Englebert

Members
  • Content count

    3,289
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Englebert

  • Rank
    Advanced Member

Profile Information

  • Gender Not Telling

Recent Profile Visitors

6,095 profile views
  1. Has Mueller's Team Lost All Credibility ?

    I heard Alan Dershowitz stating that he thought all of Mueller's eventual findings could be largely discredited because of the anti-Trump bias, and I got to thinking, "Could Mueller be doing this on purpose?" It's kinda far out there, but not totally implausible. And yes, what better way to expose corruption than by simply putting focus on it.
  2. Legal Eagles- thoughts please on bias/objectivity

    I posted this under another thread, but I'll post it hear also. I'm starting to wonder if Mueller did not in fact, create a cover for Trump. Could Mueller have purposely stacked his team with anti-Trump personnel with the sole intention of discrediting any of their findings? Also, I'm wondering if he knew that these men were blatantly anti-Trump, and put them on his team knowing they would come under intense scrutiny, thus exposing their corruptness. I have no idea...just food for thought.
  3. Has Mueller's Team Lost All Credibility ?

    I'm starting to wonder if Mueller did not in fact, create a cover for Trump. Could Mueller have purposely stacked his team with anti-Trump personnel with the sole intention of discrediting any of their findings? Also, I'm wondering if he knew that these men were blatantly anti-Trump, and put them on his team knowing they would come under intense scrutiny, thus exposing their corruptness. I have no idea...just food for thought.
  4. Roy Moore

    Blah, blah, blah. Your post proves my analysis was spot on...and you don't even realize it. The kindergartners are laughing because even they can see my post accurately predicted you would not answer the question. How are you not embarrassed? Normal people would be. Then again, I don't know what it is like to be blinded by racial hate. 
  5. Global Warming Update!

    I think this link perfectly illustrates the mentality of the Man-Made Global Warming Nazis: http://www.foxnews.com/tech/2017/12/13/controversy-swirls-around-viral-video-starving-polar-bear.html Here's a picture of a starving bear. Conclusion: Man's fault. One example I've used (and maybe overused) when describing the thought processes of these nazis matches this fairly congruently. Global Warming nazis will see a pile of deer bones in the woods, and automatically (and positively) state: A man must have shot him. Anyone with more than two functioning brain cells should be able to realize that one picture of a starving bear does not show evidence of a shrinking habitat. There are plenty of other reasons, some very more logical than Man-Made Global Warming, for seeing a starving bear. Think Occam's razor. And even if Global Warming is the cause, how does this point to Man instead of the Sun (or plenty of other hypotheses)? I've pretty much come to the conclusion that Man-Made Global Warming Nazi logic is simply illogical.
  6. If Roy Moore loses the election in Alabama

    I haven't been following the saga too closely, but I did hear yesterday that Moore was AWOL the last week. The only thing I can think of is maybe his campaign thought they had it wrapped up and didn't want a last minute gaff to spoil it. It's a puzzler to me also. I really think the Sean Hannity interview was the main reason he lost the election. I don't think he ever really recovered from that. I had to literally LOL when I heard Joe Trippi (Jones' campaign manager and a person I respect) actually say that Doug Jones won because the people of Alabama chose Jones' policies over Moore. Now that was funny. It was the PC thing to say, but I'm pretty sure everyone in America knew it was BS.
  7. If Roy Moore loses the election in Alabama

    I need a safe space, replete with tissues, Play-Doh, Crayons and puppies. This safe space needs to have a sky light so I can periodically shout at the sky. I would also like to emphatically state that the Senate seat was robbed. Everyone but Roy Moore is to blame for his loss. America no longer represents the values that I espouse, and the rest of the world will hate us. War is eminent, ending the reign of Man on this planet. (Ooops, I've been acting like a Liberal for so long I almost forgot I wasn't one. Nevermind.)
  8. Roy Moore

    Are "baiting" and "teeing up to get slapped down" synonymous terms?
  9. Global Warming Update!

    The main question is not whether there is warming (or changing) weather...the main question is who is causing it, and is it detrimental to Earth's ability to sustain life. The topic of whether the Earth's climate is currently in a drastic change can be debated until the cows come home, but one thing is undeniable, we have no clue as to the magnitude or culprit or effect of this supposed change. And I somewhat agree with your last statement. I have zero doubt that the government is using the topic in an effort to control the people. 
  10. Roy Moore

    When did less than 1% of anything become evidence of normal behavior? And if I did the same thing, I bet many, many, many people would jump on me saying I can't say things like that because they are baseless. If you give me a second I can probably think of a few of the old "pc outlawed" remarks that were commonplace. Frankly, I have no desire to resurrect any of them, and don't feel that they have a place on a public forum (or anywhere). I just wish it was mutual and "pc outlawed" for everybody.
  11. Roy Moore

    Then call them out. It is not that difficult. If you actually think it is happening as much now, you have a very, very short memory.
  12. Roy Moore

    If true (I haven't read hardly anthing on this subject), I guess he should have waited until he was 49 to hit on 22 year olds. Would he have been given a pass then? (If your curious as to why I posted those ages, look up ol' Bill with Monica Lewinsky.) Whataboutthat! 
  13. Global Warming Update!

    Translation: uh huh.
  14. Global Warming Update!

    Your earlier post contained zero evidence of man's involvement in changing temperatures. You posted a lot of links claiming that Earth's temperatures are changing, then basically said you have to be a moron not to believe Man was the cause. The post was so trite and full of untruths, half-truths, and far-out  "assumptions" that I actually forgot about it. Again, it showed zero evidence of man's contribution, which is exactly what I referenced as the main point of focus. Your post also showed zero empirical evidence of the effects of Earth's ever changing temperatures...just of lot of conjecture from ones with zero credibility on the subject. In fact, nowhere in your post did anything address what is probably the main cause of Earth's temperatures...solar involvement, moon's variations in gravitational tug, variations in Earth's orbit, and/or Earth's uneven wobbles along its axis. No person with any sense of dignity would conclude that Man is the source of ever changing climate without including/discounting these factors in their research. And no one worth their salt should fall victim to those who discount these factors.
  15. Roy Moore

    Is it back to okay to throw out negative stereotypes...or is it just reserved for minorities? If we open it back up to all people to freely throw out disparaging and baseless stereotypes, this board might get real interesting real fast.