Jump to content

Today is Appeals Day at UIL

AggiesAreWe

By AggiesAreWe
in High School Football

 Share

Recommended Posts

AggiesAreWe

AggiesAreWe

Posted
Posted

Today is the day UIL will hear all appeals in regards to the realignment this past Feb. 1. We will know the status of Beaumont West Brook and Beaumont Harmony Science appeals later today.

Also big news regarding Livingston. It appears that Livingston turned in inaccurate numbers for realignment. Their accurate snap shot number actually will keep them in 5A. Will be interesting to see how UIL handles this.

If Livingston goes back to 5A (which they should) this will cause several teams to look for games to complete their 10 game schedule.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 105
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

BMTSoulja1
BMTSoulja1

This!  I hate it!

Pepper Brooks
Pepper Brooks

Livingston just went from a chance to making the playoffs in 4A to virtually no shot in 5A

AthleticSupporter - Jock
AthleticSupporter - Jock

I don't disagree that the better team on that day won.  Central's defense played lights out that game.  My reply was directed to you saying Livingston has virtually no shot in making the playoffs in 5

Pepper Brooks

Pepper Brooks

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, AggiesAreWe said:

Today is the day UIL will hear all appeals in regards to the realignment this past Feb. 1. We will know the status of Beaumont West Brook and Beaumont Harmony Science appeals later today.

Also big news regarding Livingston. It appears that Livingston turned in inaccurate numbers for realignment. Their accurate snap shot number actually will keep them in 5A. Will be interesting to see how UIL handles this.

If Livingston goes back to 5A (which they should) this will cause several teams to look for games to complete their 10 game schedule.

I know it is hard to predict what the UIL will do, but what do you think they will do with Beaumont Harmony Science?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Hitch

Hitch

Posted
Posted

If they move Livingston back to 5A, which district will they go?

 

to Beaumont and make a 9

to Huntsville, Willis, Brenham, Magnolia, Tomball, Waller and make a 9

new caney, kingwood, splendora, Dayton, mont belvieu, humble, Crosby which they are geographically closer.

Keep 20 and 22 at 8 ( even number ) and make 21 a 10 ( even number ).  This also affects fewer overall teams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
AshlyHasBeen

AshlyHasBeen

Posted
Posted

Harmony Science is not part of today's appeal. They've elected not to be part of a UIL district at this time. Here's a statement from their AD.

"Due to a miscommunication during the UIL re-alignment process, we were placed into a district that doesn't match our student athlete's needs. While we are saddened at the loss of conference play, we are grateful to the UIL and the other district 22-4A schools for allowing us to withdraw until the re-alignment process begins again."

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Pepper Brooks

Pepper Brooks

Posted
Posted
9 minutes ago, ShlyKBMT said:

Harmony Science is not part of today's appeal. They've elected not to be part of a UIL district at this time. Here's a statement from their AD.

"Due to a miscommunication during the UIL re-alignment process, we were placed into a district that doesn't match our student athlete's needs. While we are saddened at the loss of conference play, we are grateful to the UIL and the other district 22-4A schools for allowing us to withdraw until the re-alignment process begins again."

 

 

Thanks for the info

Link to comment
Share on other sites
kicker

kicker

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, coachhooker01 said:

what did they appeal for?  Used to work coach in Llano just interested on what they appealed for 

From another site

6

UIL District Assignment Appeals Committee to Meet


FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

AUSTIN— The District Assignment Appeals Committee of the University Interscholastic League will convene at 9:00 a.m., Thursday, February 18 at the UIL Office in Austin to hear reclassification and realignment appeals. 

After the UIL released its biennial reclassification and realignment data on Feb. 1, all schools were given the opportunity to appeal their district and conference assignments. 

Schools Scheduled to Appeal District Assignment: 

 

School

Original District

Requested District

1.

Corpus Christi Calallen

5A – 29

5A – 30

2.

Alice

5A – 29

5A – 30

3.

Castroville Medina Valley

5A – 26

5A – 29

4.

Frankston

3A DII – 10 

3A DII – 8

5.

