Jump to content

11 STATES SUE OBAMA ADMIN OVER BATHROOM/LOCKER ROOMS


Hagar

Recommended Posts

Texas also was leading the charge when the government started allowing blacks to use public restrooms, restaurants, swimming pools, movie theaters, eat.........ok maybe it was the good ole south.....but it worked itself out. some would still rather not share facilities with blacks and some of you on this board know it. The government had to go to war with the south for equal rights. The government and the north won.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, nappyroots said:

Texas also was leading the charge when the government started allowing blacks to use public restrooms, restaurants, swimming pools, movie theaters, eat.........ok maybe it was the good ole south.....but it worked itself out. some would still rather not share facilities with blacks and some of you on this board know it. The government had to go to war with the south for equal rights. The government and the north won.

Apparently you have no knowledge of history. Are you actually trying to claim that the North went to war over Civil Rights? Really? Is that what you are claiming? You must be a Democrat.

And there are a lot of blacks who do not want to share facilities with whites.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, nappyroots said:

Texas also was leading the charge when the government started allowing blacks to use public restrooms, restaurants, swimming pools, movie theaters, eat.........ok maybe it was the good ole south.....but it worked itself out. some would still rather not share facilities with blacks and some of you on this board know it. The government had to go to war with the south for equal rights. The government and the north won.

Why do some folks always go here...smh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lol, same old thing.  When you can't logically defend your position, throw out something that happened 150 years ago, or blame Bush.  I don't think those that defend this Decree, fully understand the implications.  The ability of a person with a penis to change and shower with girls is just not right to the majority of people.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like i said before.... blacks were not allowed to drink water from the same water fountain as whites, had to eat in the back of the restaurant and enter from the back door(but could cook in the kitchen, how stupid was that) could not use the same restroom, had to sit in the balcony at movies, couldn't attend the same school, had to ride at the back of the bus, couldn't live in the same neigborhood, whites had worse fears of blacks being near their families than they do of transgenders, they are only worried about transgenders in the bathroom. was worried about blacks in every aspect of life other than doing their chores for FREE STUFF.( I mean for free). Some god conservative christians would like to MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN and bring back some of the good conservative values that I just mentioned. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, nappyroots said:

Like i said before.... blacks were not allowed to drink water from the same water fountain as whites, had to eat in the back of the restaurant and enter from the back door(but could cook in the kitchen, how stupid was that) could not use the same restroom, had to sit in the balcony at movies, couldn't attend the same school, had to ride at the back of the bus, couldn't live in the same neigborhood, whites had worse fears of blacks being near their families than they do of transgenders, they are only worried about transgenders in the bathroom. was worried about blacks in every aspect of life other than doing their chores for FREE STUFF.( I mean for free). Some god conservative christians would like to MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN and bring back some of the good conservative values that I just mentioned. 

Let me see if I understand you correctly.  The fact that many republicans ( and others as well) dont want to let transgenders use a girls bathroom when they are biologically a boy means that they want to bring back the black/white issues that have been largely resolved?

Quote

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

It’s wild that this administration will actually follow the law.......

 

Asked for further explanation on the department’s position, Hill said Friday, “Title IX prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex, not gender identity.”

 

This is the hidden content, please

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/25/2016 at 5:48 PM, nappyroots said:

Texas also was leading the charge when the government started allowing blacks to use public restrooms, restaurants, swimming pools, movie theaters, eat.........ok maybe it was the good ole south.....but it worked itself out. some would still rather not share facilities with blacks and some of you on this board know it. The government had to go to war with the south for equal rights. The government and the north won.

So are you equating your skin with other peoples sin?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, 77 said:

I am perfectly okay with using restrooms with any color person out there but with the latest liberal attack called #metoo  and I am okay with that but I dont want a woman or girl in the mens restroom to accuse me of something .  Look in your pants and it is very easy to know which RR to use!

Where were all these confused people peeing before?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,935
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    jacobmartin
    Newest Member
    jacobmartin
    Joined


  • Posts

    • This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  
    • Diboll - 1  Central Heights- 0
    • Just to expound a little further, so you are not confused...I, along with so many others, are laughing at your desperation. You are working overtime, nay, double even triple time, trying to convince normal people Trump was bad for the country. His policies provided for peace all over the world, low gas prices, low food prices, energy independence, closed border, low inflation, record low unemployment, and on and on and on. You try to counter this narrative by saying unemployment skyrocketed on his watch. You said this knowing full well the unemployment rate went up due to Covid. Your narrative is just so laughable, to the point of side-splitting hilarity. Who would even attempt this asinine narrative? Now, even if you get past the utter stupidity of that MSNBC talking point, you provide another side-splitting hilarious tidbit of evidence to back your claim of Trump being bad for the country. You actually tried to tie the stock market going down to Trump...after Covid. You, I, and everybody else knows the stock market was flourishing under Trump...until Covid hit. This argument is just as bad as the other one. Again, who would even attempt this narrative? The only thing you could remotely muster that had any sliver of truthfulness, is that spending increased. Sure, Trump rebuilt the military and gave them a deserved raise. But he also had to shut down the government due to Democrats demanding an even more, and very detrimental, increase in spending. And in a true extremely exaggerated fashion, you proclaim that spending "skyrocketed". Again, who would even attempt this narrative? I think I can smell the desperation. Do you have any other whoppers to contribute?
    • He was injured but has returned and he decided not to play baseball this year.
    • There's some truth to that.......some.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...