Jump to content

High School Softball

Talk about SETX HS Softball right here!


2,567 topics in this forum

    • 0 replies
    • 2.1k views
    • 10 replies
    • 906 views
    • 0 replies
    • 119 views
  1. 21-3A Final District Standings

    • 0 replies
    • 106 views
    • 1 reply
    • 16.8k views
    • 28 replies
    • 4.4k views
    • 0 replies
    • 287 views
  2. State Updates

    • 5 replies
    • 904 views
    • 1 reply
    • 424 views
    • 0 replies
    • 411 views
    • 20 replies
    • 1.2k views
    • 4 replies
    • 413 views
    • 23 replies
    • 1.7k views
  3. Local Softball Commits

    • 2 replies
    • 804 views
    • 10 replies
    • 952 views
    • 5 replies
    • 940 views
    • 1 reply
    • 342 views
  4. District 3A-22

    • 1 reply
    • 537 views
    • 14 replies
    • 1.8k views
    • 2 replies
    • 473 views
    • 1 reply
    • 1.2k views
    • 4 replies
    • 545 views
    • 0 replies
    • 236 views
    • 0 replies
    • 241 views
    • 2 replies
    • 607 views
    • 3 replies
    • 712 views
    • 0 replies
    • 246 views
    • 0 replies
    • 294 views
    • 2 replies
    • 1.8k views
    • 35 replies
    • 2.6k views
    • 21 replies
    • 1.6k views
    • 8 replies
    • 1.3k views
  5. Area rd scores

    • 23 replies
    • 1.7k views
  6. Area round info

    • 9 replies
    • 972 views
  7. Bi District scores

    • 15 replies
    • 1.7k views
    • 18 replies
    • 2.4k views
    • 30 replies
    • 2.6k views
    • 14 replies
    • 1.3k views
    • 0 replies
    • 277 views
  8. Schedule playoffs

    • 3 replies
    • 449 views
  9. District 22-3A

    • 1 reply
    • 785 views
    • 6 replies
    • 804 views
  10. Week 9 scores

    • 11 replies
    • 1.3k views
  11. Week 8 scores

    • 8 replies
    • 999 views
  12. Week 7 scores

    • 13 replies
    • 1.1k views
  13. Week 6 scores

    • 17 replies
    • 1.5k views
    • 6 replies
    • 910 views
  14. Week 5 Scores

    • 13 replies
    • 1.6k views
    • 1 reply
    • 459 views
    • 0 replies
    • 340 views
    • 0 replies
    • 645 views
  15. Week 4 scores

    • 12 replies
    • 1.1k views
  16. Week 3 scores 1 2

    • 43 replies
    • 1.8k views
  17. NEDERLAND @ VIDOR

    • 0 replies
    • 709 views
  18. Softball week 2 Scores 1 2

    • 25 replies
    • 1.5k views
    • 10 replies
    • 803 views
  19. Jasper Tournament

    • 1 reply
    • 577 views
    • 22 replies
    • 1.4k views
  20. 2023 Schedules

    • 2 replies
    • 1.1k views
    • 141 replies
    • 8.4k views


  • Live & Upcoming Broadcasts

  • Posts

    • How do you know that Harrison is not a big opportunity? I don't really know him, but maybe just maybe he is what Liberty needs. I was just wondering what you know about Harrison that doesn't make him a big opportunity. 
    • This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up
    • The last 2 or so minutes are so true
    • Looking back at the exact wording, it seems like you are correct and it was the concrete barriers that were the ultimate problem. I mentioned it in my last comment, even if it was just the barriers, did Texas take his property? I think a case like US v. Causby might go a long way to proving his case. Causby had an egg farm and during World War II, the US government started flying four engine heavy bombers for the war effort, low over his farm at full power. The extremely loud noise killed a bunch of his chickens and caused many of the rest of them to quit laying eggs. Even though he legally still on the property, he sued, saying that the federal government had effectively “taken” the use of his property from him. The US Supreme Court sided with him, saying that for the purposes of the Fifth Amendment, the federal government had indeed taken away the use of his property. It wasn’t intentional but that didn’t matter. It seems like this case would fall somewhere along those lines.
    • That might have added to it but it said that they intentionally raised the roadway to help it act as a dam. Even if it was the dividers and no intent, did the state “take” his property without compensation? I think that it is interesting that a local landowner fought his case all the way to the US Supreme Court and won in a unanimous decision. So while he has not won his case yet, he won the right to have his day in court and possibly heard by a jury.     
×
×
  • Create New...