derangement Syndrome. Do you like that box? Can you refute the rationale for placing you in that box. Everyone can refute your rationale for placing them into your irrational box, while you languish in your TDS box.
    • Clinton got impeached because of it. David Pecker said it was true about Stormy today. Under oath.
    • Election interference. Cheating.
    • It’s not about worrying about Trump’s morality. It’s about him being held to a totally hypocritical standard that is applied to anybody else that’s not him. Double it if it happens to be a Democrat. What he did to Ted Cruz in 2016, for example. Accused him of extramarital affairs. Really? And the gang cheered the Master on. Sick is what it is.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...