Llano

4A – 19 (Basketball)

4A – 28

6.

Eustace

3A DI – 9

3A DI – 7

7.

San Angelo Central

6A – 8 (Basketball)

6A – 2 

8.

Wylie

6A – 6

6A – 10

9.

Beaumont West Brook

6A – 12

6A – 22

10.

Pflugerville Connally

5A – 19

5A – 25

11.

Buda Hays

6A – 25

6A – 14

12.

Kyle Lehman

6A – 25

6A – 14

13.

Lockhart

5A – 26

5A – 25

14.

Apple Springs*

1A DII – 15

1A DI – 16

15.

Pharr San Juan Alamo Southwest*

5A – 32

6A – 31

16.

San Antonio Fox Tech*

5A – 28

3A – 26

17. 

Fort Worth Young Men’s Leadership*

6A – 4

5A – 7

18.

Fort Worth Young Women’s Leadership*

6A – 4

5A – 7

 

* Indicates that the school has received a unanimous vote of approval from both the original district and the receiving district. 

 

The meeting of the Assignment Appeals Committee is open to the public and all interested parties are welcome to attend.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
AshlyHasBeen

AshlyHasBeen

Posted
Posted

UIL will has ruled on West Brook's appeal. Bruins will remain in 12-6A for football, but will compete in 22-6A in all other sports.

12-6A Football
West Brook
Conroe
Oak Ridge
The Woodlands
College Park
Lufkin 
Montgomery

22-6A Other Sports
West Brook
Deer Park
La Porte
Pasadena
Pasadena Dobie
Pasadena Memorial
Pasadena Rayburn
South Houston

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Peppermint Patty

Peppermint Patty

Posted
Posted
21 minutes ago, ShlyKBMT said:

UIL will has ruled on West Brook's appeal. Bruins will remain in 12-6A for football, but will compete in 22-6A in all other sports.

12-6A Football
West Brook
Conroe
Oak Ridge
The Woodlands
College Park
Lufkin 
Montgomery

22-6A Other Sports
West Brook
Deer Park
La Porte
Pasadena
Pasadena Dobie
Pasadena Memorial
Pasadena Rayburn
South Houston

So much for the UIL's "proximity" argument that they have used with GCCISD for years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Member Statistics

    45,900
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    henrysmith
    Newest Member
    henrysmith
    Joined


  • Posts

    • bullets13
      Liberty is Open

      By bullets13 · Posted

      I don't know who the other coach was, but this guy has no head coaching experience, and minimal high school experience.  He spent last year at cleveland, who was terrible.  He may be great, and I don't care one way or another, but if Liberty passed up a coach with a history of success for a virtual unknown with virtually no previous success I'd be pretty frustrated if I was a panther fan.
    • idk
      Liberty is Open

      By idk · Posted

      How do you know that Harrison is not a big opportunity? I don't really know him, but maybe just maybe he is what Liberty needs. I was just wondering what you know about Harrison that doesn't make him a big opportunity. 
    • Mr. Thornton Melon
      Liberty is Open

      By Mr. Thornton Melon · Posted

      This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up
    • 5GallonBucket
      Vivek interview with Rubin

      By 5GallonBucket · Posted

      The last 2 or so minutes are so true
    • tvc184
      US Supreme Court case from southeast Texas

      By tvc184 · Posted

      Looking back at the exact wording, it seems like you are correct and it was the concrete barriers that were the ultimate problem. I mentioned it in my last comment, even if it was just the barriers, did Texas take his property? I think a case like US v. Causby might go a long way to proving his case. Causby had an egg farm and during World War II, the US government started flying four engine heavy bombers for the war effort, low over his farm at full power. The extremely loud noise killed a bunch of his chickens and caused many of the rest of them to quit laying eggs. Even though he legally still on the property, he sued, saying that the federal government had effectively “taken” the use of his property from him. The US Supreme Court sided with him, saying that for the purposes of the Fifth Amendment, the federal government had indeed taken away the use of his property. It wasn’t intentional but that didn’t matter. It seems like this case would fall somewhere along those lines.

  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...